Message ID | 1621499404-67756-3-git-send-email-feng.tang@intel.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | mm/mempolicy: some fix and semantics cleanup | expand |
On Thu, 20 May 2021, Feng Tang wrote: > Currently the kernel_mbind() and kernel_set_mempolicy() do almost > the same operation for parameter sanity check and preprocessing. > > Add a macro to unify the code to reduce the redundancy, and make > it easier for changing the pre-processing code in future. > > Signed-off-by: Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com> > --- > mm/mempolicy.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++--------------------------- > 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/mm/mempolicy.c b/mm/mempolicy.c > index 1964cca..0f5bf60 100644 > --- a/mm/mempolicy.c > +++ b/mm/mempolicy.c > @@ -1460,25 +1460,29 @@ static int copy_nodes_to_user(unsigned long __user *mask, unsigned long maxnode, > return copy_to_user(mask, nodes_addr(*nodes), copy) ? -EFAULT : 0; > } > > +#define MPOL_PRE_PROCESS() \ This should be extracted to helper function returning bool, not a macro. > + \ > + nodemask_t nodes; \ > + int err; \ > + unsigned short mode_flags; \ > + mode_flags = mode & MPOL_MODE_FLAGS; \ > + mode &= ~MPOL_MODE_FLAGS; \ > + if (mode >= MPOL_MAX) \ > + return -EINVAL; \ > + if ((mode_flags & MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES) && \ > + (mode_flags & MPOL_F_RELATIVE_NODES)) \ > + return -EINVAL; \ > + err = get_nodes(&nodes, nmask, maxnode); \ > + if (err) \ > + return err; > + > static long kernel_mbind(unsigned long start, unsigned long len, > unsigned long mode, const unsigned long __user *nmask, > unsigned long maxnode, unsigned int flags) > { > - nodemask_t nodes; > - int err; > - unsigned short mode_flags; > + MPOL_PRE_PROCESS(); > > start = untagged_addr(start); > - mode_flags = mode & MPOL_MODE_FLAGS; > - mode &= ~MPOL_MODE_FLAGS; > - if (mode >= MPOL_MAX) > - return -EINVAL; > - if ((mode_flags & MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES) && > - (mode_flags & MPOL_F_RELATIVE_NODES)) > - return -EINVAL; > - err = get_nodes(&nodes, nmask, maxnode); > - if (err) > - return err; > return do_mbind(start, len, mode, mode_flags, &nodes, flags); > } > > @@ -1493,20 +1497,8 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE6(mbind, unsigned long, start, unsigned long, len, > static long kernel_set_mempolicy(int mode, const unsigned long __user *nmask, > unsigned long maxnode) > { > - int err; > - nodemask_t nodes; > - unsigned short flags; > - > - flags = mode & MPOL_MODE_FLAGS; > - mode &= ~MPOL_MODE_FLAGS; > - if ((unsigned int)mode >= MPOL_MAX) > - return -EINVAL; > - if ((flags & MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES) && (flags & MPOL_F_RELATIVE_NODES)) > - return -EINVAL; > - err = get_nodes(&nodes, nmask, maxnode); > - if (err) > - return err; > - return do_set_mempolicy(mode, flags, &nodes); > + MPOL_PRE_PROCESS(); > + return do_set_mempolicy(mode, mode_flags, &nodes); > } > > SYSCALL_DEFINE3(set_mempolicy, int, mode, const unsigned long __user *, nmask, > -- > 2.7.4 > >
On Sun, May 23, 2021 at 10:16:11PM -0700, David Rientjes wrote: > On Thu, 20 May 2021, Feng Tang wrote: > > > Currently the kernel_mbind() and kernel_set_mempolicy() do almost > > the same operation for parameter sanity check and preprocessing. > > > > Add a macro to unify the code to reduce the redundancy, and make > > it easier for changing the pre-processing code in future. > > > > Signed-off-by: Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com> > > --- > > mm/mempolicy.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++--------------------------- > > 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/mm/mempolicy.c b/mm/mempolicy.c > > index 1964cca..0f5bf60 100644 > > --- a/mm/mempolicy.c > > +++ b/mm/mempolicy.c > > @@ -1460,25 +1460,29 @@ static int copy_nodes_to_user(unsigned long __user *mask, unsigned long maxnode, > > return copy_to_user(mask, nodes_addr(*nodes), copy) ? -EFAULT : 0; > > } > > > > +#define MPOL_PRE_PROCESS() \ > > This should be extracted to helper function returning bool, not a macro. Yes, initially I did try it with an inline function, but as a function it has quite several input parameters and several output parameters, which made the code still big and ugly. But if community think it's the right direction to go, I can change