| Message ID | 20220408071222.219689-2-ying.huang@intel.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
| Series | memory tiering: hot page selection | expand |
On Fri, Apr 08, 2022 at 03:12:20PM +0800, Huang Ying wrote: > To optimize page placement in a memory tiering system with NUMA > balancing, the hot pages in the slow memory node need to be > identified. Essentially, the original NUMA balancing implementation > selects the mostly recently accessed (MRU) pages as the hot pages. > But this isn't a very good algorithm to identify the hot pages. > > So, in this patch we implemented a better hot page selection > algorithm. Which is based on NUMA balancing page table scanning and > hint page fault as follows, > > - When the page tables of the processes are scanned to change PTE/PMD > to be PROT_NONE, the current time is recorded in struct page as scan > time. > > - When the page is accessed, hint page fault will occur. The scan > time is gotten from the struct page. And The hint page fault > latency is defined as > > hint page fault time - scan time > > The shorter the hint page fault latency of a page is, the higher the > probability of their access frequency to be higher. So the hint page > fault latency is a good estimation of the page hot/cold. > > But it's hard to find some extra space in struct page to hold the scan > time. Fortunately, we can reuse some bits used by the original NUMA > balancing. > > NUMA balancing uses some bits in struct page to store the page > accessing CPU and PID (referring to page_cpupid_xchg_last()). Which > is used by the multi-stage node selection algorithm to avoid to > migrate pages shared accessed by the NUMA nodes back and forth. But > for pages in the slow memory node, even if they are shared accessed by > multiple NUMA nodes, as long as the pages are hot, they need to be > promoted to the fast memory node. So the accessing CPU and PID > information are unnecessary for the slow memory pages. We can reuse > these bits in struct page to record the scan time for them. For the > fast memory pages, these bits are used as before. > > For the hot threshold, the default value is 1 second, which works well > in our performance test. All pages with hint page fault latency < the > threshold will be considered hot. A debugfs interface is also > provided to adjust the hot threshold. > > The downside of the above method is that the response time to the > workload hot spot changing may be much longer. For example, > > - A previous cold memory area becomes hot > > - The hint page fault will be triggered. But the hint page fault > latency isn't shorter than the hot threshold. So the pages will > not be promoted. > > - When the memory area is scanned again, maybe after a scan period, > the hint page fault latency measured will be shorter than the hot > threshold and the pages will be promoted. > > To mitigate this, > > - If there are enough free space in the fast memory node, the hot > threshold will not be used, all pages will be promoted upon the hint > page fault for fast response. > > - If fast response is more important for system performance, the > administrator can set a higher hot threshold. > > Thanks Zhong Jiang reported and tested the fix for a bug when > disabling memory tiering mode dynamically. > > Signed-off-by: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com> > Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> > Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> > Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com> > Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> > Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> > Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> > Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com> > Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com> > Cc: Wei Xu <weixugc@google.com> > Cc: osalvador <osalvador@suse.de> > Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> > Cc: Zhong Jiang <zhongjiang-ali@linux.alibaba.com> > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org > --- > include/linux/mm.h | 30 ++++++++++++++++++ > kernel/sched/debug.c | 1 + > kernel/sched/fair.c | 74 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > kernel/sched/sched.h | 1 + > mm/huge_memory.c | 13 ++++++-- > mm/memory.c | 11 ++++++- > mm/migrate.c | 12 +++++++ > mm/mprotect.c | 8 ++++- > 8 files changed, 145 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h > index e34edb775334..455a3d0e699d 100644 > --- a/include/linux/mm.h > +++ b/include/linux/mm.h > @@ -1311,6 +1311,18 @@ static inline int folio_nid(const struct folio *folio) > } > > #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING > +/* page access time bits needs to hold at least 4 seconds */ > +#define PAGE_ACCESS_TIME_MIN_BITS 12 > +#if LAST_CPUPID_SHIFT < PAGE_ACCESS_TIME_MIN_BITS > +#define PAGE_ACCESS_TIME_BUCKETS \ > + (PAGE_ACCESS_TIME_MIN_BITS - LAST_CPUPID_SHIFT) > +#else > +#define PAGE_ACCESS_TIME_BUCKETS 0 > +#endif > + > +#define PAGE_ACCESS_TIME_MASK \ > + (LAST_CPUPID_MASK << PAGE_ACCESS_TIME_BUCKETS) > + > static inline int cpu_pid_to_cpupid(int cpu, int pid) > { > return ((cpu & LAST__CPU_MASK) << LAST__PID_SHIFT) | (pid & LAST__PID_MASK); > @@ -1346,6 +1358,11 @@ static inline bool __cpupid_match_pid(pid_t task_pid, int cpupid) > return (task_pid & LAST__PID_MASK) == cpupid_to_pid(cpupid); > } > > +static inline bool check_cpupid(int cpupid) > +{ > + return cpupid_to_cpu(cpupid) < nr_cpu_ids; > +} > + > #define cpupid_match_pid(task, cpupid) __cpupid_match_pid(task->pid, cpupid) > #ifdef LAST_CPUPID_NOT_IN_PAGE_FLAGS > static inline int page_cpupid_xchg_last(struct page *page, int cpupid) > @@ -1374,12 +1391,25 @@ static inline void page_cpupid_reset_last(struct page *page) > page->flags |= LAST_CPUPID_MASK << LAST_CPUPID_PGSHIFT; > } > #endif /* LAST_CPUPID_NOT_IN_PAGE_FLAGS */ > + > +static inline int xchg_page_access_time(struct page *page, int time) > +{ > + int last_time; > + > + last_time = page_cpupid_xchg_last(page, time >> PAGE_ACCESS_TIME_BUCKETS); > + return last_time << PAGE_ACCESS_TIME_BUCKETS; > +} > #else /* !CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING */ > static inline int page_cpupid_xchg_last(struct page *page, int cpupid) > { > return page_to_nid(page); /* XXX */ > } > > +static inline int xchg_page_access_time(struct page *page, int time) > +{ > + return 0; > +} > + > static inline int page_cpupid_last(struct page *page) > { > return page_to_nid(page); /* XXX */ > diff --git a/kernel/sched/debug.c b/kernel/sched/debug.c > index bb3d63bdf4ae..ad63dbfc54f1 100644 > --- a/kernel/sched/debug.c > +++ b/kernel/sched/debug.c > @@ -333,6 +333,7 @@ static __init int sched_init_debug(void) > debugfs_create_u32("scan_period_min_ms", 0644, numa, &sysctl_numa_balancing_scan_period_min); > debugfs_create_u32("scan_period_max_ms", 0644, numa, &sysctl_numa_balancing_scan_period_max); > debugfs_create_u32("scan_size_mb", 0644, numa, &sysctl_numa_balancing_scan_size); > + debugfs_create_u32("hot_threshold_ms", 0644, numa, &sysctl_numa_balancing_hot_threshold); > #endif > > debugfs_create_file("debug", 0444, debugfs_sched, NULL, &sched_debug_fops); > diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c > index d4bd299d67ab..cb130ea46c71 100644 > --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c > +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c > @@ -1058,6 +1058,9 @@ unsigned int sysctl_numa_balancing_scan_size = 256; > /* Scan @scan_size MB every @scan_period after an initial @scan_delay in ms */ > unsigned int sysctl_numa_balancing_scan_delay = 1000; > > +/* The page with hint page fault latency < threshold in ms is considered hot */ > +unsigned int sysctl_numa_balancing_hot_threshold = 1000; > + > struct numa_group { > refcount_t refcount; > > @@ -1400,6 +1403,37 @@ static inline unsigned long group_weight(struct task_struct *p, int nid, > return 1000 * faults / total_faults; > } > > +static bool pgdat_free_space_enough(struct pglist_data *pgdat) > +{ > + int z; > + unsigned long enough_mark; > + > + enough_mark = max(1UL * 1024 * 1024 * 1024 >> PAGE_SHIFT, > + pgdat->node_present_pages >> 4); > + for (z = pgdat->nr_zones - 1; z >= 0; z--) { > + struct zone *zone = pgdat->node_zones + z; > + > + if (!populated_zone(zone)) > + continue; > + > + if (zone_watermark_ok(zone, 0, > + high_wmark_pages(zone) + enough_mark, > + ZONE_MOVABLE, 0)) > + return true; > + } > + return false; > +} > + > +static int numa_hint_fault_latency(struct page *page) > +{ > + int last_time, time; > + > + time = jiffies_to_msecs(jiffies); > + last_time = xchg_page_access_time(page, time); > + > + return (time - last_time) & PAGE_ACCESS_TIME_MASK; This code can possibly consider cold page as hot, Assume, LAST_CPUPID_SHIFT = 12 PAGE_ACCESS_TIME_BUCKETS = 0 sysctl_numa_balancing_hot_threshold = 1000 Assume while changing pte, jiffies_to_msecs(jiffies) = 0xAABB0100 So value saved in page->flags will be lowest 12 bits of 0xAABB0100 which is 0x100. Assume when numa_hint_fault_latency() gets called, time = jiffies_to_msecs(jiffies) = 0xAACC0100 So, time = 0xAACC0100, and last_time = 0x100, time - last_time = 0xAACC0100 - 0x100 = 0xAACC0000 0xAACC0000 & PAGE_ACCESS_TIME_MASK = 0xAACC0000 & ((1 << 12) - 1) = 0 so the return value of this function is 0, the code will consider it as hot page but it is cold page because actual difference is 0xAACC0100 - 0xAABB0100 = 110000 ms There may be more such scenarios. What do you think? > +} > + > bool should_numa_migrate_memory(struct task_struct *p, struct page * page, > int src_nid, int dst_cpu) > { > @@ -1407,9 +1441,38 @@ bool should_numa_migrate_memory(struct task_struct *p, struct page * page, > int dst_nid = cpu_to_node(dst_cpu); > int last_cpupid, this_cpupid; > > + /* > + * The pages in slow memory node should be migrated according > + * to hot/cold instead of accessing CPU node. > + */ > + if (sysctl_numa_balancing_mode & NUMA_BALANCING_MEMORY_TIERING && > + !node_is_toptier(src_nid)) { > + struct pglist_data *pgdat; > + unsigned long latency, th; > + > + pgdat = NODE_DATA(dst_nid); > + if (pgdat_free_space_enough(pgdat)) > + return true; > + > + th = sysctl_numa_balancing_hot_threshold; > + latency = numa_hint_fault_latency(page); > + if (latency >= th) > + return false; > + > + return true; > + } > + > this_cpupid = cpu_pid_to_cpupid(dst_cpu, current->pid); > last_cpupid = page_cpupid_xchg_last(page, this_cpupid); > > + /* > + * The cpupid may be invalid when NUMA_BALANCING_MEMORY_TIERING > + * is disabled dynamically. > + */ > + if (!(sysctl_numa_balancing_mode & NUMA_BALANCING_MEMORY_TIERING) && > + !node_is_toptier(src_nid) && !check_cpupid(last_cpupid)) > + return false; > + > /* > * Allow first faults or private faults to migrate immediately early in > * the lifetime of a task. The magic number 4 is based on waiting for > @@ -2642,6 +2705,17 @@ void task_numa_fault(int last_cpupid, int mem_node, int pages, int flags) > if (!p->mm) > return; > > + /* > + * NUMA faults statistics are unnecessary for the slow memory node. > + * > + * And, the cpupid may be invalid when NUMA_BALANCING_MEMORY_TIERING > + * is disabled dynamically. > + */ > + if (!node_is_toptier(mem_node) && > + (sysctl_numa_balancing_mode & NUMA_BALANCING_MEMORY_TIERING || > + !check_cpupid(last_cpupid))) > + return; > + > /* Allocate buffer to track faults on a per-node basis */ > if (unlikely(!p->numa_faults)) { > int size = sizeof(*p->numa_faults) * > diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h > index 58263f90c559..86ce60d3d472 100644 > --- a/kernel/sched/sched.h > +++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h > @@ -2408,6 +2408,7 @@ extern unsigned int sysctl_numa_balancing_scan_delay; > extern unsigned int sysctl_numa_balancing_scan_period_min; > extern unsigned int sysctl_numa_balancing_scan_period_max; > extern unsigned int sysctl_numa_balancing_scan_size; > +extern unsigned int sysctl_numa_balancing_hot_threshold; > #endif > > #ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_HRTICK > diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c > index 2fe38212e07c..3a715eeeebb5 100644 > --- a/mm/huge_memory.c > +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c > @@ -1401,7 +1401,7 @@ vm_fault_t do_huge_pmd_numa_page(struct vm_fault *vmf) > struct page *page; > unsigned long haddr = vmf->address & HPAGE_PMD_MASK; > int page_nid = NUMA_NO_NODE; > - int target_nid, last_cpupid = -1; > + int target_nid, last_cpupid = (-1 & LAST_CPUPID_MASK); > bool migrated = false; > bool was_writable = pmd_savedwrite(oldpmd); > int flags = 0; > @@ -1422,7 +1422,8 @@ vm_fault_t do_huge_pmd_numa_page(struct vm_fault *vmf) > flags |= TNF_NO_GROUP; > > page_nid = page_to_nid(page); > - last_cpupid = page_cpupid_last(page); > + if (node_is_toptier(page_nid)) > + last_cpupid = page_cpupid_last(page); > target_nid = numa_migrate_prep(page, vma, haddr, page_nid, > &flags); > > @@ -1740,6 +1741,7 @@ int change_huge_pmd(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pmd_t *pmd, > > if (prot_numa) { > struct page *page; > + bool toptier; > /* > * Avoid trapping faults against the zero page. The read-only > * data is likely to be read-cached on the local CPU and > @@ -1752,13 +1754,18 @@ int change_huge_pmd(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pmd_t *pmd, > goto unlock; > > page = pmd_page(*pmd); > + toptier = node_is_toptier(page_to_nid(page)); > /* > * Skip scanning top tier node if normal numa > * balancing is disabled > */ > if (!(sysctl_numa_balancing_mode & NUMA_BALANCING_NORMAL) && > - node_is_toptier(page_to_nid(page))) > + toptier) > goto unlock; > + > + if (sysctl_numa_balancing_mode & NUMA_BALANCING_MEMORY_TIERING && > + !toptier) > + xchg_page_access_time(page, jiffies_to_msecs(jiffies)); > } > /* > * In case prot_numa, we are under mmap_read_lock(mm). It's critical > diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c > index b370ed118767..a8ac15ce7a75 100644 > --- a/mm/memory.c > +++ b/mm/memory.c > @@ -74,6 +74,7 @@ > #include <linux/perf_event.h> > #include <linux/ptrace.h> > #include <linux/vmalloc.h> > +#include <linux/sched/sysctl.h> > > #include <trace/events/kmem.h> > > @@ -4455,8 +4456,16 @@ static vm_fault_t do_numa_page(struct vm_fault *vmf) > if (page_mapcount(page) > 1 && (vma->vm_flags & VM_SHARED)) > flags |= TNF_SHARED; > > - last_cpupid = page_cpupid_last(page); > page_nid = page_to_nid(page); > + /* > + * In memory tiering mode, cpupid of slow memory page is used > + * to record page access time. So use default value. > + */ > + if ((sysctl_numa_balancing_mode & NUMA_BALANCING_MEMORY_TIERING) && > + !node_is_toptier(page_nid)) > + last_cpupid = (-1 & LAST_CPUPID_MASK); > + else > + last_cpupid = page_cpupid_last(page); > target_nid = numa_migrate_prep(page, vma, vmf->address, page_nid, > &flags); > if (target_nid == NUMA_NO_NODE) { > diff --git a/mm/migrate.c b/mm/migrate.c > index dc84edfae842..e73f26dfeb38 100644 > --- a/mm/migrate.c > +++ b/mm/migrate.c > @@ -534,6 +534,18 @@ void folio_migrate_flags(struct folio *newfolio, struct folio *folio) > * future migrations of this same page. > */ > cpupid = page_cpupid_xchg_last(&folio->page, -1); > + /* > + * If migrate between slow and fast memory node, reset cpupid, > + * because that is used to record page access time in slow > + * memory node > + */ > + if (sysctl_numa_balancing_mode & NUMA_BALANCING_MEMORY_TIERING) { > + bool f_toptier = node_is_toptier(page_to_nid(&folio->page)); > + bool t_toptier = node_is_toptier(page_to_nid(&newfolio->page)); > + > + if (f_toptier != t_toptier) > + cpupid = -1; > + } > page_cpupid_xchg_last(&newfolio->page, cpupid); > > folio_migrate_ksm(newfolio, folio); > diff --git a/mm/mprotect.c b/mm/mprotect.c > index b69ce7a7b2b7..e7cb90d84fac 100644 > --- a/mm/mprotect.c > +++ b/mm/mprotect.c > @@ -85,6 +85,7 @@ static unsigned long change_pte_range(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pmd_t *pmd, > if (prot_numa) { > struct page *page; > int nid; > + bool toptier; > > /* Avoid TLB flush if possible */ > if (pte_protnone(oldpte)) > @@ -114,14 +115,19 @@ static unsigned long change_pte_range(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pmd_t *pmd, > nid = page_to_nid(page); > if (target_node == nid) > continue; > + toptier = node_is_toptier(nid); > > /* > * Skip scanning top tier node if normal numa > * balancing is disabled > */ > if (!(sysctl_numa_balancing_mode & NUMA_BALANCING_NORMAL) && > - node_is_toptier(nid)) > + toptier) > continue; > + if (sysctl_numa_balancing_mode & NUMA_BALANCING_MEMORY_TIERING && > + !toptier) > + xchg_page_access_time(page, > + jiffies_to_msecs(jiffies)); > } > > oldpte = ptep_modify_prot_start(vma, addr, pte); > -- > 2.30.2 > >
