From patchwork Wed Feb 17 00:13:12 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Yang Shi X-Patchwork-Id: 12090773 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-13.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN, FREEMAIL_FROM,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FD71C433E6 for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 00:13:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C97A064DFF for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 00:13:37 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org C97A064DFF Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id DF71C8D000B; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 19:13:36 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id D7F7A6B007E; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 19:13:36 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id BA9D08D000B; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 19:13:36 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0124.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.124]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F34D6B007D for ; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 19:13:36 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin26.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay05.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C8771801D450 for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 00:13:36 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 77825836032.26.9EA0692 Received: from mail-pf1-f169.google.com (mail-pf1-f169.google.com [209.85.210.169]) by imf01.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B582D2000D81 for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 00:13:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pf1-f169.google.com with SMTP id k13so7220383pfh.13 for ; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 16:13:35 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=9kmwvTRVdVE30SERAs5GtvM6Gm5zn00pBYFxryVSYDw=; b=Apl5JLsT8gxKLTZobcVZz6rQgkrf7fQH/siVQrIumS8tleaop2xVxnCc1CVoVkVJle rEBSWCXJ4hgljG6TwwrSCSET42iM1SypFs4U9pXsbsGS9cN1u+TN9L1qYNRvDz3LItls Ge3B/4WeTdat0V1dhsU6QowLkWjm7g+w17A6BFufm8mkrMno6SUeQD2CQhHKuOPF7Uxk zU1c6ZKQsWhYDuEtW7kYlqmyD2hruwXytfAMU8YVYBuncyTrbQHQMP3LHOORQ9WL2uH4 4ao0Lx3XyQx7Qi851KdhTdcmrGzoI+2PT6TZiSWkVELbysIpYRKOcVkE6dI01pF14uzo dfWQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=9kmwvTRVdVE30SERAs5GtvM6Gm5zn00pBYFxryVSYDw=; b=Pal6mUO6H+EysZvfvOs3oxVHJU3utXBqe6Agy6ppdrtOYkNCwtmmov6BD4Tpw0GrBi gCG5B5jgV48kOapdMfQGEEfxTpjbpSi+LwFrxYPG9AGNsx06FkUoo1TnxVM5Q8B7l359 7KTu2B0dcGcTzyeSOpqGHJeTNzUoMVVXRlOJjf7Zg7HHh/6ZiSe76JSfd5KbLn+R3L1Z tWD4cFy7AOoxZ0m/KPoUz6dDDzZtDlchQFoY4h85pAzDl307DWtR89gxmPZHIuhcUG6A E6GEm6ZajC4g+Az9vA4oUBXPpHEy3iwkDR9jQAhEosDPYf79at5ipQ3XZET/ttxGgvp1 oEQw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531nwfQ163jUckU2QxSI6ae2T0LPnvMe8iXo6x947GJ2NaCmdXOs No1KaAUtpnccEfy18CXwh4o= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxwYwEKGAq8dceduxuD8dwCPV4j9BtMWCo2ogoZYclu44P7088TKtQSQLx9LwfhLkUdFWexiw== X-Received: by 2002:a62:b410:0:b029:1a4:7868:7e4e with SMTP id h16-20020a62b4100000b02901a478687e4emr215718pfn.62.1613520815217; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 16:13:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (c-73-93-239-127.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [73.93.239.127]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y12sm99220pjc.56.2021.02.16.16.13.33 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 16 Feb 2021 16:13:34 -0800 (PST) From: Yang Shi To: guro@fb.com, ktkhai@virtuozzo.com, vbabka@suse.cz, shakeelb@google.com, david@fromorbit.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org, mhocko@suse.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org Cc: shy828301@gmail.