From patchwork Fri Feb 11 16:41:30 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Zi Yan X-Patchwork-Id: 12743657 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CDB4C4321E for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2022 16:41:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id B0F3E6B007B; Fri, 11 Feb 2022 11:41:47 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id ABF636B007D; Fri, 11 Feb 2022 11:41:47 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 9115C6B007E; Fri, 11 Feb 2022 11:41:47 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (relay.a.hostedemail.com [64.99.140.24]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 778E56B007B for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2022 11:41:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin02.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay10.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BAA914BE for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2022 16:41:47 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 79131065454.02.36DCD49 Received: from new1-smtp.messagingengine.com (new1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.221]) by imf14.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6699100006 for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2022 16:41:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailnew.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D48B580370; Fri, 11 Feb 2022 11:41:46 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 11 Feb 2022 11:41:46 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sent.com; h=cc :cc:content-transfer-encoding:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm2; bh=VmPT36pm2xq5yd UOBiaL9nltkdkN6llWorno9T9IDyQ=; b=gjNNte4q1d4v+zBAgXRrePdkoW1H4l cp4SLrXaD7/hBHSQU+GTtrSHPrtTpLWBXU0iho6p/fgEzTzkh4Z4iMVfjk16lutA 5j9Hlazcih/ZKI3nvorGmS6ywhZFxBY3EkTbzvXGHtm35zCqe5MBFxzAOHqdLipC kre5T75+9ymWOBNVxEk5uGfafdFEjt9Hri/ZSetb/zQ0a+s5YWqVS21UAPXRo1Dh n6wNHhapury/lMghBN1A/cBrBVz4tCvR7cZGEoeLzce9amd9WETozw8EUfUcjdbc AkTU2QdV649URYhhIkuycO+oDOFp9Vs7r37uPZSR62NJXuCOPWJNXO/A== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding:date:date :from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to :x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm2; bh=VmPT36pm2xq5ydUOBiaL9nltkdkN6llWorno9T9IDyQ=; b=FSsiyz6A EPX4XaXrPUTS1uBVvUOpncx1QpHqeEl4ibTl6B2K2plQPADaWCy+rnMKMLzQY41X gDNl78Vhk9G9RmlFGDo08XEGRFcNktJYTaPNLTnDzcZx3hViFgd/gt1X1BX9PT2h iFc86lsB+ALlm9mCOa5Q9fiPJd4UzIEF9LrANIFJRhhYbok1RdtbdJWi0SeclhXq BHaFSKwUYR5bFy1Fxbd08NwTC6sOYGEz5k7UwvBFPnHf4WIPsBUrTePZsNK/Idj+ I123q92IRISyVAKQEkQ/p3JYwhifNHYBczl8jbI8Gi+TSbJ1K0n+72jm/fJ74uEi 9nt0DkgT7IIQQA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvvddrieefgdeltdcutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefhvffufffkofgjfhhrggfgsedtqhertdertddtnecuhfhrohhmpegkihcujggr nhcuoeiiihdrhigrnhesshgvnhhtrdgtohhmqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeeijeeuvd euudeuhfeghfehieeuvdetvdeugfeigeevteeuieeuhedtgeduheefleenucevlhhushht vghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpeiiihdrhigrnhesshgvnh htrdgtohhm X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Fri, 11 Feb 2022 11:41:45 -0500 (EST) From: Zi Yan To: David Hildenbrand , linux-mm@kvack.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Michael Ellerman , Christoph Hellwig , Marek Szyprowski , Robin Murphy , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, Vlastimil Babka , Mel Gorman , Eric Ren , Mike Rapoport , Oscar Salvador , Zi Yan Subject: [PATCH v5 1/6] mm: page_isolation: move has_unmovable_pages() to mm/page_isolation.c Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2022 11:41:30 -0500 Message-Id: <20220211164135.1803616-2-zi.yan@sent.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <20220211164135.1803616-1-zi.yan@sent.com> References: <20220211164135.1803616-1-zi.yan@sent.com> Reply-To: Zi Yan MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Rspam-User: X-Rspamd-Server: rspam04 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: A6699100006 X-Stat-Signature: tqjbooyjjfsc8z1we8n7cu5hyohsyxue Authentication-Results: imf14.