| Message ID | 1587061357-122619-1-git-send-email-yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | mm: shmem: disable interrupt when acquiring info->lock in userfaultfd_copy path | expand |
diff --git a/mm/shmem.c b/mm/shmem.c index d722eb8..762da6a 100644 --- a/mm/shmem.c +++ b/mm/shmem.c @@ -2399,11 +2399,11 @@ static int shmem_mfill_atomic_pte(struct mm_struct *dst_mm, lru_cache_add_anon(page); - spin_lock(&info->lock); + spin_lock_irq(&info->lock); info->alloced++; inode->i_blocks += BLOCKS_PER_PAGE; shmem_recalc_inode(inode); - spin_unlock(&info->lock); + spin_unlock_irq(&info->lock); inc_mm_counter(dst_mm, mm_counter_file(page)); page_add_file_rmap(page, false);
Syzbot reported the below lockdep splat: WARNING: possible irq lock inversion dependency detected 5.6.0-rc7-syzkaller #0 Not tainted -------------------------------------------------------- syz-executor.0/10317 just changed the state of lock: ffff888021d16568 (&(&info->lock)->rlock){+.+.}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:338 [inline] ffff888021d16568 (&(&info->lock)->rlock){+.+.}, at: shmem_mfill_atomic_pte+0x1012/0x21c0 mm/shmem.c:2407 but this lock was taken by another, SOFTIRQ-safe lock in the past: (&(&xa->xa_lock)->rlock#5){..-.} and interrupts could create inverse lock ordering between them. other info that might help us debug this: Possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&(&info->lock)->rlock); local_irq_disable(); lock(&(&xa->xa_lock)->rlock#5); lock(&(&info->lock)->rlock); <Interrupt> lock(&(&xa->xa_lock)->rlock#5); *** DEADLOCK *** The full report is quite lengthy, please see: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/alpine.LSU.2.11.2004152007370.13597@eggly.anvils/T/#m813b412c5f78e25ca8c6c7734886ed4de43f241d It is because CPU 0 held info->lock with IRQ enabled in userfaultfd_copy path, then CPU 1 is splitting a THP which held xa_lock and info->lock in IRQ disabled context at the same time. If softirq comes in to acquire xa_lock, the deadlock would be triggered. The fix is to acquire/release info->lock with *_irq version instead of plain spin_{lock,unlock} to make it softirq safe. Fixes: 4c27fe4c4c84 ("userfaultfd: shmem: add shmem_mcopy_atomic_pte for userfaultfd support") Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+e27980339d305f2dbfd9@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Yang Shi <yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com> --- mm/shmem.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)