From patchwork Wed Jun 22 08:25:01 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" X-Patchwork-Id: 12890289 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F821C433EF for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2022 08:26:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 95D178E0087; Wed, 22 Jun 2022 04:26:25 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 8E6F48E0088; Wed, 22 Jun 2022 04:26:25 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 7870F8E0087; Wed, 22 Jun 2022 04:26:25 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0016.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.16]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6925D8E0083 for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2022 04:26:25 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin20.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay11.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 211C281101 for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2022 08:26:14 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 79605189468.20.FA5C031 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) by imf10.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1C25C000D for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2022 08:26:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pps.filterd (m0127361.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 25M8EPxG008931; Wed, 22 Jun 2022 08:25:34 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=B9mNmKRCVubcAIBUHo4IDhsLiDc0BiR+a6oORHIusXc=; b=CakoxcRwEJAy0+pqJ2CDkoZZXWoTNU6T8qjT+bR9yUHQtVs+J0zf2aHamERkJ2aN7Wng odws8TtNB/DJomGM+vBryYP4U5RTWD2BH5ybLKqXQx0zdoHm6pfC5hGnjxt520NjygT9 5P0KL47TnWqqso73/09iG0svQ8h96O/20k3n/wYCX9mymCiR0+lQCnf8d7c0WwShj19h Yj8sce3KHexpNFhEqIjvFiM1mXt4LnoocFUBLXNEoiKbfuKyQHER7B6ebkkX7xkf/c+k knLMZyOU9Zy3DgzGO+/PmjGwxASlLEWK86GKaHlbisG6glzVWlpn4L82KUIHAursJTqG dw== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3guycvg8k8-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 22 Jun 2022 08:25:33 +0000 Received: from m0127361.ppops.net (m0127361.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 25M8FGNL010980; Wed, 22 Jun 2022 08:25:33 GMT Received: from ppma04wdc.us.ibm.com (1a.90.2fa9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.47.144.26]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3guycvg8k1-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 22 Jun 2022 08:25:33 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma04wdc.us.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma04wdc.us.ibm.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 25M8KMvv009297; Wed, 22 Jun 2022 08:25:32 GMT Received: from b03cxnp08025.gho.boulder.ibm.com (b03cxnp08025.gho.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.130.17]) by ppma04wdc.us.ibm.com with ESMTP id 3gs6b9s9ke-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 22 Jun 2022 08:25:32 +0000 Received: from b03ledav001.gho.boulder.ibm.com (b03ledav001.gho.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.130.232]) by b03cxnp08025.gho.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 25M8PVTE26083830 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 22 Jun 2022 08:25:31 GMT Received: from b03ledav001.gho.boulder.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A4B76E056; Wed, 22 Jun 2022 08:25:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b03ledav001.gho.boulder.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43C296E04E; Wed, 22 Jun 2022 08:25:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from skywalker.ibmuc.com (unknown [9.43.69.226]) by b03ledav001.gho.boulder.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Jun 2022 08:25:25 +0000 (GMT) From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" To: linux-mm@kvack.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org Cc: Wei Xu , Huang Ying , Yang Shi , Davidlohr Bueso , Tim C Chen , Michal Hocko , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Hesham Almatary , Dave Hansen , Jonathan Cameron , Alistair Popple , Dan Williams , "Aneesh Kumar K.V" Subject: [PATCH v7 00/12] mm/demotion: Memory tiers and demotion Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2022 13:55:01 +0530 Message-Id: <20220622082513.467538-1-aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.36.