Message ID | 1548071976-13279-1-git-send-email-jianjun.wang@mediatek.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | PCI: mediatek: Remove MSI inner domain | expand |
On Mon, 2019-01-21 at 19:59 +0800, Jianjun Wang wrote: > There is no need to create the inner domain as a parent for MSI domian, > some feature has been implemented by MSI framework. > > Remove the inner domain and its irq chip, it will be more closer to the > hardware implementation. > > Signed-off-by: Jianjun Wang <jianjun.wang@mediatek.com> > --- > drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mediatek.c | 82 +++++++++++--------------- > 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mediatek.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mediatek.c > index 8d05df56158b..216e6fa8aec0 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mediatek.c > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mediatek.c > @@ -169,7 +169,6 @@ struct mtk_pcie_soc { > * @slot: port slot > * @irq: GIC irq > * @irq_domain: legacy INTx IRQ domain > - * @inner_domain: inner IRQ domain > * @msi_domain: MSI IRQ domain > * @lock: protect the msi_irq_in_use bitmap > * @msi_irq_in_use: bit map for assigned MSI IRQ > @@ -190,7 +189,6 @@ struct mtk_pcie_port { > u32 slot; > int irq; > struct irq_domain *irq_domain; > - struct irq_domain *inner_domain; > struct irq_domain *msi_domain; > struct mutex lock; > DECLARE_BITMAP(msi_irq_in_use, MTK_MSI_IRQS_NUM); > @@ -418,22 +416,25 @@ static void mtk_msi_ack_irq(struct irq_data *data) > u32 hwirq = data->hwirq; > > writel(1 << hwirq, port->base + PCIE_IMSI_STATUS); > + writel(MSI_STATUS, port->base + PCIE_INT_STATUS); > } > > -static struct irq_chip mtk_msi_bottom_irq_chip = { > - .name = "MTK MSI", > +static struct irq_chip mtk_msi_irq_chip = { > + .name = "MTK PCIe", > .irq_compose_msi_msg = mtk_compose_msi_msg, > + .irq_write_msi_msg = pci_msi_domain_write_msg, > .irq_set_affinity = mtk_msi_set_affinity, > .irq_ack = mtk_msi_ack_irq, > + .irq_mask = pci_msi_mask_irq, > + .irq_unmask = pci_msi_unmask_irq, > }; (...omitted...) To keep the patch simple, we don't need to adjust the position for mtk_msi_irq_chip. > - > -static struct irq_chip mtk_msi_irq_chip = { > - .name = "MTK PCIe MSI", > - .irq_ack = irq_chip_ack_parent, > - .irq_mask = pci_msi_mask_irq, > - .irq_unmask = pci_msi_unmask_irq, > +static struct msi_domain_ops mtk_msi_domain_ops = { > + .get_hwirq = mtk_pcie_msi_get_hwirq, > + .msi_free = mtk_pcie_msi_free, > }; > > static struct msi_domain_info mtk_msi_domain_info = { > - .flags = (MSI_FLAG_USE_DEF_DOM_OPS | MSI_FLAG_USE_DEF_CHIP_OPS | > - MSI_FLAG_PCI_MSIX), > - .chip = &mtk_msi_irq_chip, > + .flags = (MSI_FLAG_USE_DEF_DOM_OPS | > + MSI_FLAG_USE_DEF_CHIP_OPS | MSI_FLAG_PCI_MSIX), > + .ops = &mtk_msi_domain_ops, > + .chip = &mtk_msi_irq_chip, > + .handler = handle_edge_irq, > + .handler_name = "MSI", > }; >
On Tue, 2019-01-22 at 11:35 +0800, Ryder Lee wrote: > On Mon, 2019-01-21 at 19:59 +0800, Jianjun Wang wrote: > > There is no need to create the inner domain as a parent for MSI domian, > > some feature has been implemented by MSI framework. > > > > Remove the inner domain and its irq chip, it will be more closer to the > > hardware implementation. > > > > Signed-off-by: Jianjun Wang <jianjun.wang@mediatek.com> > > --- > > drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mediatek.c | 82 +++++++++++--------------- > > 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mediatek.