| Message ID | 20190527111152.16324-10-david@redhat.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | mm/memory_hotplug: Factor out memory block devicehandling | expand |
On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 01:11:50PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote: >Let's factor out removing of memory block devices, which is only >necessary for memory added via add_memory() and friends that created >memory block devices. Remove the devices before calling >arch_remove_memory(). > >This finishes factoring out memory block device handling from >arch_add_memory() and arch_remove_memory(). > >Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> >Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> >Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> >Cc: "mike.travis@hpe.com" <mike.travis@hpe.com> >Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> >Cc: Andrew Banman <andrew.banman@hpe.com> >Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> >Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> >Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> >Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> >Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> >Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> >Cc: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> >Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> >Cc: Pavel Tatashin <pavel.tatashin@microsoft.com> >Cc: Arun KS <arunks@codeaurora.org> >Cc: Mathieu Malaterre <malat@debian.org> >Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> >Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> >--- > drivers/base/memory.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++------------------- > drivers/base/node.c | 11 ++++++----- > include/linux/memory.h | 2 +- > include/linux/node.h | 6 ++---- > mm/memory_hotplug.c | 5 +++-- > 5 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-) > >diff --git a/drivers/base/memory.c b/drivers/base/memory.c >index 5a0370f0c506..f28efb0bf5c7 100644 >--- a/drivers/base/memory.c >+++ b/drivers/base/memory.c >@@ -763,32 +763,31 @@ int create_memory_block_devices(unsigned long start, unsigned long size) > return ret; > } > >-void unregister_memory_section(struct mem_section *section) >+/* >+ * Remove memory block devices for the given memory area. Start and size >+ * have to be aligned to memory block granularity. Memory block devices >+ * have to be offline. >+ */ >+void remove_memory_block_devices(unsigned long start, unsigned long size) > { >+ const int start_block_id = pfn_to_block_id(PFN_DOWN(start)); >+ const int end_block_id = pfn_to_block_id(PFN_DOWN(start + size)); > struct memory_block *mem; >+ int block_id; > >- if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!present_section(section))) >+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!IS_ALIGNED(start, memory_block_size_bytes()) || >+ !IS_ALIGNED(size, memory_block_size_bytes()))) > return; > > mutex_lock(&mem_sysfs_mutex); >- >- /* >- * Some users of the memory hotplug do not want/need memblock to >- * track all sections. Skip over those. >- */ >- mem = find_memory_block(section); >- if (!mem) >- goto out_unlock; >- >- unregister_mem_sect_under_nodes(mem, __section_nr(section)); >- >- mem->section_count--; >- if (mem->section_count == 0) >+ for (block_id = start_block_id; block_id != end_block_id; block_id++) { >+ mem = find_memory_block_by_id(block_id, NULL); >+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!mem)) >+ continue; >+ mem->section_count = 0; Is this step necessary? >+ unregister_memory_block_under_nodes(mem); > unregister_memory(mem); >- else >- put_device(&mem->dev); >- >-out_unlock: >+ } > mutex_unlock(&mem_sysfs_mutex); > } > >diff --git a/drivers/base/node.c b/drivers/base/node.c >index 8598fcbd2a17..04fdfa99b8bc 100644 >--- a/drivers/base/node.c >+++ b/drivers/base/node.c >@@ -801,9 +801,10 @@ int register_mem_sect_under_node(struct memory_block *mem_blk, void *arg) > return 0; > } > >-/* unregister memory section under all nodes that it spans */ >-int unregister_mem_sect_under_nodes(struct memory_block *mem_blk, >- unsigned long phys_index) >+/* >+ * Unregister memory block device under all nodes that it spans. >+ */ >+int unregister_memory_block_under_nodes(struct memory_block *mem_blk) > { > NODEMASK_ALLOC(nodemask_t, unlinked_nodes, GFP_KERNEL); > unsigned