| Message ID | 20240925075707.3970187-1-linyunsheng@huawei.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| Headers | show |
| Series | fix two bugs related to page_pool | expand |
Tested-by: Yonglong Liu <liuyonglong@huawei.com> On 2024/9/25 15:57, Yunsheng Lin wrote: > Patch 1 fix a possible time window problem for page_pool. > Patch 2 fix the kernel crash problem at iommu_get_dma_domain > reported in [1]. > > When page_pool_put_unrefed_netmem() is called with allow_direct > being true, there is only a newly added checking overhead > introduced in patch 1, which seem to be no noticeable performance > impact. > > When page_pool_put_unrefed_netmem() is called with allow_direct > being false, there is an added rcu read lock overhead introduced in > patch 1, and the overhead is about 13ns using the below test code, > but 'time_bench_page_pool02_ptr_ring' only show about 2ns overhead, > which is about 2% degradation. > > +static int time_bench_rcu( > + struct time_bench_record *rec, void *data) > +{ > + uint64_t loops_cnt = 0; > + int i; > + > + time_bench_start(rec); > + /** Loop to measure **/ > + for (i = 0; i < rec->loops; i++) { > + rcu_read_lock(); > + loops_cnt++; > + barrier(); /* avoid compiler to optimize this loop */ > + rcu_read_unlock(); > + } > + time_bench_stop(rec, loops_cnt); > + return loops_cnt; > +} > > When page_pool need to be refilled from or flushed to the page allocator, > the added overhead is the page_pool_item_add() and page_pool_item_del() > calling overhead, using below patch to enable Jesper's testing running in > arm64, the overhead is 0~20ns, which is quite variable > > Before this patchset: > root@(none)$ taskset -c 1 insmod bench_page_pool_simple.ko > [ 136.641453] bench_page_pool_simple: Loaded > [ 136.722560] time_bench: Type:for_loop Per elem: 0 cycles(tsc) 0.769 ns (step:0) - (measurement period time:0.076968720 sec time_interval:76968720) - (invoke count:100000000 tsc_interval:7696855) > [ 137.317006] time_bench: Type:atomic_inc Per elem: 0 cycles(tsc) 5.771 ns (step:0) - (measurement period time:0.577164350 sec time_interval:577164350) - (invoke count:100000000 tsc_interval:57716429) > [ 137.480852] time_bench: Type:lock Per elem: 1 cycles(tsc) 14.621 ns (step:0) - (measurement period time:0.146218730 sec time_interval:146218730) - (invoke count:10000000 tsc_interval:14621868) > [ 138.842377] time_bench: Type:rcu Per elem: 1 cycles(tsc) 13.444 ns (step:0) - (measurement period time:1.344419820 sec time_interval:1344419820) - (invoke count:100000000 tsc_interval:134441975) > [ 138.859656] bench_page_pool_simple: time_bench_page_pool01_fast_path(): Cannot use page_pool fast-path > [ 139.132102] time_bench: Type:no-softirq-page_pool01 Per elem: 2 cycles(tsc) 26.315 ns (step:0) - (measurement period time:0.263151430 sec time_interval:263151430) - (invoke count:10000000 tsc_interval:26315135) > [ 139.150769] bench_page_pool_simple: time_bench_page_pool02_ptr_ring(): Cannot use page_pool fast-path > [ 139.910642] time_bench: Type:no-softirq-page_pool02 Per elem: 7 cycles(tsc) 75.066 ns (step:0) - (measurement period time:0.750663200 sec time_interval:750663200) - (invoke count:10000000 tsc_interval:75066312) > [ 139.929312] bench_page_pool_simple: time_bench_page_pool03_slow(): Cannot use page_pool fast-path > [ 141.673951] time_bench: Type:no-softirq-page_pool03 Per elem: 17 cycles(tsc) 173.578 ns (step:0) - (measurement period time:1.735781610 sec time_interval:1735781610) - (invoke count:10000000 tsc_interval:173578155) > [ 141.692970] bench_page_pool_simple: pp_tasklet_handler(): in_serving_softirq fast-path > [ 141.700874] bench_page_pool_simple: time_bench_page_pool01_fast_path(): in_serving_softirq