Hi, Jagdish, On Thu, 2022-04-14 at 18:53 +0530, Jagdish Gediya wrote: > On Fri, Apr 08, 2022 at 03:12:20PM +0800, Huang Ying wrote: [snip] > > + > > +static int numa_hint_fault_latency(struct page *page) > > +{ > > + int last_time, time; > > + > > + time = jiffies_to_msecs(jiffies); > > + last_time = xchg_page_access_time(page, time); > > + > > + return (time - last_time) & PAGE_ACCESS_TIME_MASK; > > This code can possibly consider cold page as hot, > > Assume, > > LAST_CPUPID_SHIFT = 12 > PAGE_ACCESS_TIME_BUCKETS = 0 > sysctl_numa_balancing_hot_threshold = 1000 > > Assume while changing pte, > jiffies_to_msecs(jiffies) = 0xAABB0100 > > So value saved in page->flags will be lowest 12 bits of 0xAABB0100 > which is 0x100. > > Assume when numa_hint_fault_latency() gets called, > time = jiffies_to_msecs(jiffies) = 0xAACC0100 > > So, time = 0xAACC0100, and last_time = 0x100, > time - last_time = 0xAACC0100 - 0x100 = 0xAACC0000 > 0xAACC0000 & PAGE_ACCESS_TIME_MASK = 0xAACC0000 & ((1 << 12) - 1) = 0 > > so the return value of this function is 0, the code will consider it as > hot page but it is cold page because actual difference is > 0xAACC0100 - 0xAABB0100 = 110000 ms > Yes. This is possible. > There may be more such scenarios. What do you think? The algorithm just works statistically correct. That is, for really hot pages, their hint page fault latency will be short and we can promote it when they are accessed. For cold pages, it's still possible for them to be identified as hot pages. But the possibility is much lower than that of the hot pages. We can try to improve further here. But as the first step, I want to keep the algorithm as simple as possible. Then we can try improve it step by step and show benefit in each step to justify the further optimization. > > +} > > + Best Regards, Huang, Ying
diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h index e34edb775334..455a3d0e699d 100644 --- a/include/linux/mm.h +++ b/include/linux/mm.h @@ -1311,6 +1311,18 @@ static inline int folio_nid(const struct folio *folio) } #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING +/* page access time bits needs to hold at least 4 seconds */ +#define PAGE_ACCESS_TIME_MIN_BITS 12 +#if LAST_CPUPID_SHIFT < PAGE_ACCESS_TIME_MIN_BITS +#define PAGE_ACCESS_TIME_BUCKETS \ + (PAGE_ACCESS_TIME_MIN_BITS - LAST_CPUPID_SHIFT) +#else +#define PAGE_ACCESS_TIME_BUCKETS 0 +#endif + +#define PAGE_ACCESS_TIME_MASK \ + (LAST_CPUPID_MASK << PAGE_ACCESS_TIME_BUCKETS) + static inline int cpu_pid_to_cpupid(int cpu, int pid) { return ((cpu & LAST__CPU_MASK) << LAST__PID_SHIFT) | (pid & LAST__PID_MASK); @@ -1346,6 +1358,11 @@ static inline bool __cpupid_match_pid(pid_t task_pid, int cpupid) return (task_pid & LAST__PID_MASK) == cpupid_to_pid(cpupid); } +static inline bool check_cpupid(int cpupid) +{ + return cpupid_to_cpu(cpupid) < nr_cpu_ids; +} + #define cpupid_match_pid(task, cpupid) __cpupid_match_pid(task->pid, cpupid) #ifdef LAST_CPUPID_NOT_IN_PAGE_FLAGS static inline int page_cpupid_xchg_last(struct page *page, int cpupid) @@ -1374,12 +1391,25 @@ static inline void page_cpupid_reset_last(struct page *page) page->flags |= LAST_CPUPID_MASK << LAST_CPUPID_PGSHIFT; } #endif /* LAST_CPUPID_NOT_IN_PAGE_FLAGS */ + +static inline int xchg_page_access_time(struct page *page, int time) +{ + int last_time; + + last_time = page_cpupid_xchg_last(page, time >> PAGE_ACCESS_TIME_BUCKETS); + return last_time << PAGE_ACCESS_TIME_BUCKETS; +} #else /* !CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING */ static inline int page_cpupid_xchg_last(struct page *page, int cpupid) { return page_to_nid(page); /* XXX */ } +static inline int xchg_page_access_time(struct page *page, int time) +{ + return 0; +} + static inline int page_cpupid_last(struct page *page) { return page_to_nid(page); /* XXX */ diff --git a/kernel/sched/debug.c b/kernel/sched/debug.c index bb3d63bdf4ae..ad63dbfc54f1 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/debug.c +++ b/kernel/sched/debug.c @@ -333,6 +333,7 @@ static __init int sched_init_debug(void) debugfs_create_u32("scan_period_min_ms", 0644, numa, &sysctl_numa_balancing_scan_period_min); debugfs_create_u32("scan_period_max_ms", 0644, numa, &sysctl_numa_balancing_scan_period_max); debugfs_create_u32("scan_size_mb", 0644, numa, &sysctl_numa_balancing_scan_size); + debugfs_create_u32("hot_threshold_ms", 0644, numa, &sysctl_numa_balancing_hot_threshold); #endif debugfs_create_file("debug", 0444, debugfs_sched, NULL, &sched_debug_fops); diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c index d4bd299d67ab..cb130ea46c71 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c @@ -1058,6 +1058,9 @@ unsigned int sysctl_numa_balancing_scan_size = 256; /* Scan @scan_size MB every @scan_period after an initial @scan_delay in ms */ unsigned int sysctl_numa_balancing_scan_delay = 1000; +/* The page with hint page fault latency < threshold in ms is considered hot */ +unsigned int sysctl_numa_balancing_hot_threshold = 1000; + struct numa_group { refcount_t refcount; @@ -1400,6 +1403,37 @@ static inline unsigned long group_weight(struct task_struct *p, int nid, return 1000 * faults / total_faults; } +static bool pgdat_free_space_enough(struct pglist_data *pgdat) +{ + int z; + unsigned long enough_mark; + + enough_mark = max(1UL * 1024 * 1024 * 1024 >> PAGE_SHIFT, + pgdat->node_present_pages >> 4); + for (z = pgdat->nr_zones - 1; z >= 0; z--) { + struct zone *zone = pgdat->node_zones + z; + + if (!populated_zone(zone)) + continue; + + if (zone_watermark_ok(zone, 0, + high_wmark_pages(zone) + enough_mark, + ZONE_MOVABLE, 0)) + return true; + } + return false; +} + +static int numa_hint_fault_latency(struct page *page) +{ + int last_time, time; + + time = jiffies_to_msecs(jiffies); + last_time = xchg_page_access_time(page, time); + + return (time - last_time) & PAGE_ACCESS_TIME_MASK; +} + bool should_numa_migrate_memory(struct task_struct *p, struct page * page, int src_nid, int dst_cpu) { @@ -1407,9 +1441,38 @@ bool should_numa_migrate_memory(struct task_struct *p, struct page * page, int dst_nid = cpu_to_node(dst_cpu); int last_cpupid, this_cpupid; + /* + * The pages in slow memory node should be migrated according + * to hot/cold instead of accessing CPU node. + */ + if (sysctl_numa_balancing_mode & NUMA_BALANCING_MEMORY_TIERING && + !node_is_toptier(src_nid)) { + struct pglist_data *pgdat; + unsigned long latency, th; + + pgdat = NODE_DATA(dst_nid); + if (pgdat_free_space_enough(pgdat)) + return true; + + th = sysctl_numa_balancing_hot_threshold; + latency = numa_hint_fault_latency(page); + if (latency >= th) + return false; + + return true; + } + this_cpupid = cpu_pid_to_cpupid(dst_cpu, current->pid); last_cpupid = page_cpupid_xchg_last(page, this_cpupid); + /* + * The cpupid may be invalid when NUMA_BALANCING_MEMORY_TIERING + * is disabled dynamically. + */ + if (!(sysctl_numa_balancing_mode & NUMA_BALANCING_MEMORY_TIERING) && + !node_is_toptier(src_nid) && !check_cpupid(last_cpupid)) + return false; + /* * Allow first faults or private faults to migrate immediately early in * the lifetime of a task. The magic number 4 is based on waiting for @@ -2642,6 +2705,17 @@ void task_numa_fault(int last_cpupid, int mem_node, int pages, int flags) if (!p->mm) return; + /* + * NUMA faults statistics are unnecessary for the slow memory node. + * + * And, the cpupid may be invalid when NUMA_BALANCING_MEMORY_TIERING + * is disabled dynamically. + */ + if (!node_is_toptier(mem_node) && + (sysctl_numa_balancing_mode & NUMA_BALANCING_MEMORY_TIERING || + !check_cpupid(last_cpupid))) + return; + /* Allocate buffer to track faults on a per-node basis */ if (unlikely(!p->numa_faults)) { int size = sizeof(*p->numa_faults) * diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h index 58263f90c559..86ce60d3d472 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/sched.h +++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h @@ -2408,6 +2408,7 @@ extern unsigned int sysctl_numa_balancing_scan_delay; extern unsigned int sysctl_numa_balancing_scan_period_min; extern