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mediatek.c > > index 8d05df56158b..216e6fa8aec0 100644 > > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mediatek.c > > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mediatek.c > > @@ -169,7 +169,6 @@ struct mtk_pcie_soc { > > * @slot: port slot > > * @irq: GIC irq > > * @irq_domain: legacy INTx IRQ domain > > - * @inner_domain: inner IRQ domain > > * @msi_domain: MSI IRQ domain > > * @lock: protect the msi_irq_in_use bitmap > > * @msi_irq_in_use: bit map for assigned MSI IRQ > > @@ -190,7 +189,6 @@ struct mtk_pcie_port { > > u32 slot; > > int irq; > > struct irq_domain *irq_domain; > > - struct irq_domain *inner_domain; > > struct irq_domain *msi_domain; > > struct mutex lock; > > DECLARE_BITMAP(msi_irq_in_use, MTK_MSI_IRQS_NUM); > > @@ -418,22 +416,25 @@ static void mtk_msi_ack_irq(struct irq_data *data) > > u32 hwirq = data->hwirq; > > > > writel(1 << hwirq, port->base + PCIE_IMSI_STATUS); > > + writel(MSI_STATUS, port->base + PCIE_INT_STATUS); > > } > > > > -static struct irq_chip mtk_msi_bottom_irq_chip = { > > - .name = "MTK MSI", > > +static struct irq_chip mtk_msi_irq_chip = { > > + .name = "MTK PCIe", > > .irq_compose_msi_msg = mtk_compose_msi_msg, > > + .irq_write_msi_msg = pci_msi_domain_write_msg, > > .irq_set_affinity = mtk_msi_set_affinity, > > .irq_ack = mtk_msi_ack_irq, > > + .irq_mask = pci_msi_mask_irq, > > + .irq_unmask = pci_msi_unmask_irq, > > }; > > (...omitted...) > > To keep the patch simple, we don't need to adjust the position for > mtk_msi_irq_chip. OK, I will fix it in next version, thanks. > > > - > > -static struct irq_chip mtk_msi_irq_chip = { > > - .name = "MTK PCIe MSI", > > - .irq_ack = irq_chip_ack_parent, > > - .irq_mask = pci_msi_mask_irq, > > - .irq_unmask = pci_msi_unmask_irq, > > +static struct msi_domain_ops mtk_msi_domain_ops = { > > + .get_hwirq = mtk_pcie_msi_get_hwirq, > > + .msi_free = mtk_pcie_msi_free, > > }; > > > > static struct msi_domain_info mtk_msi_domain_info = { > > - .flags = (MSI_FLAG_USE_DEF_DOM_OPS | MSI_FLAG_USE_DEF_CHIP_OPS | > > - MSI_FLAG_PCI_MSIX), > > - .chip = &mtk_msi_irq_chip, > > + .flags = (MSI_FLAG_USE_DEF_DOM_OPS | > > + MSI_FLAG_USE_DEF_CHIP_OPS | MSI_FLAG_PCI_MSIX), > > + .ops = &mtk_msi_domain_ops, > > + .chip = &mtk_msi_irq_chip, > > + .handler = handle_edge_irq, > > + .handler_name = "MSI", > > }; > > > >
diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mediatek.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mediatek.c index 8d05df56158b..216e6fa8aec0 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mediatek.c +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mediatek.c @@ -169,7 +169,6 @@ struct mtk_pcie_soc { * @slot: port slot * @irq: GIC irq * @irq_domain: legacy INTx IRQ domain - * @inner_domain: inner IRQ domain * @msi_domain: MSI IRQ domain * @lock: protect the msi_irq_in_use bitmap * @msi_irq_in_use: bit map for assigned MSI IRQ @@ -190,7 +189,6 @@ struct mtk_pcie_port { u32 slot; int irq; struct irq_domain *irq_domain; - struct irq_domain *inner_domain; struct irq_domain *msi_domain; struct mutex lock; DECLARE_BITMAP(msi_irq_in_use, MTK_MSI_IRQS_NUM); @@ -418,22 +416,25 @@ static void mtk_msi_ack_irq(struct irq_data *data) u32 hwirq = data->hwirq; writel(1 << hwirq, port->base + PCIE_IMSI_STATUS); + writel(MSI_STATUS, port->base + PCIE_INT_STATUS); } -static struct irq_chip mtk_msi_bottom_irq_chip = { - .name = "MTK MSI", +static struct irq_chip mtk_msi_irq_chip = { + .name = "MTK PCIe", .irq_compose_msi_msg = mtk_compose_msi_msg, + .irq_write_msi_msg = pci_msi_domain_write_msg, .irq_set_affinity = mtk_msi_set_affinity, .irq_ack = mtk_msi_ack_irq, + .irq_mask = pci_msi_mask_irq, + .irq_unmask = pci_msi_unmask_irq, }; -static int mtk_pcie_irq_domain_alloc(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int virq, - unsigned int nr_irqs, void *args) +static irq_hw_number_t mtk_pcie_msi_get_hwirq(struct msi_domain_info *info, + msi_alloc_info_t *arg) { - struct mtk_pcie_port *port = domain->host_data; - unsigned long bit; + struct mtk_pcie_port *port = info->chip_data; + irq_hw_number_t bit; - WARN_ON(nr_irqs != 1); mutex_lock(&port->lock); bit = find_first_zero_bit(port->msi_irq_in_use, MTK_MSI_IRQS_NUM); @@ -446,18 +447,14 @@ static int mtk_pcie_irq_domain_alloc(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int