Message ID | 20210710002441.167759-1-mike.kravetz@oracle.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | hugetlb: fix potential ref counting races | expand |
Any additional comments on these patches/this approach? The first patch addressing this issue actually went into the 5.14 merge window as commit 7118fc2906e2 ("hugetlb: address ref count racing in prep_compound_gigantic_page"). All this code is very tricky and subtle. It addresses potential issues discovered by code analysis. I do not believe the races have ever been experienced in practice. If anyone has suggestions for a simpler or alternative approach, I would love to hear them.
On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 7:41 AM Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> wrote: > > Any additional comments on these patches/this approach? > > The first patch addressing this issue actually went into the 5.14 merge > window as commit 7118fc2906e2 ("hugetlb: address ref count racing in > prep_compound_gigantic_page"). > > All this code is very tricky and subtle. It addresses potential issues > discovered by code analysis. I do not believe the races have ever been > experienced in practice. If anyone has suggestions for a simpler or > alternative approach, I would love to hear them. Hi Mike, I agree with you that this code is very tricky and subtle. I have looked at this patch set. For me, I cannot figure out a better solution for this race. -- Thanks, Muchun > -- > Mike Kravetz > > > On 7/9/21 5:24 PM, Mike Kravetz wrote: > > When Muchun Song brought up a potential issue with hugetlb ref counting[1], > > I started looking closer at the code. hugetlbfs is the only code with it's > > own specialized compound page destructor and taking special action when ref > > counts drop to zero. Potential races happen in this unique handling of ref > > counts. The following patches address these races when creating and > > destroying hugetlb pages. > > > > These potential races have likely existed since the creation of > > hugetlbfs. They certainly have been around for more than 10 years. > > However, I am unaware of anyone actually hitting these races. It is > > VERY unlikely than anyone will actually hit these races, but they do > > exist. > > > > I could not think of an easy (or difficult) way to force these races. > > Therefore, testing consisted of adding code to randomly increase ref > > counts in strategic places. In this way, I was able to exercise all the > > race handling code paths. > > > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/CAMZfGtVMn3daKrJwZMaVOGOaJU+B4dS--x_oPmGQMD=c=QNGEg@mail.gmail.com/ > > > > Mike Kravetz (3): > > hugetlb: simplify prep_compound_gigantic_page ref count racing code > > hugetlb: drop ref count earlier after page allocation > > hugetlb: before freeing hugetlb page set dtor to appropriate value > > > > mm/hugetlb.c | 137 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------- > > 1 file changed, 104 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-) > >