long pfn, sect_start_pfn, sect_end_pfn; >@@ -816,8 +817,8 @@ int unregister_mem_sect_under_nodes(struct memory_block *mem_blk, > return -ENOMEM; > nodes_clear(*unlinked_nodes); > >- sect_start_pfn = section_nr_to_pfn(phys_index); >- sect_end_pfn = sect_start_pfn + PAGES_PER_SECTION - 1; >+ sect_start_pfn = section_nr_to_pfn(mem_blk->start_section_nr); >+ sect_end_pfn = section_nr_to_pfn(mem_blk->end_section_nr); > for (pfn = sect_start_pfn; pfn <= sect_end_pfn; pfn++) { > int nid; > >diff --git a/include/linux/memory.h b/include/linux/memory.h >index db3e8567f900..f26a5417ec5d 100644 >--- a/include/linux/memory.h >+++ b/include/linux/memory.h >@@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ extern void unregister_memory_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb); > extern int register_memory_isolate_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb); > extern void unregister_memory_isolate_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb); > int create_memory_block_devices(unsigned long start, unsigned long size); >-extern void unregister_memory_section(struct mem_section *); >+void remove_memory_block_devices(unsigned long start, unsigned long size); > extern int memory_dev_init(void); > extern int memory_notify(unsigned long val, void *v); > extern int memory_isolate_notify(unsigned long val, void *v); >diff --git a/include/linux/node.h b/include/linux/node.h >index 1a557c589ecb..02a29e71b175 100644 >--- a/include/linux/node.h >+++ b/include/linux/node.h >@@ -139,8 +139,7 @@ extern int register_cpu_under_node(unsigned int cpu, unsigned int nid); > extern int unregister_cpu_under_node(unsigned int cpu, unsigned int nid); > extern int register_mem_sect_under_node(struct memory_block *mem_blk, > void *arg); >-extern int unregister_mem_sect_under_nodes(struct memory_block *mem_blk, >- unsigned long phys_index); >+extern int unregister_memory_block_under_nodes(struct memory_block *mem_blk); > > extern int register_memory_node_under_compute_node(unsigned int mem_nid, > unsigned int cpu_nid, >@@ -176,8 +175,7 @@ static inline int register_mem_sect_under_node(struct memory_block *mem_blk, > { > return 0; > } >-static inline int unregister_mem_sect_under_nodes(struct memory_block *mem_blk, >- unsigned long phys_index) >+static inline int unregister_memory_block_under_nodes(struct memory_block *mem_blk) > { > return 0; > } >diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c >index 9a92549ef23b..82136c5b4c5f 100644 >--- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c >+++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c >@@ -520,8 +520,6 @@ static void __remove_section(struct zone *zone, struct mem_section *ms, > if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!valid_section(ms))) > return; > >- unregister_memory_section(ms); >- > scn_nr = __section_nr(ms); > start_pfn = section_nr_to_pfn((unsigned long)scn_nr); > __remove_zone(zone, start_pfn); >@@ -1845,6 +1843,9 @@ void __ref __remove_memory(int nid, u64 start, u64 size) > memblock_free(start, size); > memblock_remove(start, size); > >+ /* remove memory block devices before removing memory */ >+ remove_memory_block_devices(start, size); >+ > arch_remove_memory(nid, start, size, NULL); > __release_memory_resource(start, size); > >-- >2.20.1
On 05.06.19 00:07, Wei Yang wrote: > On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 01:11:50PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote: >> Let's factor out removing of memory block devices, which is only >> necessary for memory added via add_memory() and friends that created >> memory block devices. Remove the devices before calling >> arch_remove_memory(). >> >> This finishes factoring out memory block device handling from >> arch_add_memory() and arch_remove_memory(). >> >> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> >> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> >> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> >> Cc: "mike.travis@hpe.com" <mike.travis@hpe.com> >> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> >> Cc: Andrew Banman <andrew.banman@hpe.com> >> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> >> Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> >> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> >> Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> >> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> >> Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> >> Cc: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> >> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> >> Cc: Pavel Tatashin <pavel.tatashin@microsoft.com> >> Cc: Arun KS <arunks@codeaurora.org> >> Cc: Mathieu Malaterre <malat@debian.org> >> Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> >> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> >> --- >> drivers/base/memory.