@@ -1131,6 +1131,8 @@ static u64 read_id_reg(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
if (!vcpu_has_sve(vcpu))
val &= ~(0xfUL << ID_AA64PFR0_SVE_SHIFT);
val &= ~(0xfUL << ID_AA64PFR0_AMU_SHIFT);
+ } else if (id == SYS_ID_AA64PFR1_EL1) {
+ val &= ~(0xfUL << ID_AA64PFR1_MTE_SHIFT);
} else if (id == SYS_ID_AA64ISAR1_EL1 && !vcpu_has_ptrauth(vcpu)) {
val &= ~((0xfUL << ID_AA64ISAR1_APA_SHIFT) |
(0xfUL << ID_AA64ISAR1_API_SHIFT) |
@@ -1382,6 +1384,13 @@ static bool access_ccsidr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct sys_reg_params *p,
return true;
}
+static bool access_mte_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct sys_reg_params *p,
+ const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
+{
+ kvm_inject_undefined(vcpu);
+ return false;
+}
+
/* sys_reg_desc initialiser for known cpufeature ID registers */
#define ID_SANITISED(name) { \
SYS_DESC(SYS_##name), \
@@ -1547,6 +1556,10 @@ static const struct sys_reg_desc sys_reg_descs[] = {
{ SYS_DESC(SYS_SCTLR_EL1), access_vm_reg, reset_val, SCTLR_EL1, 0x00C50078 },
{ SYS_DESC(SYS_ACTLR_EL1), access_actlr, reset_actlr, ACTLR_EL1 },
{ SYS_DESC(SYS_CPACR_EL1), NULL, reset_val, CPACR_EL1, 0 },
+
+ { SYS_DESC(SYS_RGSR_EL1), access_mte_regs },
+ { SYS_DESC(SYS_GCR_EL1), access_mte_regs },
+
{ SYS_DESC(SYS_ZCR_EL1), NULL, reset_val, ZCR_EL1, 0, .visibility = sve_visibility },
{ SYS_DESC(SYS_TTBR0_EL1), access_vm_reg, reset_unknown, TTBR0_EL1 },
{ SYS_DESC(SYS_TTBR1_EL1), access_vm_reg, reset_unknown, TTBR1_EL1 },
@@ -1571,6 +1584,9 @@ static const struct sys_reg_desc sys_reg_descs[] = {
{ SYS_DESC(SYS_ERXMISC0_EL1), trap_raz_wi },
{ SYS_DESC(SYS_ERXMISC1_EL1), trap_raz_wi },
+ { SYS_DESC(SYS_TFSR_EL1), access_mte_regs },
+ { SYS_DESC(SYS_TFSRE0_EL1), access_mte_regs },
+
{ SYS_DESC(SYS_FAR_EL1), access_vm_reg, reset_unknown, FAR_EL1 },
{ SYS_DESC(SYS_PAR_EL1), NULL, reset_unknown, PAR_EL1 },
KVM does not support MTE in guests yet, so clear the corresponding field in the ID_AA64PFR1_EL1 register. In addition, inject an undefined exception in the guest if it accesses one of the GCR_EL1, RGSR_EL1, TFSR_EL1 or TFSRE0_EL1 registers. While the emulate_sys_reg() function already injects an undefined exception, this patch prevents the unnecessary printk. Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Cc: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com> --- Notes: New in v9 (the ID register field hiding was moved here from an earlier patch). arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)