it. Thanks, Feng > > + \ > > + nodemask_t nodes; \ > > + int err; \ > > + unsigned short mode_flags; \ > > + mode_flags = mode & MPOL_MODE_FLAGS; \ > > + mode &= ~MPOL_MODE_FLAGS; \ > > + if (mode >= MPOL_MAX) \ > > + return -EINVAL; \ > > + if ((mode_flags & MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES) && \ > > + (mode_flags & MPOL_F_RELATIVE_NODES)) \ > > + return -EINVAL; \ > > + err = get_nodes(&nodes, nmask, maxnode); \ > > + if (err) \ > > + return err; > > + > > static long kernel_mbind(unsigned long start, unsigned long len, > > unsigned long mode, const unsigned long __user *nmask, > > unsigned long maxnode, unsigned int flags) > > { > > - nodemask_t nodes; > > - int err; > > - unsigned short mode_flags; > > + MPOL_PRE_PROCESS(); > > > > start = untagged_addr(start); > > - mode_flags = mode & MPOL_MODE_FLAGS; > > - mode &= ~MPOL_MODE_FLAGS; > > - if (mode >= MPOL_MAX) > > - return -EINVAL; > > - if ((mode_flags & MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES) && > > - (mode_flags & MPOL_F_RELATIVE_NODES)) > > - return -EINVAL; > > - err = get_nodes(&nodes, nmask, maxnode); > > - if (err) > > - return err; > > return do_mbind(start, len, mode, mode_flags, &nodes, flags); > > } > > > > @@ -1493,20 +1497,8 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE6(mbind, unsigned long, start, unsigned long, len, > > static long kernel_set_mempolicy(int mode, const unsigned long __user *nmask, > > unsigned long maxnode) > > { > > - int err; > > - nodemask_t nodes; > > - unsigned short flags; > > - > > - flags = mode & MPOL_MODE_FLAGS; > > - mode &= ~MPOL_MODE_FLAGS; > > - if ((unsigned int)mode >= MPOL_MAX) > > - return -EINVAL; > > - if ((flags & MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES) && (flags & MPOL_F_RELATIVE_NODES)) > > - return -EINVAL; > > - err = get_nodes(&nodes, nmask, maxnode); > > - if (err) > > - return err; > > - return do_set_mempolicy(mode, flags, &nodes); > > + MPOL_PRE_PROCESS(); > > + return do_set_mempolicy(mode, mode_flags, &nodes); > > } > > > > SYSCALL_DEFINE3(set_mempolicy, int, mode, const unsigned long __user *, nmask, > > -- > > 2.7.4 > > > >
On Mon, May 24, 2021 at 01:59:39PM +0800, Tang, Feng wrote: > On Sun, May 23, 2021 at 10:16:11PM -0700, David Rientjes wrote: > > On Thu, 20 May 2021, Feng Tang wrote: > > > > > Currently the kernel_mbind() and kernel_set_mempolicy() do almost > > > the same operation for parameter sanity check and preprocessing. > > > > > > Add a macro to unify the code to reduce the redundancy, and make > > > it easier for changing the pre-processing code in future. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com> > > > --- > > > mm/mempolicy.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++--------------------------- > > > 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/mm/mempolicy.c b/mm/mempolicy.c > > > index 1964cca..0f5bf60 100644 > > > --- a/mm/mempolicy.c > > > +++ b/mm/mempolicy.c > > > @@ -1460,25 +1460,29 @@ static int copy_nodes_to_user(unsigned long __user *mask, unsigned long maxnode, > > > return copy_to_user(mask, nodes_addr(*nodes), copy) ? -EFAULT : 0; > > > } > > > > > > +#define MPOL_PRE_PROCESS() \ > > > > This should be extracted to helper function returning bool, not a macro. > > Yes, initially I did try it with an inline function, but as a function > it has quite several input parameters and several output parameters, > which made the code still big and ugly. > > But if community think it's the right direction to go, I can change it. Following is a patch to unify the preprocssing by using a helper function, please review, thanks - Feng --- diff --git a/mm/mempolicy.c b/mm/mempolicy.c index d79fa299b70c..8e4f47f925b6 100644 --- a/mm/mempolicy.c +++ b/mm/mempolicy.c @@ -1460,6 +1460,20 @@ static int copy_nodes_to_user(unsigned long __user *mask, unsigned long maxnode, return copy_to_user(mask, nodes_addr(*nodes), copy) ? -EFAULT : 0; } +static inline int mpol_pre_process(int *mode, const unsigned long __user *nmask, unsigned long maxnode, nodemask_t *nodes, unsigned short *flags) +{ + int ret; + + *flags = *mode & MPOL_MODE_FLAGS; + *mode &= ~MPOL_MODE_FLAGS; + if ((unsigned int)(*mode) >= MPOL_MAX) + return -EINVAL; + if ((*flags & MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES) && (*flags & MPOL_F_RELATIVE_NODES)) + return -EINVAL; + ret = get_nodes(nodes, nmask, maxnode); + return