From patchwork Tue Apr 27 20:42:59 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Yu-cheng Yu X-Patchwork-Id: 12227251 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58553C4361A for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 20:44:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4C0F60720 for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 20:44:39 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org E4C0F60720 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 2E9CE6B0081; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 16:44:17 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 277466B0082; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 16:44:17 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 0C6FC6B0083; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 16:44:16 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0142.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.142]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA0626B0081 for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 16:44:16 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin09.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay04.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9459B4417 for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 20:44:16 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 78079324512.09.31BAB3F Received: from mga04.intel.com (mga04.intel.com [192.55.52.120]) by imf28.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CEED2000261 for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 20:44:17 +0000 (UTC) IronPort-SDR: RxNb0DkcY4elo+30XqcK0sw82nDyAmo1AC2FaT2pHNPlJ9Bq21qY6PNsD2GBJiqJdaofBi8bZo 00PNsxfbQ0+w== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,9967"; a="194473676" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.82,255,1613462400"; d="scan'208";a="194473676" Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by fmsmga104.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 27 Apr 2021 13:44:15 -0700 IronPort-SDR: JTsITtzNjQfEiRw5TlsGstnNUL1WZhpobfNtlVwhnCZSpOy29dMh8GWRFxMseh4aRrZg8ajO2r 8DDrnmvmpNZA== X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.82,255,1613462400"; d="scan'208";a="465623511" Received: from yyu32-desk.sc.intel.com ([143.183.136.146]) by orsmga001-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 27 Apr 2021 13:44:14 -0700 From: Yu-cheng Yu To: x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , Andy Lutomirski , Balbir Singh , Borislav Petkov , Cyrill Gorcunov , Dave Hansen , Eugene Syromiatnikov , Florian Weimer , "H.J. Lu" , Jann Horn , Jonathan Corbet , Kees Cook , Mike Kravetz , Nadav Amit , Oleg Nesterov , Pavel Machek , Peter Zijlstra , Randy Dunlap , "Ravi V. Shankar" , Vedvyas Shanbhogue , Dave Martin , Weijiang Yang , Pengfei Xu , Haitao Huang Cc: Yu-cheng Yu , "Kirill A . Shutemov" Subject: [PATCH v26 14/30] x86/mm: Shadow Stack page fault error checking Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2021 13:42:59 -0700 Message-Id: <20210427204315.24153-15-yu-cheng.yu@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.21.0 In-Reply-To: <20210427204315.24153-1-yu-cheng.yu@intel.com> References: <20210427204315.24153-1-yu-cheng.yu@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 6CEED2000261 X-Stat-Signature: 98849zegieb63e1ffc7yux7rngg768r7 X-Rspamd-Server: rspam02 Received-SPF: none (intel.com>: No applicable sender policy available) receiver=imf28; identity=mailfrom; envelope-from=""; helo=mga04.intel.com; client-ip=192.55.52.120 X-HE-DKIM-Result: none/none X-HE-Tag: 1619556257-459528 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: Shadow stack accesses are those that are performed by the CPU where it expects to encounter a shadow stack mapping. These accesses are performed implicitly by CALL/RET at the site of the shadow stack pointer. These accesses are made explicitly by shadow stack management instructions like WRUSSQ. Shadow stacks accesses to shadow-stack mapping can see faults in normal, valid operation just like regular accesses to regular mappings. Shadow stacks need some of the same features like delayed allocation, swap and copy-on-write. Shadow stack accesses can also result in errors, such as when a shadow stack overflows, or if a shadow stack access occurs to a non-shadow-stack mapping. In handling a shadow stack page fault, verify it occurs within a shadow stack mapping. It is always an error otherwise. For valid shadow stack accesses, set FAULT_FLAG_WRITE to effect copy-on-write. Because clearing _PAGE_DIRTY (vs. _PAGE_RW) is used to trigger the fault, shadow stack read fault and shadow stack write fault are not differentiated and both are handled as a write access. Signed-off-by: Yu-cheng Yu Reviewed-by: Kees Cook Reviewed-by: Kirill A. Shutemov --- v24: - Change VM_SHSTK to VM_SHADOW_STACK. arch/x86/include/asm/trap_pf.h | 2 ++ arch/x86/mm/fault.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/trap_pf.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/trap_pf.h index 10b1de500ab1..afa524325e55 100644 --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/trap_pf.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/trap_pf.h @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ * bit 3 == 1: use of reserved bit detected * bit 4 == 1: fault was an instruction fetch * bit 5 == 1: protection keys block access + * bit 6 == 1: shadow stack access fault * bit 15 == 1: SGX MMU page-fault */ enum x86_pf_error_code { @@ -20,6 +21,7 @@ enum x86_pf_error_code { X86_PF_RSVD = 1 << 3, X86_PF_INSTR = 1 << 4, X86_PF_PK = 1 << 5, + X86_PF_SHSTK = 1 << 6, X86_PF_SGX = 1 << 15, }; diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c index a73347e2cdfc..394e504305b7 100644 --- a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c +++ b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c @@ -1100,6 +1100,17 @@ access_error(unsigned long error_code, struct vm_area_struct *vma) (error_code & X86_PF_INSTR), foreign)) return 1; + /* + * Verify a shadow stack access is within a shadow stack VMA. + * It is always an error otherwise. Normal data access to a + * shadow stack area is checked in the case followed. + */ + if (error_code & X86_PF_SHSTK) { + if (!(vma->vm_flags & VM_SHADOW_STACK)) + return 1; + return 0; + } + if (error_code & X86_PF_WRITE) { /* write, present and write, not present: */ if (unlikely(!(vma->vm_flags & VM_WRITE))) @@ -1293,6 +1304,14 @@ void do_user_addr_fault(struct pt_regs *regs, perf_sw_event(PERF_COUNT_SW_PAGE_FAULTS, 1, regs, address); + /* + * Clearing _PAGE_DIRTY is used to detect shadow stack access. + * This method cannot distinguish shadow stack read vs. write. + * For valid shadow stack accesses, set FAULT_FLAG_WRITE to effect + * copy-on-write. + */ + if (error_code & X86_PF_SHSTK) + flags |= FAULT_FLAG_WRITE; if (error_code & X86_PF_WRITE) flags |= FAULT_FLAG_WRITE; if (error_code & X86_PF_INSTR)