From patchwork Mon Jul 4 07:06:01 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" X-Patchwork-Id: 12904767 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20F1BC433EF for ; Mon, 4 Jul 2022 07:08:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 9155B900002; Mon, 4 Jul 2022 03:08:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 8C5076B0075; Mon, 4 Jul 2022 03:08:48 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 76634900002; Mon, 4 Jul 2022 03:08:48 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0012.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.12]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66AFD6B0074 for ; Mon, 4 Jul 2022 03:08:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin09.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay13.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45B3661C49 for ; Mon, 4 Jul 2022 07:08:10 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 79648538340.09.38F9CE7 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) by imf08.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D376160056 for ; Mon, 4 Jul 2022 07:08:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098417.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 2645pGwT003978; Mon, 4 Jul 2022 07:07:47 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=pp1; bh=VROdRSEQ/S0c3jBZGx05uszC//GrM1Yj8D2HDfideE0=; b=HWb+xpVpe8c47xCwArfvoa8K6+1DbGsK+hZakH7BrZznZatQeov7TEzkaL1X53WUtUDv HXHBVi43LW5Ugs7httMIhr9Zrhhh5PQLQSMxeTVUBSxq501BmIMYtwFAApsNvNIkJLCa eKKxAPIchVEIpKT/HNXaNT03eOBNolZo532eZQu85LC5Bmb6pC7Oz2k4DF+70cHrvJi1 BOt96/VHPlWitcBR5tQT8pO2CM5KxRQhkGdC8vRY6Vj3/DQCzApEcSKQFvAkNx/PUZ+3 Yq37/Lzvia6oUoNH5VKoaM1Bb5tFM/r42/hAHKgcgm0IORdDmpZowjgrJ+RJVKKKciEz DQ== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3h3te31fxv-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 04 Jul 2022 07:07:47 +0000 Received: from m0098417.ppops.net (m0098417.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 2646jTXm028984; Mon, 4 Jul 2022 07:07:46 GMT Received: from ppma03dal.us.ibm.com (b.bd.3ea9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.62.189.11]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3h3te31fxb-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 04 Jul 2022 07:07:46 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma03dal.us.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma03dal.us.ibm.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 264769GF007084; Mon, 4 Jul 2022 07:07:45 GMT Received: from b01cxnp22034.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01cxnp22034.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.198.24]) by ppma03dal.us.ibm.com with ESMTP id 3h2dn9hakx-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 04 Jul 2022 07:07:45 +0000 Received: from b01ledav002.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01ledav002.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.199.107]) by b01cxnp22034.gho.pok.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 26477itb65798614 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 4 Jul 2022 07:07:44 GMT Received: from b01ledav002.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5147F124058; Mon, 4 Jul 2022 07:07:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b01ledav002.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10972124053; Mon, 4 Jul 2022 07:07:38 +0000 (GMT) Received: from skywalker.ibmuc.com (unknown [9.43.74.198]) by b01ledav002.gho.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Mon, 4 Jul 2022 07:07:37 +0000 (GMT) From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" To: linux-mm@kvack.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org Cc: Wei Xu , Huang Ying , Yang Shi , Davidlohr Bueso , Tim C Chen , Michal Hocko , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Hesham Almatary , Dave Hansen , Jonathan Cameron , Alistair Popple , Dan Williams , Johannes Weiner , jvgediya.oss@gmail.com, "Aneesh Kumar K.V" , Jagdish Gediya Subject: [PATCH v8 01/12] mm/demotion: Add support for explicit memory tiers Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2022 12:36:01 +0530 Message-Id: <20220704070612.299585-2-aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.36.1 In-Reply-To: <20220704070612.299585-1-aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com> References: <20220704070612.299585-1-aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com> X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-GUID: -W6Ne9n39Qj_PtAwy1qJxyQ3QufGhdL5 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: L_Phx5VKpLsfSGtCbqPrFp6rRQqL0ko5 X-Proofpoint-UnRewURL: 0 URL was un-rewritten MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.205,Aquarius:18.0.883,Hydra:6.0.517,FMLib:17.11.122.1 definitions=2022-07-04_05,2022-06-28_01,2022-06-22_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 impostorscore=0 phishscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 malwarescore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 clxscore=1015 priorityscore=1501 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 suspectscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2204290000 definitions=main-2207040030 ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; imf08.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=ibm.com header.s=pp1 header.b=HWb+xpVp; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=ibm.com; spf=pass (imf08.hostedemail.com: domain of aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com designates 148.163.158.5 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; t=1656918489; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:dkim-signature; bh=VROdRSEQ/S0c3jBZGx05uszC//GrM1Yj8D2HDfideE0=; b=dFGB1efZUiWnajT5b8HQWmOaVtiPwlz/YeguQWmoGt1/l+gtqAUA3zxlDQVOTjnInHl0i4 j1T1HMeLJyqNfBH/Y3B/hXaiYZfZ10hYIM4SOGYo5FS2GmrCkp8+hVI2JxRkrkySDDPmWa iC2nQLlIdmOUAxkFhrGDeALM/gfItu8= ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-20220608; d=hostedemail.com; t=1656918489; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=2sw6+2/V8V0MQ0kL7LsF/gLqX9bX5nTUbjPNF+I/mk89PILPc3BWZeeXrIailY8o2qogSi GzCYq/a6Vz2W4KPXvkoUt+zm0YODBF3Yl9wLucY7ndJhFDE/pYZL9/zqVOlxiq4/R1OP8d 4n1bECtBCCkto7RWA/xmN2V6OZfbIK8= X-Stat-Signature: 4bkjgmjjjdepfap1btssxrsgnszeqy98 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 8D376160056 Authentication-Results: imf08.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=ibm.com header.s=pp1 header.b=HWb+xpVp; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=ibm.com; spf=pass (imf08.hostedemail.com: domain of aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com designates 148.163.158.5 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com X-Rspamd-Server: rspam03 X-Rspam-User: X-HE-Tag: 1656918489-31707 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: In the current kernel, memory tiers are defined implicitly via a demotion path relationship between NUMA nodes, which is created during the kernel initialization and updated when a NUMA node is hot-added or hot-removed. The current implementation puts all nodes with CPU into the top tier, and builds the tier hierarchy tier-by-tier by establishing the per-node demotion targets based on the distances between nodes. This current memory tier kernel interface needs to be improved for several important use cases, The current tier initialization code always initializes each memory-only NUMA node into a lower tier. But a memory-only NUMA node may have a high performance memory device (e.g. a DRAM device attached via CXL.mem or a DRAM-backed memory-only node on a virtual machine) and should be put into a higher tier. The current tier hierarchy always puts CPU nodes into the top tier. But on a system with HBM or GPU devices, the memory-only NUMA nodes mapping these devices should be in the top tier, and DRAM nodes with CPUs are better to be placed into the next lower tier. With current kernel higher tier node can only be demoted to selected nodes on the next lower tier as defined by the demotion path, not any other node from any lower tier. This strict, hard-coded demotion order does not work in all use cases (e.g. some use cases may want to allow cross-socket demotion to another node in the same demotion tier as a fallback when the preferred demotion node is out of space), This demotion order is also inconsistent with the page allocation fallback order when all the nodes in a higher tier are out of space: The page allocation can fall back to any node from any lower tier, whereas the demotion order doesn't allow that. The current kernel also don't provide any interfaces for the userspace to learn about the memory tier hierarchy in order to optimize its memory allocations. This patch series address the above by defining memory tiers explicitly. This patch introduce