From patchwork Fri Apr 22 07:52:33 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: =?utf-8?b?UmV4LUJDIENoZW4gKOmZs+afj+i+sCk=?= X-Patchwork-Id: 12823057 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 468FEC433EF for ; Fri, 22 Apr 2022 08:08:24 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Date:Subject:CC:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=rAGHiUhRtNLDbG9E8BG0E1xnN5Av10RvSalSXYnuU5o=; b=Lt52khfS4Kj+Ze FOmdSvWkIZUMAVcb1RYfin+SuMbLkhg2mJIeLrZZoFJ5AL3cP5hvCGtDFt1om27rtpD4BagGrXVwg dgEgilSeSG86AAajzqptEFG3Byi5Ka68J/PBsjGluNv+SRDZ9RbmAG0tLpOtEQIZ+Sk0dOpqjbdie 3y8jA2Ah3Zp8D188candmGMk+Z8F/rM2bqVa0Q3vIB/ApltseuFiIYxLStNHYnkHJ9hxZ73AbzXBG VfKVL3mvZ6jKmfBT3p2xKliXzs2Phe7LQGKKpY36/NsntJzTQMTWdkjxOs4fydjVQQGC24ANwpxdC 1bVvjf7BaaVWQb6369wg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1nhoKw-00H7hc-Go; Fri, 22 Apr 2022 08:08:18 +0000 Received: from mailgw01.mediatek.com ([216.200.240.184]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1nhoFc-00H5DN-Fe; Fri, 22 Apr 2022 08:02:50 +0000 X-UUID: 6d6b24856a4c401a81b58214dc00713a-20220422 X-CID-P-RULE: Release_Ham X-CID-O-INFO: VERSION:1.1.4, REQID:32c97f38-7b28-4515-9cc8-b69bf7fb7f62, OB:0, LO B:0,IP:0,URL:0,TC:0,Content:0,EDM:0,RT:0,SF:0,FILE:0,RULE:Release_Ham,ACTI ON:release,TS:0 X-CID-META: VersionHash:faefae9, CLOUDID:e2b9c1ef-06b0-4305-bfbf-554bfc9d151a, C OID:IGNORED,Recheck:0,SF:nil,TC:nil,Content:0,EDM:-3,File:nil,QS:0,BEC:nil X-UUID: 6d6b24856a4c401a81b58214dc00713a-20220422 Received: from mtkcas66.mediatek.inc [(172.29.193.44)] by mailgw01.mediatek.com (envelope-from ) (musrelay.mediatek.com ESMTP with TLSv1.2 ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 256/256) with ESMTP id 793777669; Fri, 22 Apr 2022 01:02:45 -0700 Received: from mtkmbs10n1.mediatek.inc (172.21.101.34) by MTKMBS62N2.mediatek.inc (172.29.193.42) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Fri, 22 Apr 2022 00:52:48 -0700 Received: from mtkcas11.mediatek.inc (172.21.101.40) by mtkmbs10n1.mediatek.inc (172.21.101.34) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384) id 15.2.792.15; Fri, 22 Apr 2022 15:52:46 +0800 Received: from mtksdccf07.mediatek.inc (172.21.84.99) by mtkcas11.mediatek.inc (172.21.101.73) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 15.0.1497.2 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 22 Apr 2022 15:52:46 +0800 From: Rex-BC Chen To: , , , , CC: , , , , , , , , , , , Rex-BC Chen Subject: [PATCH V4 08/14] cpufreq: mediatek: Make sram regulator optional Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2022 15:52:33 +0800 Message-ID: <20220422075239.16437-9-rex-bc.chen@mediatek.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.18.0 In-Reply-To: <20220422075239.16437-1-rex-bc.chen@mediatek.com> References: <20220422075239.16437-1-rex-bc.chen@mediatek.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MTK: N X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20220422_010248_643685_0807528A X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 11.71 ) X-BeenThere: linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "Linux-mediatek" Errors-To: linux-mediatek-bounces+linux-mediatek=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org From: Jia-Wei Chang For some MediaTek SoCs, like MT8186, it's possible that the sram regulator is shared between CPU and CCI. We hope regulator framework can return error for error handling rather than a dummy handler from regulator_get api. Therefore, we choose to use regulator_get_optional. Signed-off-by: Jia-Wei Chang Signed-off-by: Rex-BC Chen Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno --- drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq.c index 0b2ca0c8eddc..97ce96421241 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq.c @@ -438,7 +438,7 @@ static int mtk_cpu_dvfs_info_init(struct mtk_cpu_dvfs_info *info, int cpu) } /* Both presence and absence of sram regulator are valid cases. */ - info->sram_reg = regulator_get_exclusive(cpu_dev, "sram"); + info->sram_reg = regulator_get_optional(cpu_dev, "sram"); if (IS_ERR(info->sram_reg)) info->sram_reg = NULL; else {