From patchwork Mon May 27 01:57:55 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Yang Shi X-Patchwork-Id: 10961979 Return-Path: Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 033686C5 for ; Mon, 27 May 2019 01:58:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E76FF28AB6 for ; Mon, 27 May 2019 01:58:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id D999F28AB8; Mon, 27 May 2019 01:58:25 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 099AB28AB6 for ; Mon, 27 May 2019 01:58:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 3564D6B0271; Sun, 26 May 2019 21:58:23 -0400 (EDT) Delivered-To: linux-mm-outgoing@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 30A136B0272; Sun, 26 May 2019 21:58:23 -0400 (EDT) X-Original-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 159566B0273; Sun, 26 May 2019 21:58:23 -0400 (EDT) X-Original-To: linux-mm@kvack.org X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from mail-pf1-f198.google.com (mail-pf1-f198.google.com [209.85.210.198]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD1BC6B0271 for ; Sun, 26 May 2019 21:58:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-pf1-f198.google.com with SMTP id 11so12243713pfb.4 for ; Sun, 26 May 2019 18:58:22 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-original-authentication-results:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references; bh=LP1sErBd2BR1zKVZ2zZNExqXOGfpDqRKSw19ANa0a6c=; b=Nkb5HFW8u1ROgNfp3WsvuLiw94Nc2JDdSJewMOf1kYyT6kBJeVtydP/wSzDyD5Ar1X iCA4sG6BEn00D//PxWdEnZbKWnhyH+ULQVpDs/GbZxnR1AhIirfBs3JZt7A7nfBr7FvV ybmYh1x8A7CwqO2+C97OmExQEVizeqVIQ/n8WJN/ZonfVIFPHLvmOBf8wEBbjz153Gds qen7dM9Ub2XDk3iouzBCK6j6jls/zy+En/uV0Y0VYCTK+FyqunUTbUM3mvVlLVQDitVL 42EK/HFJTxaeBFJaXJPj0F6sVNl2AVpDWrzhxxiH7nNL1oOMvdbSE5dQqpDqbL3Vd/+z O/Iw== X-Original-Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com designates 47.88.44.37 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=alibaba.com X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAX7ooEISYMEHHCFXeFSkjOTarjamIRm1yo4rm0QUpgc2pTtv26n +tsFP7btr6YjEkdnKAdw0XRIpN/QwUWj6Vz7XcaTqFywURMzGHGmlKGuggG5nyiDej02+BAJ80N fZb9/J80XRuQ3WQWylzuqGw/IQ2+LiqjiyQuxAM7Wb0luiG/5JeB2n6lX+FI8tErGDQ== X-Received: by 2002:a62:82c1:: with SMTP id w184mr18035315pfd.171.1558922302235; Sun, 26 May 2019 18:58:22 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzhjen/UTkxSvFFmY0gXThJnbzW69VMHCvE/qO2Yx87SHZy4xnNKn+dqKzD+nlJZD3No6uE X-Received: by 2002:a62:82c1:: with SMTP id w184mr18035232pfd.171.1558922300684; Sun, 26 May 2019 18:58:20 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1558922300; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=XuqVaSx7Dq6k+3StSS4zr5oZdeHH2Krx1l2iWCfx0EwIJaVdy/BOqL+AYEmhKHajRV J9+rRfBybC0OT7GKkv9FOgjQ9QO3GQNSxhgMGM12cHFAlYnMcznXh8fG3LDIl9YStxUt dvk062MVpv/U3er1GUfd1Ig9EOEhvW3qVs9Hbm6lkKJJO/LbO+WcjYJ1QAKQCHrsY2jW YVlm/VvFmX24zYJFVPWnB0x0vdI//HBYtVA2AKL00yHyKErS2HFQdVyFNX0R305gFznl 5hBc9JRxdGXFhTf6FZu+TIxLWooOjpPw/3opvihbUKZpA/QplZOEuZD1fDqUwB1V06wt nrPQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from; bh=LP1sErBd2BR1zKVZ2zZNExqXOGfpDqRKSw19ANa0a6c=; b=MAKL/22NZoCKaRMD0EfKxNFSi+UJkBzwa5XnXX1+WiFgOHkADaY0DzjnbX4AnDHExH 9pE4PCBEOPlo+l9ibIYqcCxb/1XbR++wp3v9AEDk0BayNXwUrm+X/4ICwXyue7sXFUL8 bxCbMdo3qwOEYwwLJvpkoNOC3FdB28HuNhrx9DWR6VkQ/788IeghJe8LvCdpGxs7fypA imGW+fuEPzQOU5MmfeC5zlrdaBuABYwRL3T8AZUjTILzgYU22dWA+6LvLRq3hxxJKAki 2ZyxVZhYwG54Bo1xs+cOnXe2lahxxjpjnIXWHa/XRBHlpaTlybCvgj9P0/QWlpUNukId IkPg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com designates 47.88.44.37 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=alibaba.com Received: from out4437.biz.mail.alibaba.com (out4437.biz.mail.alibaba.com. [47.88.44.37]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id o33si17462191pld.268.2019.05.26.18.58.19 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 26 May 2019 18:58:20 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com designates 47.88.44.37 as permitted sender) client-ip=47.88.44.37; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com designates 47.88.44.37 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=alibaba.com X-Alimail-AntiSpam: AC=PASS;BC=-1|-1;BR=01201311R561e4;CH=green;DM=||false|;FP=0|-1|-1|-1|0|-1|-1|-1;HT=e01e04395;MF=yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com;NM=1;PH=DS;RN=13;SR=0;TI=SMTPD_---0TSlLoRp_1558922275; Received: from e19h19392.et15sqa.tbsite.net(mailfrom:yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com fp:SMTPD_---0TSlLoRp_1558922275) by smtp.aliyun-inc.com(127.0.0.1); Mon, 27 May 2019 09:58:04 +0800 From: Yang Shi To: ying.huang@intel.