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=sent.com header.s=fm2 header.b=gjNNte4q; dkim=pass header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm2 header.b=FSsiyz6A; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=sent.com; spf=pass (imf14.hostedemail.com: domain of zi.yan@sent.com designates 66.111.4.221 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=zi.yan@sent.com X-HE-Tag: 1644597706-190261 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: From: Zi Yan has_unmovable_pages() is only used in mm/page_isolation.c. Move it from mm/page_alloc.c and make it static. Signed-off-by: Zi Yan Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador Reviewed-by: Mike Rapoport --- include/linux/page-isolation.h | 2 - mm/page_alloc.c | 119 --------------------------------- mm/page_isolation.c | 119 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 119 insertions(+), 121 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/page-isolation.h b/include/linux/page-isolation.h index 572458016331..e14eddf6741a 100644 --- a/include/linux/page-isolation.h +++ b/include/linux/page-isolation.h @@ -33,8 +33,6 @@ static inline bool is_migrate_isolate(int migratetype) #define MEMORY_OFFLINE 0x1 #define REPORT_FAILURE 0x2 -struct page *has_unmovable_pages(struct zone *zone, struct page *page, - int migratetype, int flags); void set_pageblock_migratetype(struct page *page, int migratetype); int move_freepages_block(struct zone *zone, struct page *page, int migratetype, int *num_movable); diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c index cface1d38093..e2c6a67fc386 100644 --- a/mm/page_alloc.c +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c @@ -8962,125 +8962,6 @@ void *__init alloc_large_system_hash(const char *tablename, return table; } -/* - * This function checks whether pageblock includes unmovable pages or not. - * - * PageLRU check without isolation or lru_lock could race so that - * MIGRATE_MOVABLE block might include unmovable pages. And __PageMovable - * check without lock_page also may miss some movable non-lru pages at - * race condition. So you can't expect this function should be exact. - * - * Returns a page without holding a reference. If the caller wants to - * dereference that page (e.g., dumping), it has to make sure that it - * cannot get removed (e.g., via memory unplug) concurrently. - * - */ -struct page *has_unmovable_pages(struct zone *zone, struct page *page, - int migratetype, int flags) -{ - unsigned long iter = 0; - unsigned long pfn = page_to_pfn(page); - unsigned long offset = pfn % pageblock_nr_pages; - - if (is_migrate_cma_page(page)) { - /* - * CMA allocations (alloc_contig_range) really need to mark - * isolate CMA pageblocks even when they are not movable in fact - * so consider them movable here. - */ - if (is_migrate_cma(migratetype)) - return NULL; - - return page; - } - - for (; iter < pageblock_nr_pages - offset; iter++) { - page = pfn_to_page(pfn + iter); - - /* - * Both, bootmem allocations and memory holes are marked - * PG_reserved and are unmovable. We can even have unmovable - * allocations inside ZONE_MOVABLE, for example when - * specifying "movablecore". - */ - if (PageReserved(page)) - return page; - - /* - * If the zone is movable and we have ruled out all reserved - * pages then it should be reasonably safe to assume the rest - * is movable. - */ - if (zone_idx(zone) == ZONE_MOVABLE) - continue; - - /* - * Hugepages are not in LRU lists, but they're movable. - * THPs are on the LRU, but need to be counted as #small pages. - * We need not scan over tail pages because we don't - * handle each tail page individually in migration. - */ - if (PageHuge(page) || PageTransCompound(page)) { - struct page *head = compound_head(page); - unsigned int skip_pages; - - if (PageHuge(page)) { - if (!hugepage_migration_supported(page_hstate(head))) - return page; - } else if (!PageLRU(head) && !__PageMovable(head)) { - return page; - } - - skip_pages = compound_nr(head) - (page - head); - iter += skip_pages - 1; - continue; - } - - /* - * We can't use page_count without pin a page - * because another CPU can free compound page. - * This check already skips compound tails of THP - * because their page->_refcount is zero at all time. - */ - if (!page_ref_count(page)) { - if (PageBuddy(page)) - iter += (1 << buddy_order(page)) - 1; - continue; - } - - /* - * The HWPoisoned page may be not in buddy system, and - * page_count() is not 0. - */ - if ((flags & MEMORY_OFFLINE) && PageHWPoison(page)) - continue; - - /* - * We treat all PageOffline() pages as movable when offlining - * to give drivers a chance to decrement their reference count - * in MEM_GOING_OFFLINE in order to indicate that these pages - * can be offlined as there are no direct references anymore. - * For actually unmovable PageOffline() where the driver does - * not