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++------------------- >> drivers/base/node.c | 11 ++++++----- >> include/linux/memory.h | 2 +- >> include/linux/node.h | 6 ++---- >> mm/memory_hotplug.c | 5 +++-- >> 5 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/base/memory.c b/drivers/base/memory.c >> index 5a0370f0c506..f28efb0bf5c7 100644 >> --- a/drivers/base/memory.c >> +++ b/drivers/base/memory.c >> @@ -763,32 +763,31 @@ int create_memory_block_devices(unsigned long start, unsigned long size) >> return ret; >> } >> >> -void unregister_memory_section(struct mem_section *section) >> +/* >> + * Remove memory block devices for the given memory area. Start and size >> + * have to be aligned to memory block granularity. Memory block devices >> + * have to be offline. >> + */ >> +void remove_memory_block_devices(unsigned long start, unsigned long size) >> { >> + const int start_block_id = pfn_to_block_id(PFN_DOWN(start)); >> + const int end_block_id = pfn_to_block_id(PFN_DOWN(start + size)); >> struct memory_block *mem; >> + int block_id; >> >> - if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!present_section(section))) >> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!IS_ALIGNED(start, memory_block_size_bytes()) || >> + !IS_ALIGNED(size, memory_block_size_bytes()))) >> return; >> >> mutex_lock(&mem_sysfs_mutex); >> - >> - /* >> - * Some users of the memory hotplug do not want/need memblock to >> - * track all sections. Skip over those. >> - */ >> - mem = find_memory_block(section); >> - if (!mem) >> - goto out_unlock; >> - >> - unregister_mem_sect_under_nodes(mem, __section_nr(section)); >> - >> - mem->section_count--; >> - if (mem->section_count == 0) >> + for (block_id = start_block_id; block_id != end_block_id; block_id++) { >> + mem = find_memory_block_by_id(block_id, NULL); >> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!mem)) >> + continue; >> + mem->section_count = 0; > > Is this step necessary? It's what the previous code does, it might not be - I'll leave it like that for now. As mentioned in another reply, I might remove the section_count completely, eventually.
On Mon 27-05-19 13:11:50, David Hildenbrand wrote: > Let's factor out removing of memory block devices, which is only > necessary for memory added via add_memory() and friends that created > memory block devices. Remove the devices before calling > arch_remove_memory(). > > This finishes factoring out memory block device handling from > arch_add_memory() and arch_remove_memory(). OK, this makes sense again. Just a nit. Calling find_memory_block_by_id for each memory block looks a bit suboptimal, especially when we are removing consequent physical memblocks. I have to confess that I do not know how expensive is the search and I also expect that there won't be that many memblocks in the removed range anyway as large setups have large memblocks. > Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> > Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> > Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> > Cc: "mike.travis@hpe.com" <mike.travis@hpe.com> > Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> > Cc: Andrew Banman <andrew.banman@hpe.com> > Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> > Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> > Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> > Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> > Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> > Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> > Cc: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> > Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> > Cc: Pavel Tatashin <pavel.tatashin@microsoft.com> > Cc: Arun KS <arunks@codeaurora.org> > Cc: Mathieu Malaterre <malat@debian.org> > Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> > Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Other than that looks good to me. Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> > --- > drivers/base/memory.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++------------------- > drivers/base/node.c | 11 ++++++----- > include/linux/memory.h | 2 +- > include/linux/node.h | 6 ++---- > mm/memory_hotplug.c | 5 +++-- > 5 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/base/memory.c b/drivers/base/memory.c > index 5a0370f0c506..f28efb0bf5c7 100644 > --- a/drivers/base/memory.c > +++ b/drivers/base/memory.c > @@ -763,32 +763,31 @@ int create_memory_block_devices(unsigned long start, unsigned long size) > return ret; > } > > -void unregister_memory_section(struct mem_section *section) > +/* > + * Remove memory block devices for the given memory area. Start and size > + * have to be aligned to memory block granularity. Memory block devices > + * have to be offline. > + */ > +void remove_memory_block_devices(unsigned long start, unsigned long size) > { > + const int start_block_id = pfn_to_block_id(PFN_DOWN(start)); > + const int end_block_id = pfn_to_block_id(PFN_DOWN(start + size)); > struct memory_block *mem; > + int block_id; > > - if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!present_section(section))) > + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!IS_ALIGNED(start, memory_block_size_bytes()) || > + !IS_ALIGNED(size, memory_block_size_bytes()))) > return; > > mutex_lock(&mem_sysfs_mutex); > - > - /* > - * Some users of the memory hotplug do not want/need memblock to > - * track all sections. Skip over those. > - */ > - mem = find_memory_block(section); > - if (!mem) > - goto out_unlock; > - > - unregister_mem_sect_under_nodes(mem, __section_nr(section)); > - > - mem->section_count--; > - if (mem->section_count == 0) > + for (block_id = start_block_id; block_id != end_block_id; block_id++) { > + mem = find_memory_block_by_id(block_id, NULL); > + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!mem)) > + continue; > + mem->section_count = 0; > + unregister_memory_block_under_nodes(mem); > unregister_memory(mem); > - else > - put_device(&mem->dev); > - > -out_unlock: > + } > mutex_unlock(&mem_sysfs_mutex); > } > > diff --git a/drivers/base/node.c b/drivers/base/node.c > index 8598fcbd2a17..04fdfa99b8bc 100644 > --- a/drivers/base/node.c > +++ b/drivers/base/node.c > @@ -801,9 +801,10 @@ int register_mem_sect_under_node(struct memory_block *mem_blk, void *arg) > return 0; > } > > -/* unregister memory section under all nodes that it spans */ > -int unregister_mem_sect_under_nodes(struct memory_block *mem_blk, > - unsigned long phys_index) > +/* > + * Unregister memory block device under all nodes that it spans. > + */ > +int unregister_memory_block_under_nodes(struct memory_block *mem_blk) > { > NODEMASK_ALLOC(nodemask_t, unlinked_nodes, GFP_KERNEL); > unsigned long pfn, sect_start_pfn, sect_end_pfn; > @@ -816,8 +817,8 @@ int unregister_mem_sect_under_nodes(struct memory_block *mem_blk, > return -ENOMEM; > nodes_clear(*unlinked_nodes); > > - sect_start_pfn = section_nr_to_pfn(phys_index); > - sect_end_pfn = sect_start_pfn + PAGES_PER_SECTION - 1; > + sect_start_pfn = section_nr_to_pfn(mem_blk->start_section_nr); > + sect_end_pfn = section_nr_to_pfn(mem_blk->end_section_nr); > for (pfn = sect_start_pfn; pfn <= sect_end_pfn; pfn++) { > int nid; > > diff --git a/include/linux/memory.h b/include/linux/memory.h > index db3e8567f900..f26a5417ec5d 100644 > --- a/include/linux/memory.h > +++ b/include/linux/memory.h > @@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ extern void unregister_memory_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb); > extern int register_memory_isolate_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb); > extern void unregister_memory_isolate_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb); > int create_memory_block_devices(unsigned long start, unsigned long size); > -extern void unregister_memory_section(struct mem_section *); > +void remove_memory_block_devices(unsigned long start, unsigned long size); > extern int memory_dev_init(void); > extern int memory_notify(unsigned long val, void *v); > extern int memory_isolate_notify(unsigned long val, void *v); > diff --git a/include/linux/node.h b/include/linux/node.h > index 