| Message ID | 1578283835-21969-1-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | mm/memblock: Define memblock_physmem_add() | expand |
On Mon, Jan 06, 2020 at 09:40:35AM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote: > On s390 platform memblock.physmem array is being built by directly calling > into memblock_add_range() which is a low level function not intended to be > used outside of memblock. Hence lets conditionally add helper functions for > physmem array when HAVE_MEMBLOCK_PHYS_MAP is enabled. Also use MAX_NUMNODES > instead of 0 as node ID similar to memblock_add() and memblock_reserve(). > Make memblock_add_range() a static function as it is no longer getting used > outside of memblock. > > Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> > Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com> > Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> > Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> > Cc: Collin Walling <walling@linux.ibm.com> > Cc: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@de.ibm.com> > Cc: Philipp Rudo <prudo@linux.ibm.com> > Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com> > Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> > Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com> > --- > Only build tested for s390, will appreciate if some one can give it a try > on a real system. > > Changes from RFC: > > - Dropped all memblock_dbg() changes per Mike > - Renamed memblock_physmem() as memblock_physmem_add() per Mike > - Made memblock_add_range() a static function per Mike > - Updated the commit message > > RFC: (https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11316627/) > > arch/s390/kernel/setup.c | 12 +++--------- > include/linux/memblock.h | 7 +++---- > mm/memblock.c | 14 +++++++++++++- > 3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/setup.c b/arch/s390/kernel/setup.c > index b9104ae162f4..424cb8fd2c35 100644 > --- a/arch/s390/kernel/setup.c > +++ b/arch/s390/kernel/setup.c > @@ -762,14 +762,6 @@ static void __init free_mem_detect_info(void) > memblock_free(start, size); > } > > -static void __init memblock_physmem_add(phys_addr_t start, phys_addr_t size) > -{ > - memblock_dbg("memblock_physmem_add: [%#016llx-%#016llx]\n", > - start, start + size - 1); > - memblock_add_range(&memblock.memory, start, size, 0, 0); > - memblock_add_range(&memblock.physmem, start, size, 0, 0); > -} > - > static const char * __init get_mem_info_source(void) > { > switch (mem_detect.info_source) { > @@ -794,8 +786,10 @@ static void __init memblock_add_mem_detect_info(void) > get_mem_info_source(), mem_detect.info_source); > /* keep memblock lists close to the kernel */ > memblock_set_bottom_up(true); > - for_each_mem_detect_block(i, &start, &end) > + for_each_mem_detect_block(i, &start, &end) { > + memblock_add(start, end - start); > memblock_physmem_add(start, end - start); > + } > memblock_set_bottom_up(false); > memblock_dump_all(); > } > diff --git a/include/linux/memblock.h b/include/linux/memblock.h > index b38bbefabfab..079d17d96410 100644 > --- a/include/linux/memblock.h > +++ b/include/linux/memblock.h > @@ -113,6 +113,9 @@ int memblock_add(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size); > int memblock_remove(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size); > int memblock_free(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size); > int memblock_reserve(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size); > +#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK_PHYS_MAP > +int memblock_physmem_add(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size); > +#endif > void memblock_trim_memory(phys_addr_t align); > bool memblock_overlaps_region(struct memblock_type *type, > phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size); > @@ -127,10 +130,6 @@ void reset_node_managed_pages(pg_data_t *pgdat); > void reset_all_zones_managed_pages(void); > > /* Low level functions */ > -int memblock_add_range(struct memblock_type *type, > - phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size, > - int nid, enum memblock_flags flags); > - > void __next_mem_range(u64 *idx, int nid, enum memblock_flags flags, > struct memblock_type *type_a, > struct memblock_type *type_b, phys_addr_t *out_start, > diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c > index 4bc2c7d8bf42..fc0d4db1d646 100644 > --- a/mm/memblock.c > +++ b/mm/memblock.c > @@ -575,7 +575,7 @@ static void __init_memblock memblock_insert_region(struct memblock_type *type, > * Return: > * 0 on success, -errno on failure. > */ > -int __init_memblock memblock_add_range(struct memblock_type *type, > +static int __init_memblock memblock_add_range(struct memblock_type *type, > phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size, > int nid, enum memblock_flags flags) > { > @@ -830,6 +830,18 @@ int __init_memblock memblock_reserve(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size) > return memblock_add_range(&memblock.reserved, base, size, MAX_NUMNODES, 0); > } > > +#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK_PHYS_MAP > +int __init_memblock memblock_physmem_add(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size) > +{ > + phys_addr_t end = base + size - 1; > + > + memblock_dbg("%s: [%pa-%pa] %pS\n", __func__, > + &base, &end, (void *)_RET_IP_); > + > + return memblock_add_range(&memblock.physmem, base, size, MAX_NUMNODES, 0); > +} > +#endif > + > /** > * memblock_setclr_flag - set or clear flag for a memory region > * @base: base address of the region > -- > 2.20.1 >
