Message ID | 20230216051750.3125598-1-surenb@google.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | Per-VMA locks | expand |
Here are some measurements from a Pixel 7 Pro that´s running a kernel either with the Per-VMA locks patchset or without. If there´s interest I can provide results of other specific apps as well. Results are from consecutive cold app launches issued with "am start" command spawning the main activity of Slack Android app. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1ktujfcyDmIJoQMWsoizGIE-0A_jMS9VMw_seehUY9s0/edit?usp=sharing There´s quite a noticeable improvement, as can be seen in the graph. The results were reproducible. If you have any questions feel free to ask.
On Fri, 24 Feb 2023, freak07 wrote: >Here are some measurements from a Pixel 7 Pro that´s running a kernel either with the Per-VMA locks patchset or without. >If there´s interest I can provide results of other specific apps as well. > >Results are from consecutive cold app launches issued with "am start" command spawning the main activity of Slack Android app. > >https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1ktujfcyDmIJoQMWsoizGIE-0A_jMS9VMw_seehUY9s0/edit?usp=sharing > >There´s quite a noticeable improvement, as can be seen in the graph. The results were reproducible. Thanks for sharing. I am not surprised - after all, per-vma locks narrow some of the performance gaps between vanilla and speculative pfs, with less complexity (albeit this is now a 35 patch series :). Thanks, Davidlohr
On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 9:19 AM Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> wrote: > > On Fri, 24 Feb 2023, freak07 wrote: > > >Here are some measurements from a Pixel 7 Pro that´s running a kernel either with the Per-VMA locks patchset or without. > >If there´s interest I can provide results of other specific apps as well. > > > >Results are from consecutive cold app launches issued with "am start" command spawning the main activity of Slack Android app. > > > >https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1ktujfcyDmIJoQMWsoizGIE-0A_jMS9VMw_seehUY9s0/edit?usp=sharing > > > >There´s quite a noticeable improvement, as can be seen in the graph. The results were reproducible. > > Thanks for sharing. I am not surprised - after all, per-vma locks narrow some of the performance gaps > between vanilla and speculative pfs, with less complexity (albeit this is now a 35 patch series :). Yes, depending on the specific app we would expect some launch time improvement (in this case average improvement is 7%). Thanks for sharing the numbers! I'll be posting v4 today, which is a 33 patch series now, so a bit better :) Thanks, Suren. > > Thanks, > Davidlohr >