fast-path > [ 141.973638] time_bench: Type:tasklet_page_pool01_fast_path Per elem: 2 cycles(tsc) 26.364 ns (step:0) - (measurement period time:0.263645150 sec time_interval:263645150) - (invoke count:10000000 tsc_interval:26364508) > [ 141.992912] bench_page_pool_simple: time_bench_page_pool02_ptr_ring(): in_serving_softirq fast-path > [ 142.531745] time_bench: Type:tasklet_page_pool02_ptr_ring Per elem: 5 cycles(tsc) 52.980 ns (step:0) - (measurement period time:0.529801250 sec time_interval:529801250) - (invoke count:10000000 tsc_interval:52980119) > [ 142.550933] bench_page_pool_simple: time_bench_page_pool03_slow(): in_serving_softirq fast-path > [ 144.297646] time_bench: Type:tasklet_page_pool03_slow Per elem: 17 cycles(tsc) 173.802 ns (step:0) - (measurement period time:1.738029000 sec time_interval:1738029000) - (invoke count:10000000 tsc_interval:173802894) > > After this patchset: > root@(none)$ taskset -c 1 insmod bench_page_pool_simple.ko > [ 149.865799] bench_page_pool_simple: Loaded > [ 149.946907] time_bench: Type:for_loop Per elem: 0 cycles(tsc) 0.769 ns (step:0) - (measurement period time:0.076965620 sec time_interval:76965620) - (invoke count:100000000 tsc_interval:7696556) > [ 150.722282] time_bench: Type:atomic_inc Per elem: 0 cycles(tsc) 7.580 ns (step:0) - (measurement period time:0.758094660 sec time_interval:758094660) - (invoke count:100000000 tsc_interval:75809459) > [ 150.886335] time_bench: Type:lock Per elem: 1 cycles(tsc) 14.640 ns (step:0) - (measurement period time:0.146405830 sec time_interval:146405830) - (invoke count:10000000 tsc_interval:14640578) > [ 152.249454] time_bench: Type:rcu Per elem: 1 cycles(tsc) 13.460 ns (step:0) - (measurement period time:1.346009570 sec time_interval:1346009570) - (invoke count:100000000 tsc_interval:134600951) > [ 152.266734] bench_page_pool_simple: time_bench_page_pool01_fast_path(): Cannot use page_pool fast-path > [ 152.537046] time_bench: Type:no-softirq-page_pool01 Per elem: 2 cycles(tsc) 26.100 ns (step:0) - (measurement period time:0.261007670 sec time_interval:261007670) - (invoke count:10000000 tsc_interval:26100761) > [ 152.555714] bench_page_pool_simple: time_bench_page_pool02_ptr_ring(): Cannot use page_pool fast-path > [ 153.342212] time_bench: Type:no-softirq-page_pool02 Per elem: 7 cycles(tsc) 77.729 ns (step:0) - (measurement period time:0.777293380 sec time_interval:777293380) - (invoke count:10000000 tsc_interval:77729331) > [ 153.360881] bench_page_pool_simple: time_bench_page_pool03_slow(): Cannot use page_pool fast-path > [ 155.287747] time_bench: Type:no-softirq-page_pool03 Per elem: 19 cycles(tsc) 191.800 ns (step:0) - (measurement period time:1.918007990 sec time_interval:1918007990) - (invoke count:10000000 tsc_interval:191800791) > [ 155.306766] bench_page_pool_simple: pp_tasklet_handler(): in_serving_softirq fast-path > [ 155.314670] bench_page_pool_simple: time_bench_page_pool01_fast_path(): in_serving_softirq fast-path > [ 155.584313] time_bench: Type:tasklet_page_pool01_fast_path Per elem: 2 cycles(tsc) 26.052 ns (step:0) - (measurement period time:0.260524810 sec time_interval:260524810) - (invoke count:10000000 tsc_interval:26052476) > [ 155.603588] bench_page_pool_simple: time_bench_page_pool02_ptr_ring(): in_serving_softirq fast-path > [ 156.183214] time_bench: Type:tasklet_page_pool02_ptr_ring Per elem: 5 cycles(tsc) 57.059 ns (step:0) - (measurement period time:0.570594850 sec time_interval:570594850) - (invoke count:10000000 tsc_interval:57059478) > [ 156.202402] bench_page_pool_simple: time_bench_page_pool03_slow(): in_serving_softirq fast-path > [ 158.045594] time_bench: Type:tasklet_page_pool03_slow Per elem: 18 cycles(tsc) 183.450 