On Mon, Jan 06, 2020 at 09:40:35AM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote: > On s390 platform memblock.physmem array is being built by directly calling > into memblock_add_range() which is a low level function not intended to be > used outside of memblock. Hence lets conditionally add helper functions for > physmem array when HAVE_MEMBLOCK_PHYS_MAP is enabled. Also use MAX_NUMNODES > instead of 0 as node ID similar to memblock_add() and memblock_reserve(). > Make memblock_add_range() a static function as it is no longer getting used > outside of memblock. > > Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> > Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com> > Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> > Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> > Cc: Collin Walling <walling@linux.ibm.com> > Cc: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@de.ibm.com> > Cc: Philipp Rudo <prudo@linux.ibm.com> > Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com> > Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> > Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> > --- > Only build tested for s390, will appreciate if some one can give it a try > on a real system. Acked-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/setup.c b/arch/s390/kernel/setup.c index b9104ae162f4..424cb8fd2c35 100644 --- a/arch/s390/kernel/setup.c +++ b/arch/s390/kernel/setup.c @@ -762,14 +762,6 @@ static void __init free_mem_detect_info(void) memblock_free(start, size); } -static void __init memblock_physmem_add(phys_addr_t start, phys_addr_t size) -{ - memblock_dbg("memblock_physmem_add: [%#016llx-%#016llx]\n", - start, start + size - 1); - memblock_add_range(&memblock.memory, start, size, 0, 0); - memblock_add_range(&memblock.physmem, start, size, 0, 0); -} - static const char * __init get_mem_info_source(void) { switch (mem_detect.info_source) { @@ -794,8 +786,10 @@ static void __init memblock_add_mem_detect_info(void) get_mem_info_source(), mem_detect.info_source); /* keep memblock lists close to the kernel */ memblock_set_bottom_up(true); - for_each_mem_detect_block(i, &start, &end) + for_each_mem_detect_block(i, &start, &end) { + memblock_add(start, end - start); memblock_physmem_add(start, end - start); + } memblock_set_bottom_up(false); memblock_dump_all(); } diff --git a/include/linux/memblock.h b/include/linux/memblock.h index b38bbefabfab..079d17d96410 100644 --- a/include/linux/memblock.h +++ b/include/linux/memblock.h @@ -113,6 +113,9 @@ int memblock_add(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size); int memblock_remove(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size); int memblock_free(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size); int memblock_reserve(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size); +#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK_PHYS_MAP +int memblock_physmem_add(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size); +#endif void memblock_trim_memory(phys_addr_t align); bool memblock_overlaps_region(struct memblock_type *type, phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size); @@ -127,10 +130,6 @@ void reset_node_managed_pages(pg_data_t *pgdat); void reset_all_zones_managed_pages(void); /* Low level functions */ -int memblock_add_range(struct memblock_type *type, - phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size, - int nid, enum memblock_flags flags); - void __next_mem_range(u64 *idx, int nid, enum memblock_flags flags, struct memblock_type *type_a, struct memblock_type *type_b, phys_addr_t *out_start, diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c index 4bc2c7d8bf42..fc0d4db1d646 100644 --- a/mm/memblock.c +++ b/mm/memblock.c @@ -575,7 +575,7 @@ static void __init_memblock memblock_insert_region(struct memblock_type *type, * Return: * 0 on success, -errno on failure. */ -int __init_memblock memblock_add_range(struct memblock_type *type, +static int __init_memblock memblock_add_range(struct memblock_type *type, phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size, int nid, enum memblock_flags flags) { @@ -830,6 +830,18 @@ int __init_memblock memblock_reserve(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size) return memblock_add_range(&memblock.reserved, base, size, MAX_NUMNODES, 0); } +#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK_PHYS_MAP +int __init_memblock memblock_physmem_add(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size) +{ + phys_addr_t end = base + size - 1; + + memblock_dbg("%s: [%pa-%pa] %pS\n", __func__, + &base, &end, (void *)_RET_IP_); + + return memblock_add_range(&memblock.physmem, base, size, MAX_NUMNODES, 0); +} +#endif + /** * memblock_setclr_flag - set or clear flag for a memory region * @base: base address of the region
On s390 platform memblock.physmem array is being built by directly calling into memblock_add_range() which is a low level function not intended to be used outside of memblock. Hence lets conditionally add helper functions for physmem array when HAVE_MEMBLOCK_PHYS_MAP is enabled. Also use MAX_NUMNODES instead of 0 as node ID similar to memblock_add() and memblock_reserve(). Make memblock_add_range() a static function as it is no longer getting used outside of memblock. Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> Cc: Collin Walling <walling@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@de.ibm.com> Cc: Philipp Rudo <prudo@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> --- Only build tested for s390, will appreciate if some one can give it a try on a real system. Changes from RFC: - Dropped all memblock_dbg() changes per Mike - Renamed memblock_physmem() as memblock_physmem_add() per Mike - Made memblock_add_range() a static function per Mike - Updated the commit message RFC: (https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11316627/) arch/s390/kernel/setup.c | 12 +++--------- include/linux/memblock.h | 7 +++---- mm/memblock.c | 14 +++++++++++++- 3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)