ret; +} + static long kernel_mbind(unsigned long start, unsigned long len, unsigned long mode, const unsigned long __user *nmask, unsigned long maxnode, unsigned int flags) @@ -1467,19 +1481,14 @@ static long kernel_mbind(unsigned long start, unsigned long len, nodemask_t nodes; int err; unsigned short mode_flags; + int lmode = mode; - start = untagged_addr(start); - mode_flags = mode & MPOL_MODE_FLAGS; - mode &= ~MPOL_MODE_FLAGS; - if (mode >= MPOL_MAX) - return -EINVAL; - if ((mode_flags & MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES) && - (mode_flags & MPOL_F_RELATIVE_NODES)) - return -EINVAL; - err = get_nodes(&nodes, nmask, maxnode); + err = mpol_pre_process(&lmode, nmask, maxnode, &nodes, &mode_flags); if (err) return err; - return do_mbind(start, len, mode, mode_flags, &nodes, flags); + + start = untagged_addr(start); + return do_mbind(start, len, lmode, mode_flags, &nodes, flags); } SYSCALL_DEFINE6(mbind, unsigned long, start, unsigned long, len, @@ -1495,18 +1504,14 @@ static long kernel_set_mempolicy(int mode, const unsigned long __user *nmask, { int err; nodemask_t nodes; - unsigned short flags; + unsigned short mode_flags; + int lmode = mode; - flags = mode & MPOL_MODE_FLAGS; - mode &= ~MPOL_MODE_FLAGS; - if ((unsigned int)mode >= MPOL_MAX) - return -EINVAL; - if ((flags & MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES) && (flags & MPOL_F_RELATIVE_NODES)) - return -EINVAL; - err = get_nodes(&nodes, nmask, maxnode); + err = mpol_pre_process(&lmode, nmask, maxnode, &nodes, &mode_flags); if (err) return err; - return do_set_mempolicy(mode, flags, &nodes); + + return do_set_mempolicy(lmode, mode_flags, &nodes); } SYSCALL_DEFINE3(set_mempolicy, int, mode, const unsigned long __user *, nmask,
diff --git a/mm/mempolicy.c b/mm/mempolicy.c index 1964cca..0f5bf60 100644 --- a/mm/mempolicy.c +++ b/mm/mempolicy.c @@ -1460,25 +1460,29 @@ static int copy_nodes_to_user(unsigned long __user *mask, unsigned long maxnode, return copy_to_user(mask, nodes_addr(*nodes), copy) ? -EFAULT : 0; } +#define MPOL_PRE_PROCESS() \ + \ + nodemask_t nodes; \ + int err; \ + unsigned short mode_flags; \ + mode_flags = mode & MPOL_MODE_FLAGS; \ + mode &= ~MPOL_MODE_FLAGS; \ + if (mode >= MPOL_MAX) \ + return -EINVAL; \ + if ((mode_flags & MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES) && \ + (mode_flags & MPOL_F_RELATIVE_NODES)) \ + return -EINVAL; \ + err = get_nodes(&nodes, nmask, maxnode); \ + if (err) \ + return err; + static long kernel_mbind(unsigned long start, unsigned long len, unsigned long mode, const unsigned long __user *nmask, unsigned long maxnode, unsigned int flags) { - nodemask_t nodes; - int err; - unsigned short mode_flags; + MPOL_PRE_PROCESS(); start = untagged_addr(start); - mode_flags = mode & MPOL_MODE_FLAGS; - mode &= ~MPOL_MODE_FLAGS; - if (mode >= MPOL_MAX) - return -EINVAL; - if ((mode_flags & MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES) && - (mode_flags & MPOL_F_RELATIVE_NODES)) - return -EINVAL; - err = get_nodes(&nodes, nmask, maxnode); - if (err) - return err; return do_mbind(start, len, mode, mode_flags, &nodes, flags); } @@ -1493,20 +1497,8 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE6(mbind, unsigned long, start, unsigned long, len, static long kernel_set_mempolicy(int mode, const unsigned long __user *nmask, unsigned long maxnode) { - int err; - nodemask_t nodes; - unsigned short flags; - - flags = mode & MPOL_MODE_FLAGS; - mode &= ~MPOL_MODE_FLAGS; - if ((unsigned int)mode >= MPOL_MAX) - return -EINVAL; - if ((flags & MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES) && (flags & MPOL_F_RELATIVE_NODES)) - return -EINVAL; - err = get_nodes(&nodes, nmask, maxnode); - if (err) - return err; - return do_set_mempolicy(mode, flags, &nodes); + MPOL_PRE_PROCESS(); + return do_set_mempolicy(mode, mode_flags, &nodes); } SYSCALL_DEFINE3(set_mempolicy, int, mode, const unsigned long __user *, nmask,
Currently the kernel_mbind() and kernel_set_mempolicy() do almost the same operation for parameter sanity check and preprocessing. Add a macro to unify the code to reduce the redundancy, and make it easier for changing the pre-processing code in future. Signed-off-by: Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com> --- mm/mempolicy.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++--------------------------- 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)