Message ID | 20240123104250.9103-1-linyunsheng@huawei.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | remove page frag implementation in vhost_net | expand |
+cc Micheal and Jason
On 2024/1/23 18:42, Yunsheng Lin wrote:
Hi, Micheal and Jason
Is this patchset supposed to go through vhost tree instead of net-next?
As the state is changed to 'Not applicable' in the netdevbpf patchwork,
according to maintainer-netdev.rst:
Not applicable patch is expected to be applied outside of the networking
subsystem
>
On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 20:40:37 +0800 Yunsheng Lin wrote: > Is this patchset supposed to go through vhost tree instead of net-next? > As the state is changed to 'Not applicable' in the netdevbpf patchwork, > according to maintainer-netdev.rst: > > Not applicable patch is expected to be applied outside of the networking > subsystem Sorry about the confusion, DaveM changed the way he uses the states since they were documented. There were concurrent changes to the gve driver, patches no longer apply. Could you rebase?
On 2024/1/30 10:08, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 20:40:37 +0800 Yunsheng Lin wrote: >> Is this patchset supposed to go through vhost tree instead of net-next? >> As the state is changed to 'Not applicable' in the netdevbpf patchwork, >> according to maintainer-netdev.rst: >> >> Not applicable patch is expected to be applied outside of the networking >> subsystem > > Sorry about the confusion, DaveM changed the way he uses the states > since they were documented. There were concurrent changes to the gve > driver, patches no longer apply. Could you rebase? Sure. Thanks for clarifying. > . >