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org, mhocko@suse.com, mgorman@techsingularity.net, kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com, josef@toxicpanda.com, hughd@google.com, shakeelb@google.com, hdanton@sina.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org Cc: yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [RESEND v5 PATCH 2/2] mm: vmscan: correct some vmscan counters for THP swapout Date: Mon, 27 May 2019 09:57:55 +0800 Message-Id: <1558922275-31782-2-git-send-email-yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.8.3.1 In-Reply-To: <1558922275-31782-1-git-send-email-yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com> References: <1558922275-31782-1-git-send-email-yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com> X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Since commit bd4c82c22c36 ("mm, THP, swap: delay splitting THP after swapped out"), THP can be swapped out in a whole. But, nr_reclaimed and some other vm counters still get inc'ed by one even though a whole THP (512 pages) gets swapped out. This doesn't make too much sense to memory reclaim. For example, direct reclaim may just need reclaim SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX pages, reclaiming one THP could fulfill it. But, if nr_reclaimed is not increased correctly, direct reclaim may just waste time to reclaim more pages, SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX * 512 pages in worst case. And, it may cause pgsteal_{kswapd|direct} is greater than pgscan_{kswapd|direct}, like the below: pgsteal_kswapd 122933 pgsteal_direct 26600225 pgscan_kswapd 174153 pgscan_direct 14678312 nr_reclaimed and nr_scanned must be fixed in parallel otherwise it would break some page reclaim logic, e.g. vmpressure: this looks at the scanned/reclaimed ratio so it won't change semantics as long as scanned & reclaimed are fixed in parallel. compaction/reclaim: compaction wants a certain number of physical pages freed up before going back to compacting. kswapd priority raising: kswapd raises priority if we scan fewer pages than the reclaim target (which itself is obviously expressed in order-0 pages). As a result, kswapd can falsely raise its aggressiveness even when it's making great progress. Other than nr_scanned and nr_reclaimed, some other counters, e.g. pgactivate, nr_skipped, nr_ref_keep and nr_unmap_fail need to be fixed too since they are user visible via cgroup, /proc/vmstat or trace points, otherwise they would be underreported. When isolating pages from LRUs, nr_taken has been accounted in base page, but nr_scanned and nr_skipped are still accounted in THP. It doesn't make too much sense too since this may cause trace point underreport the numbers as well. So accounting those counters in base page instead of accounting THP as one page. nr_dirty, nr_unqueued_dirty, nr_congested and nr_writeback are used by file cache, so they are not impacted by THP swap. This change may result in lower steal/scan ratio in some cases since THP may get split during page reclaim, then a part of tail pages get reclaimed instead of the whole 512 pages, but nr_scanned is accounted by 512, particularly for direct reclaim. But, this should be not a significant issue. Cc: "Huang, Ying" Cc: Johannes Weiner Cc: Michal Hocko Cc: Mel Gorman Cc: "Kirill A . Shutemov" Cc: Hugh Dickins Cc: Shakeel Butt Signed-off-by: Yang Shi --- v5: Fixed sc->nr_scanned double accounting per Huang Ying Added some comments to address the concern about premature OOM per Hillf Danton v4: Fixed the comments from Johannes and Huang Ying v3: Removed Shakeel's Reviewed-by since the patch has been changed significantly Switched back to use compound_order per Matthew Fixed more counters per Johannes v2: Added Shakeel's Reviewed-by Use hpage_nr_pages instead of compound_order per Huang Ying and William Kucharski mm/vmscan.