From patchwork Mon Jul 12 08:09:30 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Feng Tang X-Patchwork-Id: 12370505 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89634C07E9C for ; Mon, 12 Jul 2021 08:09:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F68961183 for ; Mon, 12 Jul 2021 08:09:51 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 2F68961183 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 5755C6B008C; Mon, 12 Jul 2021 04:09:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 54B946B0092; Mon, 12 Jul 2021 04:09:51 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 413E36B0096; Mon, 12 Jul 2021 04:09:51 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0031.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.31]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 203DB6B008C for ; Mon, 12 Jul 2021 04:09:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin24.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay03.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D5818248047 for ; Mon, 12 Jul 2021 08:09:50 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 78353212140.24.E56530A Received: from mga18.intel.com (mga18.intel.com [134.134.136.126]) by imf29.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B644290001BD for ; Mon, 12 Jul 2021 08:09:49 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,10042"; a="197214094" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.84,232,1620716400"; d="scan'208";a="197214094" Received: from orsmga008.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.65]) by orsmga106.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 12 Jul 2021 01:09:48 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.84,232,1620716400"; d="scan'208";a="459109347" Received: from shbuild999.sh.intel.com ([10.239.146.151]) by orsmga008.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 12 Jul 2021 01:09:44 -0700 From: Feng Tang To: linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton , Michal Hocko , David Rientjes , Dave Hansen , Ben Widawsky Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, Andrea Arcangeli , Mel Gorman , Mike Kravetz , Randy Dunlap , Vlastimil Babka , Andi Kleen , Dan Williams , ying.huang@intel.com, Feng Tang Subject: [PATCH v6 2/6] mm/memplicy: add page allocation function for MPOL_PREFERRED_MANY policy Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2021 16:09:30 +0800 Message-Id: <1626077374-81682-3-git-send-email-feng.tang@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.7.4 In-Reply-To: <1626077374-81682-1-git-send-email-feng.tang@intel.com> References: <1626077374-81682-1-git-send-email-feng.tang@intel.com> Authentication-Results: imf29.hostedemail.com; dkim=none; dmarc=fail reason="No valid SPF, No valid DKIM" header.from=intel.com (policy=none); spf=none (imf29.hostedemail.com: domain of feng.tang@intel.com has no SPF policy when checking 134.134.136.126) smtp.mailfrom=feng.tang@intel.com X-Rspamd-Server: rspam03 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: B644290001BD X-Stat-Signature: m9fp66yy5gntrmw3p4yscdpai6uy4xsk X-HE-Tag: 1626077389-860999 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: The semantics of MPOL_PREFERRED_MANY is similar to MPOL_PREFERRED, that it will first try to allocate memory from the preferred node(s), and fallback to all nodes in system when first try fails. Add a dedicated function for it just like 'interleave' policy. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200630212517.308045-9-ben.widawsky@intel.com Suggested-by: Michal Hocko Co-developed-by: Ben Widawsky Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky Signed-off-by: Feng Tang --- mm/mempolicy.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+) diff --git a/mm/mempolicy.c b/mm/mempolicy.c index 17b5800b7dcc..d17bf018efcc 100644 --- a/mm/mempolicy.c +++ b/mm/mempolicy.c @@ -2153,6 +2153,25 @@ static struct page *alloc_page_interleave(gfp_t gfp, unsigned order, return page; } +static struct page *alloc_page_preferred_many(gfp_t gfp, unsigned int order, + struct mempolicy *pol) +{ + struct page *page; + + /* + * This is a two pass approach. The first pass will only try the + * preferred nodes but skip the direct reclaim and allow the + * allocation to fail, while the second pass will try all the + * nodes in system. + */ + page = __alloc_pages(((gfp | __GFP_NOWARN) & ~__GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM), + order, first_node(pol->nodes), &pol->nodes); + if (!page) + page = __alloc_pages(gfp, order, numa_node_id(), NULL); + + return page; +} + /** * alloc_pages_vma - Allocate a page for a VMA. * @gfp: GFP flags.