Message ID | 20210207152148.1285842-1-shakeelb@google.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | mm/list_lru.c: remove kvfree_rcu_local() | expand |
> The list_lru file used to have local kvfree_rcu() which was renamed by > commit e0feed08ab41 ("mm/list_lru.c: Rename kvfree_rcu() to local > variant") to introduce the globally visible kvfree_rcu(). Now we have > global kvfree_rcu(), so remove the local kvfree_rcu_local() and just > use the global one. > > Signed-off-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> > --- > mm/list_lru.c | 12 ++---------- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/mm/list_lru.c b/mm/list_lru.c > index fe230081690b..6f067b6b935f 100644 > --- a/mm/list_lru.c > +++ b/mm/list_lru.c > @@ -373,21 +373,13 @@ static void memcg_destroy_list_lru_node(struct list_lru_node *nlru) > struct list_lru_memcg *memcg_lrus; > /* > * This is called when shrinker has already been unregistered, > - * and nobody can use it. So, there is no need to use kvfree_rcu_local(). > + * and nobody can use it. So, there is no need to use kvfree_rcu(). > */ > memcg_lrus = rcu_dereference_protected(nlru->memcg_lrus, true); > __memcg_destroy_list_lru_node(memcg_lrus, 0, memcg_nr_cache_ids); > kvfree(memcg_lrus); > } > > -static void kvfree_rcu_local(struct rcu_head *head) > -{ > - struct list_lru_memcg *mlru; > - > - mlru = container_of(head, struct list_lru_memcg, rcu); > - kvfree(mlru); > -} > - > static int memcg_update_list_lru_node(struct list_lru_node *nlru, > int old_size, int new_size) > { > @@ -419,7 +411,7 @@ static int memcg_update_list_lru_node(struct list_lru_node *nlru, > rcu_assign_pointer(nlru->memcg_lrus, new); > spin_unlock_irq(&nlru->lock); > > - call_rcu(&old->rcu, kvfree_rcu_local); > + kvfree_rcu(old, rcu); > return 0; > } > > -- > 2.30.0.478.g8a0d178c01-goog > Reviewed-by: Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com> -- Vlad Rezki
On 07.02.2021 18:21, Shakeel Butt wrote: > The list_lru file used to have local kvfree_rcu() which was renamed by > commit e0feed08ab41 ("mm/list_lru.c: Rename kvfree_rcu() to local > variant") to introduce the globally visible kvfree_rcu(). Now we have > global kvfree_rcu(), so remove the local kvfree_rcu_local() and just > use the global one. > > Signed-off-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Reviewed-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com> > --- > mm/list_lru.c | 12 ++---------- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/mm/list_lru.c b/mm/list_lru.c > index fe230081690b..6f067b6b935f 100644 > --- a/mm/list_lru.c > +++ b/mm/list_lru.c > @@ -373,21 +373,13 @@ static void memcg_destroy_list_lru_node(struct list_lru_node *nlru) > struct list_lru_memcg *memcg_lrus; > /* > * This is called when shrinker has already been unregistered, > - * and nobody can use it. So, there is no need to use kvfree_rcu_local(). > + * and nobody can use it. So, there is no need to use kvfree_rcu(). > */ > memcg_lrus = rcu_dereference_protected(nlru->memcg_lrus, true); > __memcg_destroy_list_lru_node(memcg_lrus, 0, memcg_nr_cache_ids); > kvfree(memcg_lrus); > } > > -static void kvfree_rcu_local(struct rcu_head *head) > -{ > - struct list_lru_memcg *mlru; > - > - mlru = container_of(head, struct list_lru_memcg, rcu); > - kvfree(mlru); > -} > - > static int memcg_update_list_lru_node(struct list_lru_node *nlru, > int old_size, int new_size) > { > @@ -419,7 +411,7 @@ static int memcg_update_list_lru_node(struct list_lru_node *nlru, > rcu_assign_pointer(nlru->memcg_lrus, new); > spin_unlock_irq(&nlru->lock); > > - call_rcu(&old->rcu, kvfree_rcu_local); > + kvfree_rcu(old, rcu); > return 0; > } > >
diff --git a/mm/list_lru.c b/mm/list_lru.c index fe230081690b..6f067b6b935f 100644 --- a/mm/list_lru.c +++ b/mm/list_lru.c @@ -373,21 +373,13 @@ static void memcg_destroy_list_lru_node(struct list_lru_node *nlru) struct list_lru_memcg *memcg_lrus; /* * This is called when shrinker has already been unregistered, - * and nobody can use it. So, there is no need to use kvfree_rcu_local(). + * and nobody can use it. So, there is no need to use kvfree_rcu(). */ memcg_lrus = rcu_dereference_protected(nlru->memcg_lrus, true); __memcg_destroy_list_lru_node(memcg_lrus, 0, memcg_nr_cache_ids); kvfree(memcg_lrus); } -static void kvfree_rcu_local(struct rcu_head *head) -{ - struct list_lru_memcg *mlru; - - mlru = container_of(head, struct list_lru_memcg, rcu); - kvfree(mlru); -} - static int memcg_update_list_lru_node(struct list_lru_node *nlru, int old_size, int new_size) { @@ -419,7 +411,7 @@ static int memcg_update_list_lru_node(struct list_lru_node *nlru, rcu_assign_pointer(nlru->memcg_lrus, new); spin_unlock_irq(&nlru->lock); - call_rcu(&old->rcu, kvfree_rcu_local); + kvfree_rcu(old, rcu); return 0; }
The list_lru file used to have local kvfree_rcu() which was renamed by commit e0feed08ab41 ("mm/list_lru.c: Rename kvfree_rcu() to local variant") to introduce the globally visible kvfree_rcu(). Now we have global kvfree_rcu(), so remove the local kvfree_rcu_local() and just use the global one. Signed-off-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> --- mm/list_lru.c | 12 ++---------- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)