@@ -131,6 +131,7 @@ static void huge_pagevec_release(struct pagevec *pvec)
static int hugetlbfs_file_mmap(struct file *file, struct vm_area_struct *vma)
{
struct inode *inode = file_inode(file);
+ struct hugetlbfs_inode_info *info = HUGETLBFS_I(inode);
loff_t len, vma_len;
int ret;
struct hstate *h = hstate_file(file);
@@ -146,6 +147,10 @@ static int hugetlbfs_file_mmap(struct file *file, struct vm_area_struct *vma)
vma->vm_flags |= VM_HUGETLB | VM_DONTEXPAND;
vma->vm_ops = &hugetlb_vm_ops;
+ ret = seal_check_future_write(info->seals, vma);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
/*
* page based offset in vm_pgoff could be sufficiently large to
* overflow a loff_t when converted to byte offset. This can
@@ -3238,5 +3238,37 @@ extern int sysctl_nr_trim_pages;
void mem_dump_obj(void *object);
+/**
+ * seal_check_future_write - Check for F_SEAL_FUTURE_WRITE flag and handle it
+ * @seals: the seals to check
+ * @vma: the vma to operate on
+ *
+ * Check whether F_SEAL_FUTURE_WRITE is set; if so, do proper check/handling on
+ * the vma flags. Return 0 if check pass, or <0 for errors.
+ */
+static inline int seal_check_future_write(int seals, struct vm_area_struct *vma)
+{
+ if (seals & F_SEAL_FUTURE_WRITE) {
+ /*
+ * New PROT_WRITE and MAP_SHARED mmaps are not allowed when
+ * "future write" seal active.
+ */
+ if ((vma->vm_flags & VM_SHARED) && (vma->vm_flags & VM_WRITE))
+ return -EPERM;
+
+ /*
+ * Since an F_SEAL_FUTURE_WRITE sealed memfd can be mapped as
+ * MAP_SHARED and read-only, take care to not allow mprotect to
+ * revert protections on such mappings. Do this only for shared
+ * mappings. For private mappings, don't need to mask
+ * VM_MAYWRITE as we still want them to be COW-writable.
+ */
+ if (vma->vm_flags & VM_SHARED)
+ vma->vm_flags &= ~(VM_MAYWRITE);
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
#endif /* __KERNEL__ */
#endif /* _LINUX_MM_H */
@@ -2258,25 +2258,11 @@ int shmem_lock(struct file *file, int lock, struct user_struct *user)
static int shmem_mmap(struct file *file, struct vm_area_struct *vma)
{
struct shmem_inode_info *info = SHMEM_I(file_inode(file));
+ int ret;
- if (info->seals & F_SEAL_FUTURE_WRITE) {
- /*
- * New PROT_WRITE and MAP_SHARED mmaps are not allowed when
- * "future write" seal active.
- */
- if ((vma->vm_flags & VM_SHARED) && (vma->vm_flags & VM_WRITE))
- return -EPERM;
-
- /*
- * Since an F_SEAL_FUTURE_WRITE sealed memfd can be mapped as
- * MAP_SHARED and read-only, take care to not allow mprotect to
- * revert protections on such mappings. Do this only for shared
- * mappings. For private mappings, don't need to mask
- * VM_MAYWRITE as we still want them to be COW-writable.
- */
- if (vma->vm_flags & VM_SHARED)
- vma->vm_flags &= ~(VM_MAYWRITE);
- }
+ ret = seal_check_future_write(info->seals, vma);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
/* arm64 - allow memory tagging on RAM-based files */
vma->vm_flags |= VM_MTE_ALLOWED;
F_SEAL_FUTURE_WRITE is missing for hugetlb starting from the first day. There is a test program for that and it fails constantly. $ ./memfd_test hugetlbfs memfd-hugetlb: CREATE memfd-hugetlb: BASIC memfd-hugetlb: SEAL-WRITE memfd-hugetlb: SEAL-FUTURE-WRITE mmap() didn't fail as expected Aborted (core dumped) I think it's probably because no one is really running the hugetlbfs test. Fix it by checking FUTURE_WRITE also in hugetlbfs_file_mmap() as what we do in shmem_mmap(). Generalize a helper for that. Cc: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: ab3948f58ff84 ("mm/memfd: add an F_SEAL_FUTURE_WRITE seal to memfd") Reported-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> --- fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c | 5 +++++ include/linux/mm.h | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ mm/shmem.c | 22 ++++------------------ 3 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)