ns (step:0) - (measurement period time:1.834507700 sec time_interval:1834507700) - (invoke count:10000000 tsc_interval:183450764) > > Patch for time_bench.h enable the out of tree testing on arm64 system: > @@ -101,6 +101,7 @@ struct time_bench_cpu { > * CPUID clears the high 32-bits of all (rax/rbx/rcx/rdx) > */ > static __always_inline uint64_t tsc_start_clock(void) { > +#if defined(__i386__) || defined(__x86_64__) > /* See: Intel Doc #324264 */ > unsigned hi, lo; > asm volatile ( > @@ -111,9 +112,13 @@ static __always_inline uint64_t tsc_start_clock(void) { > "%rax", "%rbx", "%rcx", "%rdx"); > //FIXME: on 32bit use clobbered %eax + %edx > return ((uint64_t)lo) | (((uint64_t)hi) << 32); > +#else > + return get_cycles(); > +#endif > } > > static __always_inline uint64_t tsc_stop_clock(void) { > +#if defined(__i386__) || defined(__x86_64__) > /* See: Intel Doc #324264 */ > unsigned hi, lo; > asm volatile( > @@ -123,6 +128,9 @@ static __always_inline uint64_t tsc_stop_clock(void) { > "CPUID\n\t": "=r" (hi), "=r" (lo):: > "%rax", "%rbx", "%rcx", "%rdx"); > return ((uint64_t)lo) | (((uint64_t)hi) << 32); > +#else > + return get_cycles(); > +#endif > } > > /* Notes for RDTSC and RDTSCP > @@ -186,10 +194,14 @@ enum { > > static __always_inline unsigned long long p_rdpmc(unsigned in) > { > +#if defined(__i386__) || defined(__x86_64__) > unsigned d, a; > > asm volatile("rdpmc" : "=d" (d), "=a" (a) : "c" (in) : "memory"); > return ((unsigned long long)d << 32) | a; > +#else > + return 0; > +#endif > } > > /* These PMU counter needs to be enabled, but I don't have the > @@ -216,7 +228,11 @@ static __always_inline unsigned long long pmc_clk(void) > #define MSR_IA32_PCM2 0x400000C3 > inline uint64_t msr_inst(unsigned long long *msr_result) > { > +#if defined(__i386__) || defined(__x86_64__) > return rdmsrl_safe(MSR_IA32_PCM0, msr_result); > +#else > + return 0; > +#endif > } > > 1. https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/8067f204-1380-4d37-8ffd-007fc6f26738@kernel.org/T/ > > CC: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@intel.com> > CC: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> > CC: Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@gmail.com> > CC: IOMMU <iommu@lists.linux.dev> > > Change log: > V2: > 1. Add a item_full stat. > 2. Use container_of() for page_pool_to_pp(). > > Yunsheng Lin (2): > page_pool: fix timing for checking and disabling napi_local > page_pool: fix IOMMU crash when driver has already unbound > > drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c | 8 +- > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf_txrx.c | 6 +- > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_txrx.c | 14 +- > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/libeth/rx.c | 2 +- > .../net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/xdp.c | 3 +- > drivers/net/netdevsim/netdev.c | 6 +- > drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76.h | 2 +- > include/linux/mm_types.h | 2 +- > include/linux/skbuff.h | 1 + > include/net/libeth/rx.h | 3 +- > include/net/netmem.h | 10 +- > include/net/page_pool/helpers.h | 7 + > include/net/page_pool/types.h | 17 +- > net/core/devmem.c | 4 +- > net/core/netmem_priv.h | 5 +- > net/core/page_pool.c | 190 +++++++++++++++--- > net/core/page_pool_priv.h | 10 +- > net/core/skbuff.c | 3 +- > net/core/xdp.c | 3 +- > 19 files changed, 238 insertions(+), 58 deletions(-) >