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-GUID: MJSlZhqRTHpsP1qwUnep11svk8MiqDjW X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: EcJESGMJZa3aoKhGeaL4lsNrJMiNNYdh X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.205,Aquarius:18.0.883,Hydra:6.0.517,FMLib:17.11.64.514 definitions=2022-06-21_11,2022-06-22_01,2022-02-23_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 suspectscore=0 adultscore=0 clxscore=1015 mlxlogscore=999 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 spamscore=0 priorityscore=1501 phishscore=0 malwarescore=0 bulkscore=0 mlxscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2204290000 definitions=main-2206220039 ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-20220608; d=hostedemail.com; t=1655886367; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=gfirxrMTaUVoQ9hWMwBge/jSgzAdwocLBRcohoinTC2ia7wSld2cznCfF8Qc0UQN8Wiibs jA0lNFfIixbXXPyh8Sv1AqasOmR2VJChywBXLROQ8fS6liXy3yU1b1ggw3lt6pVZNOWFBW ntJFEU8XP7SCTUQ70JAt66bfwYWQNmk= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; t=1655886367; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:references:dkim-signature; bh=B9mNmKRCVubcAIBUHo4IDhsLiDc0BiR+a6oORHIusXc=; b=5U7YV3gnG8XCQ1K4jjXzZIT7+9FWoRBGwreTkS3kEPx4/zX7jgb1OwTsaIn7p8iIUlm479 kZxFOmd3QftnYuHNOpYTa/1Yv5ZqsLD/ms0HiIfNTCXfHLRVFUw1C3DBW2rGp5AXqocl3f A579Xw1AGmtNTZakxW2lWpHrvfgz3mg= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; imf10.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=ibm.com header.s=pp1 header.b=CakoxcRw; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=ibm.com; spf=pass (imf10.hostedemail.com: domain of aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com designates 148.163.158.5 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com X-Rspam-User: X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: A1C25C000D Authentication-Results: imf10.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=ibm.com header.s=pp1 header.b=CakoxcRw; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=ibm.com; spf=pass (imf10.hostedemail.com: domain of aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com designates 148.163.158.5 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com X-Stat-Signature: 3sxi8w1udifqqntumxo9d7grh4ghkyn3 X-Rspamd-Server: rspam09 X-HE-Tag: 1655886366-322368 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: The current kernel has the basic memory tiering support: Inactive pages on a higher tier NUMA node can be migrated (demoted) to a lower tier NUMA node to make room for new allocations on the higher tier NUMA node. Frequently accessed pages on a lower tier NUMA node can be migrated (promoted) to a higher tier NUMA node to improve the performance. In the current kernel, memory tiers are defined implicitly via a demotion path relationship between NUMA nodes, which is created during the kernel initialization and updated when a NUMA node is hot-added or hot-removed. The current implementation puts all nodes with CPU into the top tier, and builds the tier hierarchy tier-by-tier by establishing the per-node demotion targets based on the distances between nodes. This current memory tier kernel interface needs to be improved for several important use cases: * The current tier initialization code always initializes each memory-only NUMA node into a lower tier. But a memory-only NUMA node may have a high performance memory device (e.g. a DRAM device attached via CXL.mem or a DRAM-backed memory-only node on a virtual machine) and should be put into a higher tier. * The current tier hierarchy always puts CPU nodes into the top tier. But on a system with HBM (e.g. GPU memory) devices, these memory-only HBM NUMA nodes should be in the top tier, and DRAM nodes with CPUs are better to be placed into the next lower tier. * Also because the current tier hierarchy always puts CPU nodes into the top tier, when a CPU is hot-added (or hot-removed) and triggers a memory node from CPU-less into a CPU node (or vice versa), the memory tier hierarchy gets changed, even though no memory node is added or removed. This can make the tier hierarchy unstable and make it difficult to support tier-based memory accounting. * A higher tier node can only be demoted to selected nodes on the next lower tier as defined by the demotion path, not any other node from any lower tier. This strict, hard-coded demotion order does not work in all use cases (e.g. some use cases may want to allow cross-socket demotion to another node in the same demotion tier as a fallback when the preferred demotion node is out of space), and has resulted in the feature request for an interface to override the system-wide, per-node demotion order from the userspace. This demotion order is also inconsistent with the page allocation fallback order when all the nodes in a higher tier are out of space: The page allocation can fall back to any node from any lower tier, whereas the demotion order doesn't allow that. * There are no interfaces for the userspace to learn about the memory tier hierarchy in order to optimize its memory allocations. This patch series make the creation of memory tiers explicit under the control of userspace or device driver. Memory Tier Initialization ========================== By default, all memory nodes are assigned to the default tier with tier ID value 200. A device driver can move up or down its memory nodes from the default tier. For example, PMEM can move down its memory nodes below the default tier, whereas GPU can move up its memory nodes above the default tier. The kernel initialization code makes the