unsigned int sysctl_numa_balancing_scan_period_max; extern unsigned int sysctl_numa_balancing_scan_size; +extern unsigned int sysctl_numa_balancing_hot_threshold; #endif #ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_HRTICK diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c index 2fe38212e07c..3a715eeeebb5 100644 --- a/mm/huge_memory.c +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c @@ -1401,7 +1401,7 @@ vm_fault_t do_huge_pmd_numa_page(struct vm_fault *vmf) struct page *page; unsigned long haddr = vmf->address & HPAGE_PMD_MASK; int page_nid = NUMA_NO_NODE; - int target_nid, last_cpupid = -1; + int target_nid, last_cpupid = (-1 & LAST_CPUPID_MASK); bool migrated = false; bool was_writable = pmd_savedwrite(oldpmd); int flags = 0; @@ -1422,7 +1422,8 @@ vm_fault_t do_huge_pmd_numa_page(struct vm_fault *vmf) flags |= TNF_NO_GROUP; page_nid = page_to_nid(page); - last_cpupid = page_cpupid_last(page); + if (node_is_toptier(page_nid)) + last_cpupid = page_cpupid_last(page); target_nid = numa_migrate_prep(page, vma, haddr, page_nid, &flags); @@ -1740,6 +1741,7 @@ int change_huge_pmd(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pmd_t *pmd, if (prot_numa) { struct page *page; + bool toptier; /* * Avoid trapping faults against the zero page. The read-only * data is likely to be read-cached on the local CPU and @@ -1752,13 +1754,18 @@ int change_huge_pmd(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pmd_t *pmd, goto unlock; page = pmd_page(*pmd); + toptier = node_is_toptier(page_to_nid(page)); /* * Skip scanning top tier node if normal numa * balancing is disabled */ if (!(sysctl_numa_balancing_mode & NUMA_BALANCING_NORMAL) && - node_is_toptier(page_to_nid(page))) + toptier) goto unlock; + + if (sysctl_numa_balancing_mode & NUMA_BALANCING_MEMORY_TIERING && + !toptier) + xchg_page_access_time(page, jiffies_to_msecs(jiffies)); } /* * In case prot_numa, we are under mmap_read_lock(mm). It's critical diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c index b370ed118767..a8ac15ce7a75 100644 --- a/mm/memory.c +++ b/mm/memory.c @@ -74,6 +74,7 @@ #include <linux/perf_event.h> #include <linux/ptrace.h> #include <linux/vmalloc.h> +#include <linux/sched/sysctl.h> #include <trace/events/kmem.h> @@ -4455,8 +4456,16 @@ static vm_fault_t do_numa_page(struct vm_fault *vmf) if (page_mapcount(page) > 1 && (vma->vm_flags & VM_SHARED)) flags |= TNF_SHARED; - last_cpupid = page_cpupid_last(page); page_nid = page_to_nid(page); + /* + * In memory tiering mode, cpupid of slow memory page is used + * to record page access time. So use default value. + */ + if ((sysctl_numa_balancing_mode & NUMA_BALANCING_MEMORY_TIERING) && + !node_is_toptier(page_nid)) + last_cpupid = (-1 & LAST_CPUPID_MASK); + else + last_cpupid = page_cpupid_last(page); target_nid = numa_migrate_prep(page, vma, vmf->address, page_nid, &flags); if (target_nid == NUMA_NO_NODE) { diff --git a/mm/migrate.c b/mm/migrate.c index dc84edfae842..e73f26dfeb38 100644 --- a/mm/migrate.c +++ b/mm/migrate.c @@ -534,6 +534,18 @@ void folio_migrate_flags(struct folio *newfolio, struct folio *folio) * future migrations of this same page. */ cpupid = page_cpupid_xchg_last(&folio->page, -1); + /* + * If migrate between slow and fast memory node, reset cpupid, + * because that is used to record page access time in slow + * memory node + */ + if (sysctl_numa_balancing_mode & NUMA_BALANCING_MEMORY_TIERING) { + bool f_toptier = node_is_toptier(page_to_nid(&folio->page)); + bool t_toptier = node_is_toptier(page_to_nid(&newfolio->page)); + + if (f_toptier != t_toptier) + cpupid = -1; + } page_cpupid_xchg_last(&newfolio->page, cpupid); folio_migrate_ksm(newfolio, folio); diff --git a/mm/mprotect.c b/mm/mprotect.c index b69ce7a7b2b7..e7cb90d84fac 100644 --- a/mm/mprotect.c +++ b/mm/mprotect.c @@ -85,6 +85,7 @@ static unsigned long change_pte_range(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pmd_t *pmd, if (prot_numa) { struct page *page; int nid; + bool toptier; /* Avoid TLB flush if possible */ if (pte_protnone(oldpte)) @@ -114,14 +115,19 @@ static unsigned long change_pte_range(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pmd_t *pmd, nid = page_to_nid(page); if (target_node == nid) continue; + toptier = node_is_toptier(nid); /* * Skip scanning top tier node if normal numa * balancing is disabled */ if (!(sysctl_numa_balancing_mode & NUMA_BALANCING_NORMAL) && - node_is_toptier(nid)) + toptier) continue; + if (sysctl_numa_balancing_mode & NUMA_BALANCING_MEMORY_TIERING && + !toptier) + xchg_page_access_time(page, + jiffies_to_msecs(jiffies)); } oldpte = ptep_modify_prot_start(vma, addr, pte);