On 2024/9/25 15:57, Yunsheng Lin wrote: > Patch 1 fix a possible time window problem for page_pool. > Patch 2 fix the kernel crash problem at iommu_get_dma_domain > reported in [1]. Hi, all Through the discussions, it seems there are some main concerns as below: 1. Semantics changing of supporting unlimited inflight pages to limited inflight pages that are as large as the pool_size of page_pool. 2. The overhead of finding available pool->items in page_pool_item_add(). Any other concerns I missed here? As it is unclear about the impact of the above concerns, which seemed to lead Paolo to suggest this patchset targetting net-next tree instead of net tree, so I am planning to target the net-next tree keeping the 'Fixes' tag for the next version, if there is any other opinion here, please let me know. Also, I still have the page_frag refactoring patchset pending in the nex-next, please let me know if I should wait for that patchset to be applied before sending this one to the net-next tree. >
On Sat, 12 Oct 2024 20:05:31 +0800 Yunsheng Lin wrote: > 1. Semantics changing of supporting unlimited inflight pages > to limited inflight pages that are as large as the pool_size > of page_pool. How can this possibly work? The main thing stopping me from reposting my fix that it'd be nice to figure out if a real IOMMU device is bound or not. If we don't have real per-device mappings we presumably don't have to wait. If we can check this condition we are guaranteed not to introduce regressions, since we would be replacing a crash by a wait, which is strictly better. If we'd need to fiddle with too many internals to find out if we have to wait - let's just always wait and see if anyone complains.
On 2024/10/15 8:14, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Sat, 12 Oct 2024 20:05:31 +0800 Yunsheng Lin wrote: >> 1. Semantics changing of supporting unlimited inflight pages >> to limited inflight pages that are as large as the pool_size >> of page_pool. > > How can this possibly work? As a similar comment in [1], do we really need unlimited inflight pages for the page_pool to work? If we do, it seems there is something really need fixing here. I am agreed changing of semantics here might introduce regressions here because there may be some subsystem depending on the previous semantics or incorrect calculating of how many inflight pages it is needed, so I am agreed that it might be better to target the net-next tree to give some cycles of testing before backporting it. 1. https://lore.kernel.org/all/842c8cc6-f716-437a-bc98-70bc26d6fd38@huawei.com/ > > The main thing stopping me from reposting my fix that it'd be nice to > figure out if a real IOMMU device is bound or not. If we don't have device_iommu_mapped() might be used to check if a real IOMMU device is bound or not. I am afraid it is not just about IOMMU here as there might be other resource behind the dma mapping, like the bounce buffer memory as below: https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.7-rc8/source/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c#L1204 https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.7-rc8/source/kernel/dma/direct.h#L125 And we may argue is_swiotlb_active() can be used check if there is any bounce buffer memory behind the dma mapping as the device_iommu_mapped() does, but I am not sure if there is any other resource besides iommu and bounce buffer. > real per-device mappings we presumably don't have to wait. If we can For not having to wait part: I am not sure if the page_pool_destroy()/__page_pool_release_page_dma() need to synchronize with arch_teardown_dma_ops() or how to synchronize with it, as it seems to be called when driver unloading even if we have ensured that there is no IOMMU or bounce buffer memory behind the device by the above checking: __device_release_driver -> device_unbind_cleanup -> arch_teardown_dma_ops > check this condition we are guaranteed not to introduce regressions, > since we would be replacing