diff mbox series

[mm] kfence, x86: fix preemptible warning on KPTI-enabled systems

Message ID 20210330065737.652669-1-elver@google.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series [mm] kfence, x86: fix preemptible warning on KPTI-enabled systems | expand

Commit Message

Marco Elver March 30, 2021, 6:57 a.m. UTC
On systems with KPTI enabled, we can currently observe the following warning:

  BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible
  caller is invalidate_user_asid+0x13/0x50
  CPU: 6 PID: 1075 Comm: dmesg Not tainted 5.12.0-rc4-gda4a2b1a5479-kfence_1+ #1
  Hardware name: Hewlett-Packard HP Pro 3500 Series/2ABF, BIOS 8.11 10/24/2012
  Call Trace:
   dump_stack+0x7f/0xad
   check_preemption_disabled+0xc8/0xd0
   invalidate_user_asid+0x13/0x50
   flush_tlb_one_kernel+0x5/0x20
   kfence_protect+0x56/0x80
   ...

While it normally makes sense to require preemption to be off, so that
the expected CPU's TLB is flushed and not another, in our case it really
is best-effort (see comments in kfence_protect_page()).

Avoid the warning by disabling preemption around flush_tlb_one_kernel().

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/YGIDBAboELGgMgXy@elver.google.com/
Reported-by: Tomi Sarvela <tomi.p.sarvela@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/kfence.h | 7 ++++++-
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Alexander Potapenko April 1, 2021, 9:11 a.m. UTC | #1
On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 8:57 AM Marco Elver <elver@google.com> wrote:
>
> On systems with KPTI enabled, we can currently observe the following warning:
>
>   BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible
>   caller is invalidate_user_asid+0x13/0x50
>   CPU: 6 PID: 1075 Comm: dmesg Not tainted 5.12.0-rc4-gda4a2b1a5479-kfence_1+ #1
>   Hardware name: Hewlett-Packard HP Pro 3500 Series/2ABF, BIOS 8.11 10/24/2012
>   Call Trace:
>    dump_stack+0x7f/0xad
>    check_preemption_disabled+0xc8/0xd0
>    invalidate_user_asid+0x13/0x50
>    flush_tlb_one_kernel+0x5/0x20
>    kfence_protect+0x56/0x80
>    ...
>
> While it normally makes sense to require preemption to be off, so that
> the expected CPU's TLB is flushed and not another, in our case it really
> is best-effort (see comments in kfence_protect_page()).
>
> Avoid the warning by disabling preemption around flush_tlb_one_kernel().
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/YGIDBAboELGgMgXy@elver.google.com/
> Reported-by: Tomi Sarvela <tomi.p.sarvela@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Acked-by: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kfence.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kfence.h
index 97bbb4a9083a..05b48b33baf0 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kfence.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kfence.h
@@ -56,8 +56,13 @@  static inline bool kfence_protect_page(unsigned long addr, bool protect)
 	else
 		set_pte(pte, __pte(pte_val(*pte) | _PAGE_PRESENT));
 
-	/* Flush this CPU's TLB. */
+	/*
+	 * Flush this CPU's TLB, assuming whoever did the allocation/free is
+	 * likely to continue running on this CPU.
+	 */
+	preempt_disable();
 	flush_tlb_one_kernel(addr);
+	preempt_enable();
 	return true;
 }