1a557c589ecb..02a29e71b175 100644 > --- a/include/linux/node.h > +++ b/include/linux/node.h > @@ -139,8 +139,7 @@ extern int register_cpu_under_node(unsigned int cpu, unsigned int nid); > extern int unregister_cpu_under_node(unsigned int cpu, unsigned int nid); > extern int register_mem_sect_under_node(struct memory_block *mem_blk, > void *arg); > -extern int unregister_mem_sect_under_nodes(struct memory_block *mem_blk, > - unsigned long phys_index); > +extern int unregister_memory_block_under_nodes(struct memory_block *mem_blk); > > extern int register_memory_node_under_compute_node(unsigned int mem_nid, > unsigned int cpu_nid, > @@ -176,8 +175,7 @@ static inline int register_mem_sect_under_node(struct memory_block *mem_blk, > { > return 0; > } > -static inline int unregister_mem_sect_under_nodes(struct memory_block *mem_blk, > - unsigned long phys_index) > +static inline int unregister_memory_block_under_nodes(struct memory_block *mem_blk) > { > return 0; > } > diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c > index 9a92549ef23b..82136c5b4c5f 100644 > --- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c > +++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c > @@ -520,8 +520,6 @@ static void __remove_section(struct zone *zone, struct mem_section *ms, > if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!valid_section(ms))) > return; > > - unregister_memory_section(ms); > - > scn_nr = __section_nr(ms); > start_pfn = section_nr_to_pfn((unsigned long)scn_nr); > __remove_zone(zone, start_pfn); > @@ -1845,6 +1843,9 @@ void __ref __remove_memory(int nid, u64 start, u64 size) > memblock_free(start, size); > memblock_remove(start, size); > > + /* remove memory block devices before removing memory */ > + remove_memory_block_devices(start, size); > + > arch_remove_memory(nid, start, size, NULL); > __release_memory_resource(start, size); > > -- > 2.20.1 >
On 01.07.19 10:41, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Mon 27-05-19 13:11:50, David Hildenbrand wrote: >> Let's factor out removing of memory block devices, which is only >> necessary for memory added via add_memory() and friends that created >> memory block devices. Remove the devices before calling >> arch_remove_memory(). >> >> This finishes factoring out memory block device handling from >> arch_add_memory() and arch_remove_memory(). > > OK, this makes sense again. Just a nit. Calling find_memory_block_by_id > for each memory block looks a bit suboptimal, especially when we are > removing consequent physical memblocks. I have to confess that I do not > know how expensive is the search and I also expect that there won't be > that many memblocks in the removed range anyway as large setups have > large memblocks. > The devices are not allocated sequentially, so there is no easy way to look them up. There is a comment for find_memory_block(): "For now, we have a linear search to go find the appropriate memory_block corresponding to a particular phys_index. If this gets to be a real problem, we can always use a radix tree or something here." So if this becomes a problem, we need a separate data structure to speed up the lookup. (IOW, this was already the same in the old code) Thanks!
diff --git a/drivers/base/memory.c b/drivers/base/memory.c index 5a0370f0c506..f28efb0bf5c7 100644 --- a/drivers/base/memory.c +++ b/drivers/base/memory.c @@ -763,32 +763,31 @@ int create_memory_block_devices(unsigned long start, unsigned long size) return ret; } -void unregister_memory_section(struct mem_section *section) +/* + * Remove memory block devices for the given memory area. Start and size + * have to be aligned to memory block granularity. Memory block devices + * have to be offline. + */ +void remove_memory_block_devices(unsigned long start, unsigned long size) { + const int start_block_id = pfn_to_block_id(PFN_DOWN(start)); + const int end_block_id = pfn_to_block_id(PFN_DOWN(start + size)); struct memory_block *mem; + int block_id; - if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!present_section(section))) + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!IS_ALIGNED(start, memory_block_size_bytes()) || + !IS_ALIGNED(size, memory_block_size_bytes()))) return; mutex_lock(&mem_sysfs_mutex); - - /* - * Some users of the memory hotplug do not want/need memblock to - * track all sections. Skip over those. - */ - mem = find_memory_block(section); - if (!mem) - goto out_unlock; - - unregister_mem_sect_under_nodes(mem, __section_nr(section)); - - mem->section_count--; - if (mem->section_count == 0) + for (block_id = start_block_id; block_id != end_block_id; block_id++) { + mem = find_memory_block_by_id(block_id, NULL); + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!mem)) + continue; + mem->section_count = 0; + unregister_memory_block_under_nodes(mem); unregister_memory(mem); - else - put_device(&mem->dev); - -out_unlock: + } mutex_unlock(&mem_sysfs_mutex); } diff --git a/drivers/base/node.c b/drivers/base/node.c index 8598fcbd2a17..04fdfa99b8bc 100644 --- a/drivers/base/node.c +++ b/drivers/base/node.c @@ -801,9 +801,10 @@ int register_mem_sect_under_node(struct memory_block *mem_blk, void *arg) return 0; } -/* unregister memory section under all nodes that it spans */ -int unregister_mem_sect_under_nodes(struct memory_block *mem_blk, - unsigned long phys_index) +/* + * Unregister memory block device under all nodes that it spans. + */ +int unregister_memory_block_under_nodes(struct memory_block *mem_blk) { NODEMASK_ALLOC(nodemask_t, unlinked_nodes, GFP_KERNEL); unsigned long pfn, sect_start_pfn, sect_end_pfn; @@ -816,8 +817,8 @@ int unregister_mem_sect_under_nodes(struct memory_block *mem_blk, return -ENOMEM; nodes_clear(*unlinked_nodes); - sect_start_pfn = section_nr_to_pfn(phys_index); - sect_end_pfn = sect_start_pfn + PAGES_PER_SECTION - 1; + sect_start_pfn = section_nr_to_pfn(mem_blk->start_section_nr); + sect_end_pfn = section_nr_to_pfn(mem_blk->end_section_nr); for (pfn = sect_start_pfn; pfn <= sect_end_pfn; pfn++) { int nid; diff --git a/include/linux/memory.h b/include/linux/memory.h index db3e8567f900..f26a5417ec5d 100644 --- a/include/linux/memory.h +++ b/include/linux/memory.h @@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ extern void unregister_memory_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb); extern int register_memory_isolate_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb); extern void unregister_memory_isolate_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb); int create_memory_block_devices(unsigned long start, unsigned long size); -extern void unregister_memory_section(struct mem_section *); +void remove_memory_block_devices(unsigned long start, unsigned long size); extern int memory_dev_init(void); extern int memory_notify(unsigned long val, void *v); extern int memory_isolate_notify(unsigned long val, void *v); diff --git a/include/linux/node.h b/include/linux/node.h index 1a557c589ecb..02a29e71b175 100644 --- a/include/linux/node.h +++ b/include/linux/node.h @@ -139,8 +139,7 @@ extern int register_cpu_under_node(unsigned int cpu, unsigned int nid); extern int unregister_cpu_under_node(unsigned int cpu, unsigned int nid); extern int register_mem_sect_under_node(struct memory_block *mem_blk, void *arg); -extern int unregister_mem_sect_under_nodes(struct memory_block *mem_blk, - unsigned long phys_index); +extern int unregister_memory_block_under_nodes(struct memory_block *mem_blk); extern int register_memory_node_under_compute_node(unsigned int mem_nid, unsigned int cpu_nid, @@ -176,8 +175,7 @@ static inline int register_mem_sect_under_node(struct memory_block *mem_blk, { return 0; } -static inline int unregister_mem_sect_under_nodes(struct memory_block *mem_blk, - unsigned long phys_index) +static inline int unregister_memory_block_under_nodes(struct memory_block *mem_blk) { return 0; } diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c index 9a92549ef23b..82136c5b4c5f 100644 --- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c +++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c @@ -520,8 +520,6 @@ static void __remove_section(struct zone *zone, struct mem_section *ms, if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!valid_section(ms))) return; - unregister_memory_section(ms); - scn_nr = __section_nr(ms); start_pfn = section_nr_to_pfn((unsigned long)scn_nr); __remove_zone(zone, start_pfn); @@ -1845,6 +1843,9 @@ void __ref __remove_memory(int nid, u64 start, u64 size) memblock_free(start, size); memblock_remove(start, size); + /* remove memory block devices before removing memory */ + remove_memory_block_devices(start, size); + arch_remove_memory(nid, start, size, NULL); __release_memory_resource(start, size);