Message ID | 20220120155517.066795336@infradead.org (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | sched: User Managed Concurrency Groups | expand |
On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 8:09 AM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote: > > Latest version, many changes since last time, still under heavy discussion. Thanks! I'll work on testing/integrating this patchset. I'll also assume that my changes that added blocked worker list (https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220113233940.3608440-5-posk@google.com/) and server kicking (https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220113233940.3608440-6-posk@google.com/) are acceptable. [...]
On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 09:28:11AM -0800, Peter Oskolkov wrote: > On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 8:09 AM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote: > > > > Latest version, many changes since last time, still under heavy discussion. > > Thanks! I'll work on testing/integrating this patchset. I'll also > assume that my changes that added blocked worker list > (https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220113233940.3608440-5-posk@google.com/) So the blocked list I don't mind, but I'm not sure about the use-case you mentioned... it gets a mess vs PE, but I see why you'd want it, so i need to think about it more. > and server kicking > (https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220113233940.3608440-6-posk@google.com/) > are acceptable. Still need to look at the server kicking thing...
On Thu, 20 Jan 2022 16:55:17 +0100 Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote: > Latest version, many changes since last time, still under heavy discussion. > > Seems to work with the test-case I have (below), but that still has a few gaps, > coverage wise. Nice work, Peter. > > Still haven't done the SMP wakeup thing, finally get the idea with > worker-timeouts but haven't yet implemented that. > > Happy hacking.. > > ---- > Should the below be added to samples/ ? -- Steve > #define _GNU_SOURCE > #include <unistd.h> > #include <sys/types.h> > #include <sys/syscall.h> > #include <pthread.h> > #include <stdio.h> > #include <stdlib.h> > #include <errno.h> > #include <signal.h> [..]
On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 01:01:45PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> Should the below be added to samples/ ?
Maybe eventually, it needs a little TLC to build with clang at the very
least.