@@ -201,7 +201,7 @@ config ARM64
select HAVE_FUNCTION_ARG_ACCESS_API
select MMU_GATHER_RCU_TABLE_FREE
select HAVE_RSEQ
- select HAVE_SHADOW_STACKTRACE
+ select HAVE_SHADOW_STACKTRACE if CONFIG_SHADOW_CALL_STACK
select HAVE_STACKPROTECTOR
select HAVE_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINTS
select HAVE_KPROBES
@@ -213,6 +213,8 @@ noinline notrace void arch_stack_walk(stack_trace_consume_fn consume_entry,
walk_stackframe(task, &frame, consume_entry, cookie);
}
+#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_SHADOW_STACKTRACE
+
static const struct {
unsigned long ** __percpu saved;
unsigned long ** __percpu base;
@@ -293,3 +295,5 @@ noinline notrace int arch_stack_walk_shadow(unsigned long *store,
preempt_enable();
return len;
}
+
+#endif /* CONFIG_HAVE_SHADOW_STACKTRACE */
The arm64 implementation of arch_stack_walk_shadow(), which is introduced by commit 8cdc580c5ca2 ("arm64: implement stack_trace_save_shadow") of -mm, uses task_scs(), which depends on SHADOW_CALL_STACK, but arm64 Kconfig unconditionally sets HAVE_SHADOW_STACKTRACE. As a result, below build error happens when SHADOW_CALL_STACK is unset. /linux/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c: In function 'arch_stack_walk_shadow': /linux/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c:289:13: error: implicit declaration of function 'task_scs'; did you mean 'task_lock'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] 289 | scs_base = task_scs(current); | ^~~~~~~~ | task_lock This commit fixes the error by making HAVE_SHADOW_STACKTRACE depends on SHADOW_CALL_STACK and impelmentation of arch_stack_walk_shadow() depends on HAVE_SHADOW_STACKTRACE. Fixes: 8cdc580c5ca2 ("arm64: implement stack_trace_save_shadow") of -mm Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org> --- arch/arm64/Kconfig | 2 +- arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c | 4 ++++ 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)