Message ID | 20231120084300.4368-1-osalvador@suse.de (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | page_owner: print stacks and their counter | expand |
On 11/20/23 09:42, Oscar Salvador wrote: > Changes v5 -> v6: > - Rebase on top of v6.7-rc1 Hi, I think at this point it would be better to rebase on top of https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1698077459.git.andreyknvl@google.com/ which already contains the refcount field in stack_record. (and maybe help with the review of that series as well? Hopefully it can get to mm/unstable and -next towards 6.8 soon :) Vlastimil
On Mon, Nov 20, 2023 at 10:07 AM Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> wrote: > > On 11/20/23 09:42, Oscar Salvador wrote: > > Changes v5 -> v6: > > - Rebase on top of v6.7-rc1 > > Hi, > > I think at this point it would be better to rebase on top of > https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1698077459.git.andreyknvl@google.com/ > which already contains the refcount field in stack_record. > (and maybe help with the review of that series as well? Hopefully it can get > to mm/unstable and -next towards 6.8 soon :) Yes, please; I just mailed a v4 that is based on v6.7-rc2: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/cover.1700502145.git.andreyknvl@google.com/T/#t You should also be able to use the new stack_depot_save_flags(STACK_DEPOT_FLAG_GET)/stack_depot_put API to keep only the relevant stack traces. Thank you!