support this, we will fail later when trying to actually - * move these pages that still have a reference count > 0. - * (false negatives in this function only) - */ - if ((flags & MEMORY_OFFLINE) && PageOffline(page)) - continue; - - if (__PageMovable(page) || PageLRU(page)) - continue; - - /* - * If there are RECLAIMABLE pages, we need to check - * it. But now, memory offline itself doesn't call - * shrink_node_slabs() and it still to be fixed. - */ - return page; - } - return NULL; -} - #ifdef CONFIG_CONTIG_ALLOC static unsigned long pfn_max_align_down(unsigned long pfn) { diff --git a/mm/page_isolation.c b/mm/page_isolation.c index f67c4c70f17f..b34f1310aeaa 100644 --- a/mm/page_isolation.c +++ b/mm/page_isolation.c @@ -15,6 +15,125 @@ #define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS #include +/* + * This function checks whether pageblock includes unmovable pages or not. + * + * PageLRU check without isolation or lru_lock could race so that + * MIGRATE_MOVABLE block might include unmovable pages. And __PageMovable + * check without lock_page also may miss some movable non-lru pages at + * race condition. So you can't expect this function should be exact. + * + * Returns a page without holding a reference. If the caller wants to + * dereference that page (e.g., dumping), it has to make sure that it + * cannot get removed (e.g., via memory unplug) concurrently. + * + */ +static struct page *has_unmovable_pages(struct zone *zone, struct page *page, + int migratetype, int flags) +{ + unsigned long iter = 0; + unsigned long pfn = page_to_pfn(page); + unsigned long offset = pfn % pageblock_nr_pages; + + if (is_migrate_cma_page(page)) { + /* + * CMA allocations (alloc_contig_range) really need to mark + * isolate CMA pageblocks even when they are not movable in fact + * so consider them movable here. + */ + if (is_migrate_cma(migratetype)) + return NULL; + + return page; + } + + for (; iter < pageblock_nr_pages - offset; iter++) { + page = pfn_to_page(pfn + iter); + + /* + * Both, bootmem allocations and memory holes are marked + * PG_reserved and are unmovable. We can even have unmovable + * allocations inside ZONE_MOVABLE, for example when + * specifying "movablecore". + */ + if (PageReserved(page)) + return page; + + /* + * If the zone is movable and we have ruled out all reserved + * pages then it should be reasonably safe to assume the rest + * is movable. + */ + if (zone_idx(zone) == ZONE_MOVABLE) + continue; + + /* + * Hugepages are not in LRU lists, but they're movable. + * THPs are on the LRU, but need to be counted as #small pages. + * We need not scan over tail pages because we don't + * handle each tail page individually in migration. + */ + if (PageHuge(page) || PageTransCompound(page)) { + struct page *head = compound_head(page); + unsigned int skip_pages; + + if (PageHuge(page)) { + if (!hugepage_migration_supported(page_hstate(head))) + return page; + } else if (!PageLRU(head) && !__PageMovable(head)) { + return page; + } + + skip_pages = compound_nr(head) - (page - head); + iter += skip_pages - 1; + continue; + } + + /* + * We can't use page_count without pin a page + * because another CPU can free compound page. + * This check already skips compound tails of THP + * because their page->_refcount is zero at all time. + */ + if (!page_ref_count(page)) { + if (PageBuddy(page)) + iter += (1 << buddy_order(page)) - 1; + continue; + } + + /* + * The HWPoisoned page may be not in buddy system, and + * page_count() is not 0. + */ + if ((flags & MEMORY_OFFLINE) && PageHWPoison(page)) + continue; + + /* + * We treat all PageOffline() pages as movable when offlining + * to give drivers a chance to decrement their reference count + * in MEM_GOING_OFFLINE in order to indicate that these pages + * can be offlined as there are no direct references anymore. + * For actually unmovable PageOffline() where the driver does + * not support this, we will fail later when trying to actually + * move these pages that still have a reference count > 0. + * (false negatives in this function only) + */ + if ((flags & MEMORY_OFFLINE) && PageOffline(page)) + continue; + + if (__PageMovable(page) || PageLRU(page)) + continue; + + /* + * If there are RECLAIMABLE pages, we need to check + * it. But now, memory offline itself doesn't call + * shrink_node_slabs() and it still to be fixed. + */ + return page; + } + return NULL; +} + static int set_migratetype_isolate(struct page *page, int migratetype, int isol_flags) { struct zone *zone = page_zone(page);