Message ID | 20220110042406.499429-14-willy@infradead.org (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | Convert GUP to folios | expand |
On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 04:23:51AM +0000, Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) wrote: > +static inline atomic_t *folio_pincount_ptr(struct folio *folio) > +{ > + struct page *tail = &folio->page + 1; > + return &tail->compound_pincount; > +} And empty line after the declaration would be nice here. Otherwise looks good: Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
On 1/9/22 20:23, Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) wrote: > This is the folio equivalent of compound_pincount_ptr(). > > Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> > --- > include/linux/mm_types.h | 6 ++++++ > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/include/linux/mm_types.h b/include/linux/mm_types.h > index 60e4595eaf63..34c7114ea9e9 100644 > --- a/include/linux/mm_types.h > +++ b/include/linux/mm_types.h > @@ -312,6 +312,12 @@ static inline atomic_t *compound_mapcount_ptr(struct page *page) > return &page[1].compound_mapcount; > } > > +static inline atomic_t *folio_pincount_ptr(struct folio *folio) > +{ > + struct page *tail = &folio->page + 1; > + return &tail->compound_pincount; > +} > + Should we make this code (the various folio map/pin count inline functions) more uniform? I see that you prefer "+1" over page[1], sure, but having a mix seems like it's trying to call out a difference for which the reader would search in vain. :) After the whole series is applied, this area ends up with a 50/50 mix of the two. Or am I overlooking something, and they really *should* look different? Just a very minor point, so either way, Reviewed-by: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com> thanks,
diff --git a/include/linux/mm_types.h b/include/linux/mm_types.h index 60e4595eaf63..34c7114ea9e9 100644 --- a/include/linux/mm_types.h +++ b/include/linux/mm_types.h @@ -312,6 +312,12 @@ static inline atomic_t *compound_mapcount_ptr(struct page *page) return &page[1].compound_mapcount; } +static inline atomic_t *folio_pincount_ptr(struct folio *folio) +{ + struct page *tail = &folio->page + 1; + return &tail->compound_pincount; +} + static inline atomic_t *compound_pincount_ptr(struct page *page) { return &page[1].compound_pincount;
This is the folio equivalent of compound_pincount_ptr(). Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> --- include/linux/mm_types.h | 6 ++++++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)