Message ID | 20220309134702.9942-1-jason-jh.lin@mediatek.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | Fix MediaTek display dt-bindings issues | expand |
On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 7:47 AM jason-jh.lin <jason-jh.lin@mediatek.com> wrote: > > The vdosys0 series carried a nice dt-bindings conversion of the old > txt documentation for the entire mediatek-drm driver, but some of > the issues in there weren't seen. > > This series is fixing all of the issues pointed out by a > `dt_binding_check` run, followed by `dtbs_check`. > > Change in v2: > - remove mediatek,ethdr.yaml file > - change include header of mediatek,ovl-2l.yaml from mt8173 to mt8183 > > AngeloGioacchino Del Regno (3): > dt-bindings: display: mediatek, mutex: Fix mediatek, gce-events type > dt-bindings: display: mediatek, ovl: Fix 'iommu' required property > typo > dt-bindings: display: mediatek: Fix examples on new bindings > > jason-jh.lin (1): > Revert "dt-bindings: display: mediatek: add ethdr definition for > mt8195" Can this series get applied soon? linux-next is still broken. If it hits Linus' tree, I will be applying them. Rob
Hi, Rob: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> 於 2022年3月23日 週三 下午10:10寫道: > > On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 7:47 AM jason-jh.lin <jason-jh.lin@mediatek.com> wrote: > > > > The vdosys0 series carried a nice dt-bindings conversion of the old > > txt documentation for the entire mediatek-drm driver, but some of > > the issues in there weren't seen. > > > > This series is fixing all of the issues pointed out by a > > `dt_binding_check` run, followed by `dtbs_check`. > > > > Change in v2: > > - remove mediatek,ethdr.yaml file > > - change include header of mediatek,ovl-2l.yaml from mt8173 to mt8183 > > > > AngeloGioacchino Del Regno (3): > > dt-bindings: display: mediatek, mutex: Fix mediatek, gce-events type > > dt-bindings: display: mediatek, ovl: Fix 'iommu' required property > > typo > > dt-bindings: display: mediatek: Fix examples on new bindings > > > > jason-jh.lin (1): > > Revert "dt-bindings: display: mediatek: add ethdr definition for > > mt8195" > > Can this series get applied soon? linux-next is still broken. > > If it hits Linus' tree, I will be applying them. I've applied this series to my tree [1], but now is merge window, so I plan to send this series through Dave's tree after 5.18-rc1. Would this be too late for you? [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/chunkuang.hu/linux.git/log/?h=mediatek-drm-fixes Regards, Chun-Kuang. > > Rob
On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 09:25:44PM +0800, Chun-Kuang Hu wrote: > Hi, Rob: > > Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> 於 2022年3月23日 週三 下午10:10寫道: > > > > On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 7:47 AM jason-jh.lin <jason-jh.lin@mediatek.com> wrote: > > > > > > The vdosys0 series carried a nice dt-bindings conversion of the old > > > txt documentation for the entire mediatek-drm driver, but some of > > > the issues in there weren't seen. > > > > > > This series is fixing all of the issues pointed out by a > > > `dt_binding_check` run, followed by `dtbs_check`. > > > > > > Change in v2: > > > - remove mediatek,ethdr.yaml file > > > - change include header of mediatek,ovl-2l.yaml from mt8173 to mt8183 > > > > > > AngeloGioacchino Del Regno (3): > > > dt-bindings: display: mediatek, mutex: Fix mediatek, gce-events type > > > dt-bindings: display: mediatek, ovl: Fix 'iommu' required property > > > typo > > > dt-bindings: display: mediatek: Fix examples on new bindings > > > > > > jason-jh.lin (1): > > > Revert "dt-bindings: display: mediatek: add ethdr definition for > > > mt8195" > > > > Can this series get applied soon? linux-next is still broken. > > > > If it hits Linus' tree, I will be applying them. > > I've applied this series to my tree [1], but now is merge window, so I > plan to send this series through Dave's tree after 5.18-rc1. Would > this be too late for you? Yes, people base their development on -rc1 and it would be nice to have a functional tree. There's not really any need to wait to send fixes. Rob