To optimize page placement in a memory tiering system with NUMA balancing, the hot pages in the slow memory node need to be identified. Essentially, the original NUMA balancing implementation selects the mostly recently accessed (MRU) pages as the hot pages. But this isn't a very good algorithm to identify the hot pages. So, in this patch we implemented a better hot page selection algorithm. Which is based on NUMA balancing page table scanning and hint page fault as follows, - When the page tables of the processes are scanned to change PTE/PMD to be PROT_NONE, the current time is recorded in struct page as scan time. - When the page is accessed, hint page fault will occur. The scan time is gotten from the struct page. And The hint page fault latency is defined as hint page fault time - scan time The shorter the hint page fault latency of a page is, the higher the probability of their access frequency to be higher. So the hint page fault latency is a good estimation of the page hot/cold. But it's hard to find some extra space in struct page to hold the scan time. Fortunately, we can reuse some bits used by the original NUMA balancing. NUMA balancing uses some bits in struct page to store the page accessing CPU and PID (referring to page_cpupid_xchg_last()). Which is used by the multi-stage node selection algorithm to avoid to migrate pages shared accessed by the NUMA nodes back and forth. But for pages in the slow memory node, even if they are shared accessed by multiple NUMA nodes, as long as the pages are hot, they need to be promoted to the fast memory node. So the accessing CPU and PID information are unnecessary for the slow memory pages. We can reuse these bits in struct page to record the scan time for them. For the fast memory pages, these bits are used as before. For the hot threshold, the default value is 1 second, which works well in our performance test. All pages with hint page fault latency < the threshold will be considered hot. A debugfs interface is also provided to adjust the hot threshold. The downside of the above method is that the response time to the workload hot spot changing may be much longer. For example, - A previous cold memory area becomes hot - The hint page fault will be triggered. But the hint page fault latency isn't shorter than the hot threshold. So the pages will not be promoted. - When the memory area is scanned again, maybe after a scan period, the hint page fault latency measured will be shorter than the hot threshold and the pages will be promoted. To mitigate this, - If there are enough free space in the fast memory node, the hot threshold will not be used, all pages will be promoted upon the hint page fault for fast response. - If fast response is more important for system performance, the administrator can set a higher hot threshold. Thanks Zhong Jiang reported and tested the fix for a bug when disabling memory tiering mode dynamically. Signed-off-by: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com> Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com> Cc: Wei Xu <weixugc@google.com> Cc: osalvador <osalvador@suse.de> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Zhong Jiang <zhongjiang-ali@linux.alibaba.com> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org --- include/linux/mm.h | 30 ++++++++++++++++++ kernel/sched/debug.c | 1 + kernel/sched/fair.c | 74 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ kernel/sched/sched.h | 1 + mm/huge_memory.c | 13 ++++++-- mm/memory.c | 11 ++++++- mm/migrate.c | 12 +++++++ mm/mprotect.c | 8 ++++- 8 files changed, 145 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)