Message ID | 20200612174437.GA391453@chrisdown.name (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | mm, memcg: prevent missed memory.low load tears | expand |
On Fri 12-06-20 18:44:37, Chris Down wrote: > Looks like one of these got missed when massaging in f86b810c2610 ("mm, > memcg: prevent memory.low load/store tearing") with other linux-mm > changes. > > Reported-by: Michal Koutný <mkoutny@suse.com> > Signed-off-by: Chris Down <chris@chrisdown.name> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> > --- > mm/memcontrol.c | 5 +++-- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c > index 0b38b6ad547d..f7cc66a80348 100644 > --- a/mm/memcontrol.c > +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c > @@ -6416,7 +6416,7 @@ enum mem_cgroup_protection mem_cgroup_protected(struct mem_cgroup *root, > > if (parent == root) { > memcg->memory.emin = READ_ONCE(memcg->memory.min); > - memcg->memory.elow = memcg->memory.low; > + memcg->memory.elow = READ_ONCE(memcg->memory.low); > goto out; > } > > @@ -6428,7 +6428,8 @@ enum mem_cgroup_protection mem_cgroup_protected(struct mem_cgroup *root, > atomic_long_read(&parent->memory.children_min_usage))); > > WRITE_ONCE(memcg->memory.elow, effective_protection(usage, parent_usage, > - memcg->memory.low, READ_ONCE(parent->memory.elow), > + READ_ONCE(memcg->memory.low), > + READ_ONCE(parent->memory.elow), > atomic_long_read(&parent->memory.children_low_usage))); > > out: > -- > 2.27.0 >
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c index 0b38b6ad547d..f7cc66a80348 100644 --- a/mm/memcontrol.c +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c @@ -6416,7 +6416,7 @@ enum mem_cgroup_protection mem_cgroup_protected(struct mem_cgroup *root, if (parent == root) { memcg->memory.emin = READ_ONCE(memcg->memory.min); - memcg->memory.elow = memcg->memory.low; + memcg->memory.elow = READ_ONCE(memcg->memory.low); goto out; } @@ -6428,7 +6428,8 @@ enum mem_cgroup_protection mem_cgroup_protected(struct mem_cgroup *root, atomic_long_read(&parent->memory.children_min_usage))); WRITE_ONCE(memcg->memory.elow, effective_protection(usage, parent_usage, - memcg->memory.low, READ_ONCE(parent->memory.elow), + READ_ONCE(memcg->memory.low), + READ_ONCE(parent->memory.elow), atomic_long_read(&parent->memory.children_low_usage))); out:
Looks like one of these got missed when massaging in f86b810c2610 ("mm, memcg: prevent memory.low load/store tearing") with other linux-mm changes. Reported-by: Michal Koutný <mkoutny@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Down <chris@chrisdown.name> --- mm/memcontrol.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)