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------- 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c index b65bc50..f4f4d57 100644 --- a/mm/vmscan.c +++ b/mm/vmscan.c @@ -1118,6 +1118,7 @@ static unsigned long shrink_page_list(struct list_head *page_list, int may_enter_fs; enum page_references references = PAGEREF_RECLAIM_CLEAN; bool dirty, writeback; + unsigned int nr_pages; cond_resched(); @@ -1129,6 +1130,13 @@ static unsigned long shrink_page_list(struct list_head *page_list, VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PageActive(page), page); + nr_pages = 1 << compound_order(page); + + /* + * Accounted one page for THP for now. If THP gets swapped + * out in a whole, will account all tail pages later to + * avoid accounting tail pages twice. + */ sc->nr_scanned++; if (unlikely(!page_evictable(page))) @@ -1250,7 +1258,7 @@ static unsigned long shrink_page_list(struct list_head *page_list, case PAGEREF_ACTIVATE: goto activate_locked; case PAGEREF_KEEP: - stat->nr_ref_keep++; + stat->nr_ref_keep += nr_pages; goto keep_locked; case PAGEREF_RECLAIM: case PAGEREF_RECLAIM_CLEAN: @@ -1292,7 +1300,9 @@ static unsigned long shrink_page_list(struct list_head *page_list, #endif if (!add_to_swap(page)) goto activate_locked; - } + } else + /* Account tail pages for THP */ + sc->nr_scanned += nr_pages - 1; may_enter_fs = 1; @@ -1315,7 +1325,7 @@ static unsigned long shrink_page_list(struct list_head *page_list, if (unlikely(PageTransHuge(page))) flags |= TTU_SPLIT_HUGE_PMD; if (!try_to_unmap(page, flags)) { - stat->nr_unmap_fail++; + stat->nr_unmap_fail += nr_pages; goto activate_locked; } } @@ -1442,7 +1452,11 @@ static unsigned long shrink_page_list(struct list_head *page_list, unlock_page(page); free_it: - nr_reclaimed++; + /* + * THP may get swapped out in a whole, need account + * all base pages. + */ + nr_reclaimed += (1 << compound_order(page)); /* * Is there need to periodically free_page_list? It would @@ -1464,7 +1478,6 @@ static unsigned long shrink_page_list(struct list_head *page_list, if (!PageMlocked(page)) { int type = page_is_file_cache(page); SetPageActive(page); - pgactivate++; stat->nr_activate[type] += hpage_nr_pages(page); count_memcg_page_event(page, PGACTIVATE); } @@ -1475,6 +1488,8 @@ static unsigned long shrink_page_list(struct list_head *page_list, VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PageLRU(page) || PageUnevictable(page), page); } + pgactivate = stat->nr_activate[0] + stat->nr_activate[1]; + mem_cgroup_uncharge_list(&free_pages); try_to_unmap_flush(); free_unref_page_list(&free_pages); @@ -1646,10 +1661,9 @@ static unsigned long isolate_lru_pages(unsigned long nr_to_scan, LIST_HEAD(pages_skipped); isolate_mode_t mode = (sc->may_unmap ? 0 : ISOLATE_UNMAPPED); + total_scan = 0; scan = 0; - for (total_scan = 0; - scan < nr_to_scan && nr_taken < nr_to_scan && !list_empty(src); - total_scan++) { + while (scan < nr_to_scan && !list_empty(src)) { struct page *page; page = lru_to_page(src); @@ -1657,9 +1671,12 @@ static unsigned long isolate_lru_pages(unsigned long nr_to_scan, VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!PageLRU(page), page); + nr_pages = 1 << compound_order(page); + total_scan += nr_pages; + if (page_zonenum(page) > sc->reclaim_idx) { list_move(&page->lru, &pages_skipped); - nr_skipped[page_zonenum(page)]++; + nr_skipped[page_zonenum(page)] += nr_pages; continue; } @@ -1668,11 +1685,14 @@ static unsigned long isolate_lru_pages(unsigned long nr_to_scan, * return with no isolated pages if the LRU mostly contains * ineligible pages. This causes the VM to not reclaim any * pages, triggering a premature OOM. + * + * Account all tail pages of THP. This would not cause + * premature OOM since __isolate_lru_page() returns -EBUSY + * only when the page is being freed somewhere else. */ - scan++; + scan += nr_pages; switch (__isolate_lru_page(page, mode)) { case 0: - nr_pages = hpage_nr_pages(page); nr_taken += nr_pages; nr_zone_taken[page_zonenum(page)] += nr_pages; list_move(&page->lru, dst);