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [v8 PATCH 03/13] mm: vmscan: use shrinker_rwsem to protect shrinker_maps allocation Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2021 16:13:12 -0800 Message-Id: <20210217001322.2226796-4-shy828301@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.26.2 In-Reply-To: <20210217001322.2226796-1-shy828301@gmail.com> References: <20210217001322.2226796-1-shy828301@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Rspamd-Server: rspam04 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: B582D2000D81 X-Stat-Signature: x6sah8j8mgdrhhx5s68w458c4ow5rapn Received-SPF: none (gmail.com>: No applicable sender policy available) receiver=imf01; identity=mailfrom; envelope-from=""; helo=mail-pf1-f169.google.com; client-ip=209.85.210.169 X-HE-DKIM-Result: pass/pass X-HE-Tag: 1613520815-611312 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: Since memcg_shrinker_map_size just can be changed under holding shrinker_rwsem exclusively, the read side can be protected by holding read lock, so it sounds superfluous to have a dedicated mutex. Kirill Tkhai suggested use write lock since: * We want the assignment to shrinker_maps is visible for shrink_slab_memcg(). * The rcu_dereference_protected() dereferrencing in shrink_slab_memcg(), but in case of we use READ lock in alloc_shrinker_maps(), the dereferrencing is not actually protected. * READ lock makes alloc_shrinker_info() racy against memory allocation fail. alloc_shrinker_info()->free_shrinker_info() may free memory right after shrink_slab_memcg() dereferenced it. You may say shrink_slab_memcg()->mem_cgroup_online() protects us from it? Yes, sure, but this is not the thing we want to remember in the future, since this spreads modularity. And a test with heavy paging workload didn't show write lock makes things worse. Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka Acked-by: Kirill Tkhai Acked-by: Roman Gushchin Signed-off-by: Yang Shi Reviewed-by: Shakeel Butt --- mm/vmscan.c | 18 ++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c index 96b08c79f18d..543af6ec1e02 100644 --- a/mm/vmscan.c +++ b/mm/vmscan.c @@ -187,7 +187,6 @@ static DECLARE_RWSEM(shrinker_rwsem); #ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG static int memcg_shrinker_map_size; -static DEFINE_MUTEX(memcg_shrinker_map_mutex); static void free_shrinker_map_rcu(struct rcu_head *head) { @@ -200,8 +199,6 @@ static int expand_one_shrinker_map(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, struct memcg_shrinker_map *new, *old; int nid; - lockdep_assert_held(&memcg_shrinker_map_mutex); - for_each_node(nid) { old = rcu_dereference_protected( mem_cgroup_nodeinfo(memcg, nid)->shrinker_map, true); @@ -249,7 +246,7 @@ int alloc_shrinker_maps(struct mem_cgroup *memcg) if (mem_cgroup_is_root(memcg)) return 0; - mutex_lock(&memcg_shrinker_map_mutex); + down_write(&shrinker_rwsem); size = memcg_shrinker_map_size; for_each_node(nid) { map = kvzalloc_node(sizeof(*map) + size, GFP_KERNEL, nid); @@ -260,7 +257,7 @@ int alloc_shrinker_maps(struct mem_cgroup *memcg) } rcu_assign_pointer(memcg->nodeinfo[nid]->shrinker_map, map); } - mutex_unlock(&memcg_shrinker_map_mutex); + up_write(&shrinker_rwsem); return ret; } @@ -275,9 +272,10 @@ static int expand_shrinker_maps(int new_id) if (size <= old_size) return 0; - mutex_lock(&memcg_shrinker_map_mutex); if (!root_mem_cgroup) - goto unlock; + goto out; + + lockdep_assert_held(&shrinker_rwsem); memcg = mem_cgroup_iter(NULL, NULL, NULL); do { @@ -286,13 +284,13 @@ static int expand_shrinker_maps(int new_id) ret = expand_one_shrinker_map(memcg, size, old_size); if (ret) { mem_cgroup_iter_break(NULL, memcg); - goto unlock; + goto out; } } while ((memcg = mem_cgroup_iter(NULL, memcg, NULL)) != NULL); -unlock: +out: if (!ret) memcg_shrinker_map_size = size; - mutex_unlock(&memcg_shrinker_map_mutex); + return ret; }