From patchwork Tue Nov 19 12:23:18 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Alex Shi X-Patchwork-Id: 11251851 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3875138C for ; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 12:24:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E4122186D for ; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 12:24:29 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 6E4122186D Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.alibaba.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 7EA076B026B; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 07:24:23 -0500 (EST) Delivered-To: linux-mm-outgoing@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 74D316B026C; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 07:24:23 -0500 (EST) X-Original-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 5C40B6B026D; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 07:24:23 -0500 (EST) X-Original-To: linux-mm@kvack.org X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0091.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.91]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4864F6B026B for ; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 07:24:23 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin01.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay01.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 10622180AD807 for ; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 12:24:23 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 76172944806.01.judge38_261a9a3dabb5c X-Spam-Summary: 2,0,0,66b83fe397928325,d41d8cd98f00b204,alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com,:cgroups@vger.kernel.org:linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org::akpm@linux-foundation.org:mgorman@techsingularity.net:tj@kernel.org:hughd@google.com:khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru:daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com:yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com:willy@infradead.org:shakeelb@google.com:hannes@cmpxchg.org:alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com:mhocko@kernel.org:vdavydov.dev@gmail.com:guro@fb.com:chris@chrisdown.name:tglx@linutronix.de:vbabka@suse.cz:aryabinin@virtuozzo.com:swkhack@gmail.com:stefan.potyra@elektrobit.com:jgg@ziepe.ca:mchehab+samsung@kernel.org:peng.fan@nxp.com:nborisov@suse.com:ira.weiny@intel.com:ktkhai@virtuozzo.com:laoar.shao@gmail.com,RULES_HIT:2:41:355:379:541:800:960:973:981:988:989:1260:1261:1345:1359:1431:1437:1535:1605:1606:1730:1747:1777:1792:2198:2199:2393:2553:2559:2562:2898:3138:3139:3140:3141:3142:3167:3865:3866:3867:3868:3870:3871:3874:4118:4250:4321:4605:5007:6119:6261:6737:6742:7514:7903:8957:9207:1000 4:11026: X-HE-Tag: judge38_261a9a3dabb5c X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 7224 Received: from out30-44.freemail.mail.aliyun.com (out30-44.freemail.mail.aliyun.com [115.124.30.44]) by imf32.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 12:24:21 +0000 (UTC) X-Alimail-AntiSpam: AC=PASS;BC=-1|-1;BR=01201311R191e4;CH=green;DM=||false|;FP=0|-1|-1|-1|0|-1|-1|-1;HT=e01f04446;MF=alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com;NM=1;PH=DS;RN=30;SR=0;TI=SMTPD_---0TiZ35.N_1574166246; Received: from localhost(mailfrom:alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com fp:SMTPD_---0TiZ35.N_1574166246) by smtp.aliyun-inc.com(127.0.0.1); Tue, 19 Nov 2019 20:24:06 +0800 From: Alex Shi To: cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, mgorman@techsingularity.net, tj@kernel.org, hughd@google.com, khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru, daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com, yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com, willy@infradead.org, shakeelb@google.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org Cc: Alex Shi , Michal Hocko , Vladimir Davydov , Roman Gushchin , Chris Down , Thomas Gleixner , Vlastimil Babka , Andrey Ryabinin , swkhack , "Potyra, Stefan" , Jason Gunthorpe , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Peng Fan , Nikolay Borisov , Ira Weiny , Kirill Tkhai , Yafang Shao Subject: [PATCH v4 4/9] mm/mlock: only change the lru_lock iff page's lruvec is different Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 20:23:18 +0800 Message-Id: <1574166203-151975-5-git-send-email-alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.8.3.1 In-Reply-To: <1574166203-151975-1-git-send-email-alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com> References: <1574166203-151975-1-git-send-email-alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com> X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: During the pagevec locking, a new page's lruvec is may same as previous one. Thus we could save a re-locking, and only change lock iff lruvec is new. Function named relock_page_lruvec following Hugh Dickins patch. The first version of this patch used rcu_read_lock to guard lruvec assign and comparsion with locked_lruvev in relock_page_lruvec. But Rong Chen report a regression with PROVE_LOCKING config. The rcu_read locking causes qspinlock waiting to be locked for too long. Since we had hold a spinlock, rcu_read locking isn't necessary. [lkp@intel.com: Fix RCU-related regression reported by LKP robot] Signed-off-by: Alex Shi Cc: Johannes Weiner Cc: Michal Hocko Cc: Vladimir Davydov Cc: Andrew Morton Cc: Roman Gushchin Cc: Shakeel Butt Cc: Chris Down Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Vlastimil Babka Cc: Andrey Ryabinin Cc: swkhack Cc: "Potyra, Stefan" Cc: Jason Gunthorpe Cc: Matthew Wilcox Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab Cc: Peng Fan Cc: Nikolay Borisov Cc: Ira Weiny Cc: Kirill Tkhai Cc: Yang Shi Cc: Yafang Shao Cc: Mel Gorman Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov Cc: Hugh Dickins Cc: Tejun Heo Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: cgroups@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org --- include/linux/memcontrol.h | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ mm/mlock.c | 16 +++++++++------- 2 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/memcontrol.h b/include/linux/memcontrol.h index 9538253998a6..19ff453e2822 100644 --- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h +++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h @@ -1291,6 +1291,50 @@ static inline void dec_lruvec_page_state(struct page *page, mod_lruvec_page_state(page, idx, -1); } +/* Don't lock again iff page's lruvec locked */ +static inline struct lruvec *relock_page_lruvec_irq(struct page *page, + struct lruvec *locked_lruvec) +{ + struct pglist_data *pgdat = page_pgdat(page); + struct lruvec *lruvec; + + if (!locked_lruvec) + goto lock; + + lruvec = mem_cgroup_page_lruvec(page, pgdat); + + if (locked_lruvec == lruvec) + return lruvec; + + spin_unlock_irq(&locked_lruvec->lru_lock); + +lock: + lruvec = lock_page_lruvec_irq(page, pgdat); + return lruvec; +} + +/* Don't lock again iff page's lruvec locked */ +static inline struct lruvec *relock_page_lruvec_irqsave(struct page *page, + struct lruvec *locked_lruvec, unsigned long *flags) +{ + struct pglist_data *pgdat = page_pgdat(page); + struct lruvec *lruvec; + + if (!locked_lruvec) + goto lock; + + lruvec = mem_cgroup_page_lruvec(page, pgdat); + + if (locked_lruvec == lruvec) + return lruvec; + + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&locked_lruvec->lru_lock, *flags); + +lock: + lruvec = lock_page_lruvec_irqsave(page, pgdat, flags); + return lruvec; +} + #ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_WRITEBACK struct wb_domain *mem_cgroup_wb_domain(struct bdi_writeback *wb); diff --git a/mm/mlock.c b/mm/mlock.c index b509b80b8513..8b3a97b62c0a 100644 --- a/mm/mlock.c +++ b/mm/mlock.c @@ -290,6 +290,7 @@ static void __munlock_pagevec(struct pagevec *pvec, struct zone *zone) { int i; int nr = pagevec_count(pvec); + int delta_munlocked = -nr; struct pagevec pvec_putback; struct lruvec *lruvec = NULL; int pgrescued = 0; @@ -300,20 +301,19 @@ static void __munlock_pagevec(struct pagevec *pvec, struct zone *zone) for (i = 0; i < nr; i++) { struct page *page = pvec->pages[i]; - lruvec = lock_page_lruvec_irq(page, page_pgdat(page)); + lruvec = relock_page_lruvec_irq(page, lruvec); if (TestClearPageMlocked(page)) { /* * We already have pin from follow_page_mask() * so we can spare the get_page() here. */ - if (__munlock_isolate_lru_page(page, lruvec, false)) { - __mod_zone_page_state(zone, NR_MLOCK, -1); - spin_unlock_irq(&lruvec->lru_lock); + if (__munlock_isolate_lru_page(page, lruvec, false)) continue; - } else + else __munlock_isolation_failed(page); - } + } else + delta_munlocked++; /* * We won't be munlocking this page in the next phase @@ -323,8 +323,10 @@ static void __munlock_pagevec(struct pagevec *pvec, struct zone *zone) */ pagevec_add(&pvec_putback, pvec->pages[i]); pvec->pages[i] = NULL; - spin_unlock_irq(&lruvec->lru_lock); } + __mod_zone_page_state(zone, NR_MLOCK, delta_munlocked); + if (lruvec) + spin_unlock_irq(&lruvec->lru_lock); /* Now we can release pins of pages that we are not munlocking */ pagevec_release(&pvec_putback);