vir mutex_unlock(&port->lock); - irq_domain_set_info(domain, virq, bit, &mtk_msi_bottom_irq_chip, - domain->host_data, handle_edge_irq, - NULL, NULL); - - return 0; + return bit; } -static void mtk_pcie_irq_domain_free(struct irq_domain *domain, - unsigned int virq, unsigned int nr_irqs) +static void mtk_pcie_msi_free(struct irq_domain *domain, + struct msi_domain_info *info, unsigned int virq) { struct irq_data *d = irq_domain_get_irq_data(domain, virq); - struct mtk_pcie_port *port = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d); + struct mtk_pcie_port *port = info->chip_data; mutex_lock(&port->lock); @@ -468,46 +465,40 @@ static void mtk_pcie_irq_domain_free(struct irq_domain *domain, __clear_bit(d->hwirq, port->msi_irq_in_use); mutex_unlock(&port->lock); - - irq_domain_free_irqs_parent(domain, virq, nr_irqs); } -static const struct irq_domain_ops msi_domain_ops = { - .alloc = mtk_pcie_irq_domain_alloc, - .free = mtk_pcie_irq_domain_free, -}; - -static struct irq_chip mtk_msi_irq_chip = { - .name = "MTK PCIe MSI", - .irq_ack = irq_chip_ack_parent, - .irq_mask = pci_msi_mask_irq, - .irq_unmask = pci_msi_unmask_irq, +static struct msi_domain_ops mtk_msi_domain_ops = { + .get_hwirq = mtk_pcie_msi_get_hwirq, + .msi_free = mtk_pcie_msi_free, }; static struct msi_domain_info mtk_msi_domain_info = { - .flags = (MSI_FLAG_USE_DEF_DOM_OPS | MSI_FLAG_USE_DEF_CHIP_OPS | - MSI_FLAG_PCI_MSIX), - .chip = &mtk_msi_irq_chip, + .flags = (MSI_FLAG_USE_DEF_DOM_OPS | + MSI_FLAG_USE_DEF_CHIP_OPS | MSI_FLAG_PCI_MSIX), + .ops = &mtk_msi_domain_ops, + .chip = &mtk_msi_irq_chip, + .handler = handle_edge_irq, + .handler_name = "MSI", }; static int mtk_pcie_allocate_msi_domains(struct mtk_pcie_port *port) { - struct fwnode_handle *fwnode = of_node_to_fwnode(port->pcie->dev->of_node); + struct device *dev = port->pcie->dev; + struct fwnode_handle *fwnode = of_node_to_fwnode(dev->of_node); + struct msi_domain_info *info; mutex_init(&port->lock); - port->inner_domain = irq_domain_create_linear(fwnode, MTK_MSI_IRQS_NUM, - &msi_domain_ops, port); - if (!port->inner_domain) { - dev_err(port->pcie->dev, "failed to create IRQ domain\n"); + info = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*info), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!info) return -ENOMEM; - } - port->msi_domain = pci_msi_create_irq_domain(fwnode, &mtk_msi_domain_info, - port->inner_domain); + memcpy(info, &mtk_msi_domain_info, sizeof(*info)); + info->chip_data = port; + + port->msi_domain = pci_msi_create_irq_domain(fwnode, info, NULL); if (!port->msi_domain) { - dev_err(port->pcie->dev, "failed to create MSI domain\n"); - irq_domain_remove(port->inner_domain); + dev_err(dev, "failed to create MSI domain\n"); return -ENOMEM; } @@ -541,8 +532,6 @@ static void mtk_pcie_irq_teardown(struct mtk_pcie *pcie) if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PCI_MSI)) { if (port->msi_domain) irq_domain_remove(port->msi_domain); - if (port->inner_domain) - irq_domain_remove(port->inner_domain); } irq_dispose_mapping(port->irq); @@ -619,12 +608,11 @@ static void mtk_pcie_intr_handler(struct irq_desc *desc) while ((imsi_status = readl(port->base + PCIE_IMSI_STATUS))) { for_each_set_bit(bit, &imsi_status, MTK_MSI_IRQS_NUM) { - virq = irq_find_mapping(port->inner_domain, bit); + virq = irq_find_mapping( + port->msi_domain, bit); generic_handle_irq(virq); } } - /* Clear MSI interrupt status */ - writel(MSI_STATUS, port->base + PCIE_INT_STATUS); } }
There is no need to create the inner domain as a parent for MSI domian, some feature has been implemented by MSI framework. Remove the inner domain and its irq chip, it will be more closer to the hardware implementation. Signed-off-by: Jianjun Wang <jianjun.wang@mediatek.com> --- drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mediatek.c | 82 +++++++++++--------------- 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)