a crash by a wait, which is strictly better. For the waiting part: The problem is how much time we need to wait when device_iommu_mapped() or is_swiotlb_active() return true here, as mentioned in [2], [3]. And currently the waiting might be infinite as the testing in [4]. > > If we'd need to fiddle with too many internals to find out if we have > to wait - let's just always wait and see if anyone complains. Does the testing report in [4] classify as someone complaining? As the driver unloading seems to be stalling forever, and the cause of the infinite stalling is skb_attempt_defer_free() by debugging as mentioned in [2]. 2. https://lore.kernel.org/all/2c5ccfff-6ab4-4aea-bff6-3679ff72cc9a@huawei.com/ 3. https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/d50ac1a9-f1e2-49ee-b89b-05dac9bc6ee1@huawei.com/ 4. https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/758b4d47-c980-4f66-b4a4-949c3fc4b040@huawei.com/ >
Patch 1 fix a possible time window problem for page_pool. Patch 2 fix the kernel crash problem at iommu_get_dma_domain reported in [1]. When page_pool_put_unrefed_netmem() is called with allow_direct being true, there is only a newly added checking overhead introduced in patch 1, which seem to be no noticeable performance impact. When page_pool_put_unrefed_netmem() is called with allow_direct being false, there is an added rcu read lock overhead introduced in patch 1, and the overhead is about 13ns using the below test code, but 'time_bench_page_pool02_ptr_ring' only show about 2ns overhead, which is about 2% degradation. +static int time_bench_rcu( + struct time_bench_record *rec, void *data) +{ + uint64_t loops_cnt = 0; + int i; + + time_bench_start(rec); + /** Loop to measure **/ + for (i = 0; i < rec->loops; i++) { + rcu_read_lock(); + loops_cnt++; + barrier(); /* avoid compiler to optimize this loop */ + rcu_read_unlock(); + } + time_bench_stop(rec, loops_cnt); + return loops_cnt; +} When page_pool need to be refilled from or flushed to the page allocator, the added overhead is the page_pool_item_add() and page_pool_item_del() calling overhead, using below patch to enable Jesper's testing running in arm64, the overhead is 0~20ns, which is quite variable Before this patchset: root@(none)$ taskset -c 1 insmod bench_page_pool_simple.ko [ 136.641453] bench_page_pool_simple: Loaded [ 136.722560] time_bench: Type:for_loop Per elem: 0 cycles(tsc) 0.769 ns (step:0) - (measurement period time:0.076968720 sec time_interval:76968720) - (invoke count:100000000 tsc_interval:7696855) [ 137.317006] time_bench: Type:atomic_inc Per elem: 0 cycles(tsc) 5.771 ns (step:0) - (measurement period time:0.577164350 sec time_interval:577164350) - (invoke count:100000000 tsc_interval:57716429) [ 137.480852] time_bench: Type:lock Per elem: 1 cycles(tsc) 14.621 ns (step:0) - (measurement period time:0.146218730 sec time_interval:146218730) - (invoke count:10000000 tsc_interval:14621868) [ 138.842377] time_bench: Type:rcu Per elem: 1 cycles(tsc) 13.444 ns (step:0) - (measurement period time:1.344419820 sec time_interval:1344419820) - (invoke count:100000000 tsc_interval:134441975) [ 138.859656] bench_page_pool_simple: time_bench_page_pool01_fast_path(): Cannot use page_pool fast-path [ 139.132102] time_bench: Type:no-softirq-page_pool01 Per elem: 2 cycles(tsc) 26.315 ns (step:0) - (measurement period time:0.263151430 sec time_interval:263151430) - (invoke count:10000000 tsc_interval:26315135) [ 139.150769] bench_page_pool_simple: time_bench_page_pool02_ptr_ring(): Cannot use page_pool fast-path [ 139.910642] time_bench: Type:no-softirq-page_pool02 Per elem: 7 cycles(tsc) 75.066 ns (step:0) - (measurement period time:0.750663200 sec