decision on which exact tier a memory node should be assigned to based on the requests from the device drivers as well as the memory device hardware information provided by the firmware. Hot-adding/removing CPUs doesn't affect memory tier hierarchy. Memory Allocation for Demotion ============================== This patch series keep the demotion target page allocation logic same. The demotion page allocation pick the closest NUMA node in the next lower tier to the current NUMA node allocating pages from. This will be later improved to use the same page allocation strategy using fallback list. Sysfs Interface: ------------- Listing current list of memory tiers details: :/sys/devices/system/memtier$ ls default_tier max_tier memtier1 power uevent :/sys/devices/system/memtier$ cat default_tier memtier200 :/sys/devices/system/memtier$ cat max_tier 400 :/sys/devices/system/memtier$ Per node memory tier details: For a cpu only NUMA node: :/sys/devices/system/node# cat node0/memtier :/sys/devices/system/node# echo 1 > node0/memtier :/sys/devices/system/node# cat node0/memtier :/sys/devices/system/node# For a NUMA node with memory: :/sys/devices/system/node# cat node1/memtier 1 :/sys/devices/system/node# ls ../memtier/ default_tier max_tier memtier1 power uevent :/sys/devices/system/node# echo 2 > node1/memtier :/sys/devices/system/node# :/sys/devices/system/node# ls ../memtier/ default_tier max_tier memtier1 memtier2 power uevent :/sys/devices/system/node# cat node1/memtier 2 :/sys/devices/system/node# Removing a memory tier :/sys/devices/system/node# cat node1/memtier 2 :/sys/devices/system/node# echo 1 > node1/memtier :/sys/devices/system/node# :/sys/devices/system/node# cat node1/memtier 1 :/sys/devices/system/node# :/sys/devices/system/node# ls ../memtier/ default_tier max_tier memtier1 power uevent :/sys/devices/system/node# The above resulted in removal of memtier2 which was created in the earlier step. Changes from v6: * Drop the usage of rank. * Address other review feedback. Changes from v5: * Remove patch supporting N_MEMORY node removal from memory tiers. memory tiers are going to be used for features other than demotion. Hence keep all N_MEMORY nodes in memory tiers irrespective of whether they want to participate in promotion or demotion. * Add NODE_DATA->memtier * Rearrage patches to add sysfs files later. * Add support to create memory tiers from userspace. * Address other review feedback. Changes from v4: * Address review feedback. * Reverse the meaning of "rank": higher rank value means higher tier. * Add "/sys/devices/system/memtier/default_tier". * Add node_is_toptier v4: Add support for explicit memory tiers and ranks. v3: - Modify patch 1 subject to make it more specific - Remove /sys/kernel/mm/numa/demotion_targets interface, use /sys/devices/system/node/demotion_targets instead and make it writable to override node_states[N_DEMOTION_TARGETS]. - Add support to view per node demotion targets via sysfs v2: In v1, only 1st patch of this patch series was sent, which was implemented to avoid some of the limitations on the demotion target sharing, however for certain numa topology, the demotion targets found by that patch was not most optimal, so 1st patch in this series is modified according to suggestions from Huang and Baolin. Different examples of demotion list comparasion between existing implementation and changed implementation can be found in the commit message of 1st patch. Aneesh Kumar K.V (10): mm/demotion: Add support for explicit memory tiers mm/demotion: Move memory demotion related code mm/demotion/dax/kmem: Set node's memory tier to MEMORY_TIER_PMEM mm/demotion: Add hotplug callbacks to handle new numa node onlined mm/demotion: Build demotion targets based on explicit memory tiers mm/demotion: Expose memory tier details via sysfs mm/demotion: Add per node memory tier attribute to sysfs mm/demotion: Add pg_data_t member to track node memory tier details mm/demotion: Update node_is_toptier to work with memory tiers mm/demotion: Add sysfs ABI documentation Jagdish Gediya (2): mm/demotion: Demote pages according to allocation fallback order mm/demotion: Add documentation for memory tiering .../ABI/testing/sysfs-kernel-mm-memory-tiers | 61 ++ Documentation/admin-guide/mm/index.rst | 1 + .../admin-guide/mm/memory-tiering.rst | 182 ++++ drivers/base/node.c | 42 + drivers/dax/kmem.c | 6 +- include/linux/memory-tiers.h | 72 ++ include/linux/migrate.h | 15 - include/linux/mmzone.h | 3 + include/linux/node.h | 5 - mm/Makefile | 1 + mm/huge_memory.c | 1 + mm/memory-tiers.c | 791 ++++++++++++++++++ mm/migrate.c | 453 +--------- mm/mprotect.c | 1 + mm/vmscan.c | 57 +- mm/vmstat.c | 4 - 16 files changed, 1204 insertions(+), 491 deletions(-) create mode 100644 Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-kernel-mm-memory-tiers create mode 100644 Documentation/admin-guide/mm/memory-tiering.rst create mode 100644 include/linux/memory-tiers.h create mode 100644 mm/memory-tiers.c