From patchwork Thu Feb 20 04:33:14 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Baoquan He X-Patchwork-Id: 11393291 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1009D13A4 for ; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 04:34:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0C4C2467A for ; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 04:34:01 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="Z4mSVyN8" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org D0C4C2467A Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id E95F56B000C; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 23:34:00 -0500 (EST) Delivered-To: linux-mm-outgoing@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id E22A66B000D; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 23:34:00 -0500 (EST) X-Original-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id C723B6B000E; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 23:34:00 -0500 (EST) X-Original-To: linux-mm@kvack.org X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0242.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.242]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADCF86B000C for ; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 23:34:00 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin25.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay03.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AA37824805A for ; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 04:34:00 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 76509237840.25.fear96_22f5e6d4a1713 X-Spam-Summary: 1,0,0,,d41d8cd98f00b204,bhe@redhat.com,:linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org::akpm@linux-foundation.org:richardw.yang@linux.intel.com:david@redhat.com:osalvador@suse.de:dan.j.williams@intel.com:mhocko@suse.com:bhe@redhat.com:rppt@linux.ibm.com:robin.murphy@arm.com,RULES_HIT:30012:30054:30074,0,RBL:205.139.110.120:@redhat.com:.lbl8.mailshell.net-62.18.0.100 66.10.201.10,CacheIP:none,Bayesian:0.5,0.5,0.5,Netcheck:none,DomainCache:0,MSF:not bulk,SPF:ft,MSBL:0,DNSBL:neutral,Custom_rules:0:0:0,LFtime:24,LUA_SUMMARY:none X-HE-Tag: fear96_22f5e6d4a1713 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 4992 Received: from us-smtp-1.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com [205.139.110.120]) by imf23.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 04:34:00 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1582173239; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=9GUV7ZJmC2qQXzHNAmZVY0tFi2CtcIn1WjDc/UVGLOM=; b=Z4mSVyN8FZwomC0LHBRs9c2yHXR8tzwHW8qFcPUHJ64BjhZEcXTS120ZjeqF7wT80WN9zy VD63hL2l6M317k9AKu9R2gB6e/T6OmdrGmJJRxfntUDen/5MANJbE6kttvtW4WzAUe5kSu /HoT6V1oaKUNCM3tiyMGaQpAvgqFfXo= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-118-spB0LoAhN9eMFmFDFL6hzA-1; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 23:33:57 -0500 X-MC-Unique: spB0LoAhN9eMFmFDFL6hzA-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8CFBF801E5C; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 04:33:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from MiWiFi-R3L-srv.redhat.com (ovpn-12-32.pek2.redhat.com [10.72.12.32]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 234A95DA60; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 04:33:51 +0000 (UTC) From: Baoquan He To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, richardw.yang@linux.intel.com, david@redhat.com, osalvador@suse.de, dan.j.williams@intel.com, mhocko@suse.com, bhe@redhat.com, rppt@linux.ibm.com, robin.murphy@arm.com Subject: [PATCH v2 5/7] mm/sparse.c: add code comment about sub-section hotplug Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2020 12:33:14 +0800 Message-Id: <20200220043316.19668-6-bhe@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20200220043316.19668-1-bhe@redhat.com> References: <20200220043316.19668-1-bhe@redhat.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.14 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: It's helpful to note that sub-section is only supported in SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP case, but not in SPARSEMEM|!VMEMMAP case. Add sentences into the code comment above sparse_add_section. And also move the code comments from inside section_deactivate() to be above it. The code comments are reasonable to the whole function, and the moving makes code cleaner. Signed-off-by: Baoquan He --- mm/sparse.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------------- 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) diff --git a/mm/sparse.c b/mm/sparse.c index 66c497d6a229..14bff0b44e7c 100644 --- a/mm/sparse.c +++ b/mm/sparse.c @@ -778,6 +778,22 @@ static int clear_subsection_map(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long nr_pages) } #endif +/* + * To deactivate a memory region, there are 3 cases to handle across + * two configurations (SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP={y,n}): + * + * 1. deactivation of a partial hot-added section (only possible in + * the SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP=y case). + * a) section was present at memory init + * b) section was hot-added post memory init + * 2. deactivation of a complete hot-added section. + * 3. deactivation of a complete section from memory init. + * + * For case 1, when subsection_map does not empty we will not be freeing + * the usage map, but still need to free the vmemmap range. + * + * For case 2 and 3, the SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP={y,n} cases are unified. + */ static void section_deactivate(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long nr_pages, struct vmem_altmap *altmap) { @@ -790,23 +806,7 @@ static void section_deactivate(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long nr_pages, rc = clear_subsection_map(pfn, nr_pages); if(IS_ERR_VALUE((unsigned long)rc)) return; - /* - * There are 3 cases to handle across two configurations - * (SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP={y,n}): - * - * 1/ deactivation of a partial hot-added section (only possible - * in the SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP=y case). - * a/ section was present at memory init - * b/ section was hot-added post memory init - * 2/ deactivation of a complete hot-added section - * 3/ deactivation of a complete section from memory init - * - * For 1/, when subsection_map does not empty we will not be - * freeing the usage map, but still need to free the vmemmap - * range. - * - * For 2/ and 3/ the SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP={y,n} cases are unified - */ + if (!rc) { unsigned long section_nr = pfn_to_section_nr(pfn); @@ -926,6 +926,11 @@ static struct page * __meminit section_activate(int nid, unsigned long pfn, * * This is only intended for hotplug. * + * Note that the added memory region is either section aligned, or + * sub-section aligned. The subsection hotplug is only supported in + * VMEMMAP case, please refer to ZONE_DEVICE part of memory-model.rst + * for more details. + * * Return: * * 0 - On success. * * -EEXIST - Section has been present.