Message ID | 20211204095256.78042-5-laoar.shao@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | Phase 2 of task comm cleanups | expand |
On Sat, 4 Dec 2021 09:52:55 +0000 Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com> wrote: > @@ -43,7 +45,7 @@ static int test__perf_evsel__tp_sched_test(struct test_suite *test __maybe_unuse > return -1; > } > > - if (evsel__test_field(evsel, "prev_comm", 16, false)) > + if (evsel__test_field(evsel, "prev_comm", TASK_COMM_LEN, false)) > ret = -1; > > if (evsel__test_field(evsel, "prev_pid", 4, true)) > @@ -55,7 +57,7 @@ static int test__perf_evsel__tp_sched_test(struct test_suite *test __maybe_unuse > if (evsel__test_field(evsel, "prev_state", sizeof(long), true)) > ret = -1; > > - if (evsel__test_field(evsel, "next_comm", 16, false)) > + if (evsel__test_field(evsel, "next_comm", TASK_COMM_LEN, false)) > ret = -1; > > if (evsel__test_field(evsel, "next_pid", 4, true)) > @@ -73,7 +75,7 @@ static int test__perf_evsel__tp_sched_test(struct test_suite *test __maybe_unuse > return -1; > } > > - if (evsel__test_field(evsel, "comm", 16, false)) > + if (evsel__test_field(evsel, "comm", TASK_COMM_LEN, false)) Shouldn't all these be TASK_COMM_LEN_16? -- Steve > ret = -1; > > if (evsel__test_field(evsel, "pid", 4, true))
On Thu, Dec 9, 2021 at 2:43 AM Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote: > > On Sat, 4 Dec 2021 09:52:55 +0000 > Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com> wrote: > > > @@ -43,7 +45,7 @@ static int test__perf_evsel__tp_sched_test(struct test_suite *test __maybe_unuse > > return -1; > > } > > > > - if (evsel__test_field(evsel, "prev_comm", 16, false)) > > + if (evsel__test_field(evsel, "prev_comm", TASK_COMM_LEN, false)) > > ret = -1; > > > > if (evsel__test_field(evsel, "prev_pid", 4, true)) > > @@ -55,7 +57,7 @@ static int test__perf_evsel__tp_sched_test(struct test_suite *test __maybe_unuse > > if (evsel__test_field(evsel, "prev_state", sizeof(long), true)) > > ret = -1; > > > > - if (evsel__test_field(evsel, "next_comm", 16, false)) > > + if (evsel__test_field(evsel, "next_comm", TASK_COMM_LEN, false)) > > ret = -1; > > > > if (evsel__test_field(evsel, "next_pid", 4, true)) > > @@ -73,7 +75,7 @@ static int test__perf_evsel__tp_sched_test(struct test_suite *test __maybe_unuse > > return -1; > > } > > > > - if (evsel__test_field(evsel, "comm", 16, false)) > > + if (evsel__test_field(evsel, "comm", TASK_COMM_LEN, false)) > > Shouldn't all these be TASK_COMM_LEN_16? > The value here must be the same with TASK_COMM_LEN, so I use TASK_COMM_LEN here. But we may also change the code as https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20211101060419.4682-9-laoar.shao@gmail.com/ if TASK_COMM_LEN is changed, so TASK_COMM_LEN_16 is also okay here. I will change it to TASK_COMM_LEN_16 in the next version. > > > ret = -1; > > > > if (evsel__test_field(evsel, "pid", 4, true)) >
diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/evsel-tp-sched.c b/tools/perf/tests/evsel-tp-sched.c index cf4da3d748c2..83e0ce2e676f 100644 --- a/tools/perf/tests/evsel-tp-sched.c +++ b/tools/perf/tests/evsel-tp-sched.c @@ -5,6 +5,8 @@ #include "tests.h" #include "debug.h" +#define TASK_COMM_LEN 16 + static int evsel__test_field(struct evsel *evsel, const char *name, int size, bool should_be_signed) { struct tep_format_field *field = evsel__field(evsel, name); @@ -43,7 +45,7 @@ static int test__perf_evsel__tp_sched_test(struct test_suite *test __maybe_unuse return -1; } - if (evsel__test_field(evsel, "prev_comm", 16, false)) + if (evsel__test_field(evsel, "prev_comm", TASK_COMM_LEN, false)) ret = -1; if (evsel__test_field(evsel, "prev_pid", 4, true)) @@ -55,7 +57,7 @@ static int test__perf_evsel__tp_sched_test(struct test_suite *test __maybe_unuse if (evsel__test_field(evsel, "prev_state", sizeof(long), true)) ret = -1; - if (evsel__test_field(evsel, "next_comm", 16, false)) + if (evsel__test_field(evsel, "next_comm", TASK_COMM_LEN, false)) ret = -1; if (evsel__test_field(evsel, "next_pid", 4, true)) @@ -73,7 +75,7 @@ static int test__perf_evsel__tp_sched_test(struct test_suite *test __maybe_unuse return -1; } - if (evsel__test_field(evsel, "comm", 16, false)) + if (evsel__test_field(evsel, "comm", TASK_COMM_LEN, false)) ret = -1; if (evsel__test_field(evsel, "pid", 4, true))
evsel-tp-sched will verify the task comm len in sched:sched_switch and sched:sched_wakeup tracepoints. The len must be same with TASK_COMM_LEN defined in linux/sched.h. In order to make it grepable, we'd better replace the hard-coded 16 with TASK_COMM_LEN. Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com> Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <arnaldo.melo@gmail.com> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com> Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com> Cc: Michal Miroslaw <mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> --- tools/perf/tests/evsel-tp-sched.c | 8 +++++--- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)