explicity memory tiers. The tier ID value of a memory tier is used to derive the demotion order between NUMA nodes. For example, if we have 3 memtiers: memtier100, memtier200, memiter300 then the memory tier order is: memtier300 -> memtier200 -> memtier100 where memtier300 is the highest tier and memtier100 is the lowest tier. While reclaim we migrate pages from fast(higher) tiers to slow(lower) tiers when the fast(higher) tier is under memory pressure. This patchset introduce 3 memory tiers (memtier100, memtier200 and memtier300) which are created by different kernel subsystems. The default memory tier created by the kernel is memtier200. A kernel parameter is provided to override the default memory tier. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/CAAPL-u9Wv+nH1VOZTj=9p9S70Y3Qz3+63EkqncRDdHfubsrjfw@mail.gmail.com Signed-off-by: Jagdish Gediya Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V --- include/linux/memory-tiers.h | 15 +++++++ mm/Makefile | 1 + mm/memory-tiers.c | 78 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 94 insertions(+) create mode 100644 include/linux/memory-tiers.h create mode 100644 mm/memory-tiers.c diff --git a/include/linux/memory-tiers.h b/include/linux/memory-tiers.h new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..a81dbc20e0d1 --- /dev/null +++ b/include/linux/memory-tiers.h @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */ +#ifndef _LINUX_MEMORY_TIERS_H +#define _LINUX_MEMORY_TIERS_H + +#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA + +#define MEMORY_TIER_HBM_GPU 300 +#define MEMORY_TIER_DRAM 200 +#define MEMORY_TIER_PMEM 100 + +#define DEFAULT_MEMORY_TIER MEMORY_TIER_DRAM +#define MAX_MEMORY_TIER_ID 400 + +#endif /* CONFIG_NUMA */ +#endif /* _LINUX_MEMORY_TIERS_H */ diff --git a/mm/Makefile b/mm/Makefile index 6f9ffa968a1a..d30acebc2164 100644 --- a/mm/Makefile +++ b/mm/Makefile @@ -92,6 +92,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_KFENCE) += kfence/ obj-$(CONFIG_FAILSLAB) += failslab.o obj-$(CONFIG_MEMTEST) += memtest.o obj-$(CONFIG_MIGRATION) += migrate.o +obj-$(CONFIG_NUMA) += memory-tiers.o obj-$(CONFIG_DEVICE_MIGRATION) += migrate_device.o obj-$(CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE) += huge_memory.o khugepaged.o obj-$(CONFIG_PAGE_COUNTER) += page_counter.o diff --git a/mm/memory-tiers.c b/mm/memory-tiers.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..69a5d81c0a12 --- /dev/null +++ b/mm/memory-tiers.c @@ -0,0 +1,78 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include + +struct memory_tier { + struct list_head list; + nodemask_t nodelist; + int id; +}; + +static DEFINE_MUTEX(memory_tier_lock); +static LIST_HEAD(memory_tiers); + +static void insert_memory_tier(struct memory_tier *memtier) +{ + struct list_head *ent; + struct memory_tier *tmp_memtier; + + lockdep_assert_held_once(&memory_tier_lock); + + list_for_each(ent, &memory_tiers) { + tmp_memtier = list_entry(ent, struct memory_tier, list); + if (tmp_memtier->id < memtier->id) { + list_add_tail(&memtier->list, ent); + return; + } + } + list_add_tail(&memtier->list, &memory_tiers); +} + +static struct memory_tier *register_memory_tier(unsigned int tier) +{ + struct memory_tier *memtier; + + if (tier > MAX_MEMORY_TIER_ID) + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); + + memtier = kzalloc(sizeof(struct memory_tier), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!memtier) + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); + + memtier->id = tier; + + insert_memory_tier(memtier); + + return memtier; +} + +static unsigned int default_memtier = DEFAULT_MEMORY_TIER; +core_param(default_memory_tier, default_memtier, uint, 0644); + +static int __init memory_tier_init(void) +{ + struct memory_tier *memtier; + + /* + * Register only default memory tier to hide all empty + * memory tier from sysfs. Since this is early during + * boot, we could avoid holding memtory_tier_lock. But + * keep it simple by holding locks. So we can add lock + * held debug checks in other functions. + */ + mutex_lock(&memory_tier_lock); + memtier = register_memory_tier(default_memtier); + if (IS_ERR(memtier)) + panic("%s() failed to register memory tier: %ld\n", + __func__, PTR_ERR(memtier)); + + /* CPU only nodes are not part of memory tiers. */ + memtier->nodelist = node_states[N_MEMORY]; + mutex_unlock(&memory_tier_lock); + return 0; +} +subsys_initcall(memory_tier_init);