diff mbox series

[4/6] x86/numa: concentrate the code of setting cpu to node map

Message ID 1551011649-30103-5-git-send-email-kernelfans@gmail.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series make memblock allocator utilize the node's fallback info | expand

Commit Message

Pingfan Liu Feb. 24, 2019, 12:34 p.m. UTC
Both numa_init_array() and init_cpu_to_node() aim at setting up the cpu to
node map, so combining them. And the coming patch will set up node to
cpumask map in the combined function.

Signed-off-by: Pingfan Liu <kernelfans@gmail.com>
CC: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
CC: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
CC: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
CC: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
CC: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
CC: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
CC: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
CC: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
CC: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
CC: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
CC: Petr Tesarik <ptesarik@suse.cz>
CC: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
CC: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
CC: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
CC: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
CC: Daniel Vacek <neelx@redhat.com>
CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
---
 arch/x86/mm/numa.c | 39 +++++++++++++--------------------------
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)

Comments

Dave Hansen Feb. 25, 2019, 3:25 p.m. UTC | #1
On 2/24/19 4:34 AM, Pingfan Liu wrote:
> -#else
> -static void __init numa_init_array(void) {}
> -#endif
> -
>  static int __init numa_init(int (*init_func)(void))
>  {
>  	int i;
> @@ -675,7 +651,6 @@ static int __init numa_init(int (*init_func)(void))
>  		if (!node_online(nid))
>  			numa_clear_node(i);
>  	}
> -	numa_init_array();
>  
>  	return 0;
>  }

Huh, and now the (stub) code that was just added gets removed?
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
index bfe6732..c8dd7af 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
@@ -599,30 +599,6 @@  static int __init numa_register_memblks(struct numa_meminfo *mi)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
-/*
- * There are unfortunately some poorly designed mainboards around that
- * only connect memory to a single CPU. This breaks the 1:1 cpu->node
- * mapping. To avoid this fill in the mapping for all possible CPUs,
- * as the number of CPUs is not known yet. We round robin the existing
- * nodes.
- */
-static void __init numa_init_array(void)
-{
-	int rr, i;
-
-	rr = first_node(node_online_map);
-	for (i = 0; i < nr_cpu_ids; i++) {
-		if (early_cpu_to_node(i) != NUMA_NO_NODE)
-			continue;
-		numa_set_node(i, rr);
-		rr = next_node_in(rr, node_online_map);
-	}
-}
-#else
-static void __init numa_init_array(void) {}
-#endif
-
 static int __init numa_init(int (*init_func)(void))
 {
 	int i;
@@ -675,7 +651,6 @@  static int __init numa_init(int (*init_func)(void))
 		if (!node_online(nid))
 			numa_clear_node(i);
 	}
-	numa_init_array();
 
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -758,14 +733,26 @@  void __init init_cpu_to_node(void)
 {
 	int cpu;
 	u16 *cpu_to_apicid = early_per_cpu_ptr(x86_cpu_to_apicid);
+	int rr;
 
 	BUG_ON(cpu_to_apicid == NULL);
+	rr = first_node(node_online_map);
 
 	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
 		int node = numa_cpu_node(cpu);
 
-		if (node == NUMA_NO_NODE)
+		/*
+		 * There are unfortunately some poorly designed mainboards
+		 * around that only connect memory to a single CPU. This
+		 * breaks the 1:1 cpu->node mapping. To avoid this fill in
+		 * the mapping for all possible CPUs, as the number of CPUs
+		 * is not known yet. We round robin the existing nodes.
+		 */
+		if (node == NUMA_NO_NODE) {
+			numa_set_node(cpu, rr);
+			rr = next_node_in(rr, node_online_map);
 			continue;
+		}
 
 		if (!node_online(node))
 			init_memory_less_node(node);