time_interval:750663200) - (invoke count:10000000 tsc_interval:75066312) [ 139.929312] bench_page_pool_simple: time_bench_page_pool03_slow(): Cannot use page_pool fast-path [ 141.673951] time_bench: Type:no-softirq-page_pool03 Per elem: 17 cycles(tsc) 173.578 ns (step:0) - (measurement period time:1.735781610 sec time_interval:1735781610) - (invoke count:10000000 tsc_interval:173578155) [ 141.692970] bench_page_pool_simple: pp_tasklet_handler(): in_serving_softirq fast-path [ 141.700874] bench_page_pool_simple: time_bench_page_pool01_fast_path(): in_serving_softirq fast-path [ 141.973638] time_bench: Type:tasklet_page_pool01_fast_path Per elem: 2 cycles(tsc) 26.364 ns (step:0) - (measurement period time:0.263645150 sec time_interval:263645150) - (invoke count:10000000 tsc_interval:26364508) [ 141.992912] bench_page_pool_simple: time_bench_page_pool02_ptr_ring(): in_serving_softirq fast-path [ 142.531745] time_bench: Type:tasklet_page_pool02_ptr_ring Per elem: 5 cycles(tsc) 52.980 ns (step:0) - (measurement period time:0.529801250 sec time_interval:529801250) - (invoke count:10000000 tsc_interval:52980119) [ 142.550933] bench_page_pool_simple: time_bench_page_pool03_slow(): in_serving_softirq fast-path [ 144.297646] time_bench: Type:tasklet_page_pool03_slow Per elem: 17 cycles(tsc) 173.802 ns (step:0) - (measurement period time:1.738029000 sec time_interval:1738029000) - (invoke count:10000000 tsc_interval:173802894) After this patchset: root@(none)$ taskset -c 1 insmod bench_page_pool_simple.ko [ 149.865799] bench_page_pool_simple: Loaded [ 149.946907] time_bench: Type:for_loop Per elem: 0 cycles(tsc) 0.769 ns (step:0) - (measurement period time:0.076965620 sec time_interval:76965620) - (invoke count:100000000 tsc_interval:7696556) [ 150.722282] time_bench: Type:atomic_inc Per elem: 0 cycles(tsc) 7.580 ns (step:0) - (measurement period time:0.758094660 sec time_interval:758094660) - (invoke count:100000000 tsc_interval:75809459) [ 150.886335] time_bench: Type:lock Per elem: 1 cycles(tsc) 14.640 ns (step:0) - (measurement period time:0.146405830 sec time_interval:146405830) - (invoke count:10000000 tsc_interval:14640578) [ 152.249454] time_bench: Type:rcu Per elem: 1 cycles(tsc) 13.460 ns (step:0) - (measurement period time:1.346009570 sec time_interval:1346009570) - (invoke count:100000000 tsc_interval:134600951) [ 152.266734] bench_page_pool_simple: time_bench_page_pool01_fast_path(): Cannot use page_pool fast-path [ 152.537046] time_bench: Type:no-softirq-page_pool01 Per elem: 2 cycles(tsc) 26.100 ns (step:0) - (measurement period time:0.261007670 sec time_interval:261007670) - (invoke count:10000000 tsc_interval:26100761) [ 152.555714] bench_page_pool_simple: time_bench_page_pool02_ptr_ring(): Cannot use page_pool fast-path [ 153.342212] time_bench: Type:no-softirq-page_pool02 Per elem: 7 cycles(tsc) 77.729 ns (step:0) - (measurement period time:0.777293380 sec time_interval:777293380) - (invoke count:10000000 tsc_interval:77729331) [ 153.360881] bench_page_pool_simple: time_bench_page_pool03_slow(): Cannot use page_pool fast-path [ 155.287747] time_bench: Type:no-softirq-page_pool03 Per elem: 19 cycles(tsc) 191.800 ns (step:0) - (measurement period time:1.918007990 sec time_interval:1918007990) - (invoke count:10000000 tsc_interval:191800791) [ 155.306766] bench_page_pool_simple: pp_tasklet_handler(): in_serving_softirq fast-path [ 155.314670] bench_page_pool_simple: time_bench_page_pool01_fast_path(): in_serving_softirq fast-path [ 155.584313] time_bench: Type:tasklet_page_pool01_fast_path Per elem: 2 cycles(tsc) 26.052 ns (step:0) - (measurement period time:0.260524810 sec time_interval:260524810) - (invoke count:10000000 tsc_interval:26052476) [ 155.603588] bench_page_pool_simple: time_bench_page_pool02_ptr_ring(): in_serving_softirq fast-path [ 156.183214] time_bench: Type:tasklet_page_pool02_ptr_ring Per elem: 5 cycles(tsc) 57.059 ns (step:0) - (measurement period time:0.570594850 sec time_interval:570594850) - (invoke count:10000000 tsc_interval:57059478) [ 156.202402] bench_page_pool_simple: time_bench_page_pool03_slow(): in_serving_softirq fast-path [ 158.045594] time_bench: Type:tasklet_page_pool03_slow Per elem: 18 cycles(tsc) 183.450 ns (step:0) - (measurement period time:1.834507700 sec time_interval:1834507700) - (invoke count:10000000 tsc_interval:183450764) Patch for time_bench.h enable the out of tree testing on arm64 system: @@ -101,6 +101,7 @@ struct time_bench_cpu { * CPUID clears the high 32-bits of all (rax/rbx/rcx/rdx) */ static __always_inline uint64_t tsc_start_clock(void) { +#if defined(__i386__) || defined(__x86_64__) /* See: Intel Doc #324264 */ unsigned hi, lo; asm volatile ( @@ -111,9 +112,13 @@ static __always_inline uint64_t tsc_start_clock(void) { "%rax", "%rbx", "%rcx", "%rdx"); //FIXME: on 32bit use clobbered %eax + %edx return ((uint64_t)lo) | (((uint64_t)hi) << 32); +#else + return get_cycles(); +#endif } static __always_inline uint64_t tsc_stop_clock(void) { +#if defined(__i386__) || defined(__x86_64__) /* See: Intel Doc #324264 */ unsigned hi, lo; asm volatile( @@ -123,6 +128,9 @@ static __always_inline uint64_t tsc_stop_clock(void) { "CPUID\n\t": "=r" (hi), "=r" (lo):: "%rax", "%rbx", "%rcx", "%rdx"); return ((uint64_t)lo) | (((uint64_t)hi) << 32); +#else + return get_cycles(); +#endif } /* Notes for RDTSC and RDTSCP @@ -186,10 +194,14 @@ enum { static __always_inline unsigned long long p_rdpmc(unsigned in) { +#if defined(__i386__) || defined(__x86_64__) unsigned d, a; asm volatile("rdpmc" : "=d" (d), "=a" (a) : "c" (in) : "memory"); return ((unsigned long long)d << 32) | a; +#else + return 0; +#endif } /* These PMU counter needs to be enabled, but I don't have the @@ -216,7 +228,11 @@ static __always_inline unsigned long long pmc_clk(void) #define MSR_IA32_PCM2 0x400000C3 inline uint64_t msr_inst(unsigned long long *msr_result) { +#if defined(__i386__) || defined(__x86_64__) return rdmsrl_safe(MSR_IA32_PCM0, msr_result); +#else + return 0; +#endif } 1. https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/8067f204-1380-4d37-8ffd-007fc6f26738@kernel.org/T/ CC: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@intel.com> CC: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> CC: Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@gmail.com> CC: IOMMU <iommu@lists.linux.dev> Change log: V2: 1. Add a item_full stat. 2. Use container_of() for page_pool_to_pp(). Yunsheng Lin (2): page_pool: fix timing for checking and disabling napi_local page_pool: fix IOMMU crash when driver has already unbound drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c | 8 +- drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf_txrx.c | 6 +- drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_txrx.c | 14 +- drivers/net/ethernet/intel/libeth/rx.c | 2 +- .../net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/xdp.c | 3 +- drivers/net/netdevsim/netdev.c | 6 +- drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76.h | 2 +- include/linux/mm_types.h | 2 +- include/linux/skbuff.h | 1 + include/net/libeth/rx.h | 3 +- include/net/netmem.h | 10 +- include/net/page_pool/helpers.h | 7 + include/net/page_pool/types.h | 17 +- net/core/devmem.c | 4 +- net/core/netmem_priv.h | 5 +- net/core/page_pool.c | 190 +++++++++++++++--- net/core/page_pool_priv.h | 10 +- net/core/skbuff.c | 3 +- net/core/xdp.c | 3 +- 19 files changed, 238 insertions(+), 58 deletions(-)