Message ID | 20220706082016.2603916-13-chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | KVM: mm: fd-based approach for supporting KVM guest private memory | expand |
On Wed, Jul 06, 2022, Chao Peng wrote: > A page fault can carry the private/shared information for > KVM_MEM_PRIVATE memslot, this can be filled by architecture code(like > TDX code). To handle page fault for such access, KVM maps the page only > when this private property matches the host's view on the page. > > For a successful match, private pfn is obtained with memfile_notifier > callbacks from private fd and shared pfn is obtained with existing > get_user_pages. > > For a failed match, KVM causes a KVM_EXIT_MEMORY_FAULT exit to > userspace. Userspace then can convert memory between private/shared from > host's view then retry the access. > > Co-developed-by: Yu Zhang <yu.c.zhang@linux.intel.com> > Signed-off-by: Yu Zhang <yu.c.zhang@linux.intel.com> > Signed-off-by: Chao Peng <chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com> > --- > arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 60 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_internal.h | 18 ++++++++++ > arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmutrace.h | 1 + > include/linux/kvm_host.h | 35 ++++++++++++++++++- > 4 files changed, 112 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c > index 545eb74305fe..27dbdd4fe8d1 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c > @@ -3004,6 +3004,9 @@ int kvm_mmu_max_mapping_level(struct kvm *kvm, > if (max_level == PG_LEVEL_4K) > return PG_LEVEL_4K; > > + if (kvm_mem_is_private(kvm, gfn)) > + return max_level; > + > host_level = host_pfn_mapping_level(kvm, gfn, pfn, slot); > return min(host_level, max_level); > } > @@ -4101,10 +4104,52 @@ void kvm_arch_async_page_ready(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_async_pf *work) > kvm_mmu_do_page_fault(vcpu, work->cr2_or_gpa, 0, true); > } > > +static inline u8 order_to_level(int order) > +{ > + enum pg_level level; > + > + for (level = KVM_MAX_HUGEPAGE_LEVEL; level > PG_LEVEL_4K; level--) Curly braces needed for the for-loop. And I think it makes sense to take in the fault->max_level, that way this is slightly more performant when the guest mapping is smaller than the host, e.g. for (level = max_level; level > PG_LEVEL_4K; level--) ... return level; Though I think I'd vote to avoid a loop entirely and do: BUILD_BUG_ON(KVM_MAX_HUGEPAGE_LEVEL > PG_LEVEL_1G); if (order > ???) return PG_LEVEL_1G; if (order > ???) return PG_LEVEL_2M; return PG_LEVEL_4K; > + if (order >= page_level_shift(level) - PAGE_SHIFT) > + return level; > + return level; > +} > + > +static int kvm_faultin_pfn_private(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, > + struct kvm_page_fault *fault) > +{ > + int order; > + struct kvm_memory_slot *slot = fault->slot; > + bool private_exist = kvm_mem_is_private(vcpu->kvm, fault->gfn); > + > + if (fault->is_private != private_exist) { > + vcpu->run->exit_reason = KVM_EXIT_MEMORY_FAULT; > + if (fault->is_private) > + vcpu->run->memory.flags = KVM_MEMORY_EXIT_FLAG_PRIVATE; > + else > + vcpu->run->memory.flags = 0; > + vcpu->run->memory.padding = 0; > + vcpu->run->memory.gpa = fault->gfn << PAGE_SHIFT; > + vcpu->run->memory.size = PAGE_SIZE; > + return RET_PF_USER; > + } > + > + if (fault->is_private) { > + if (kvm_private_mem_get_pfn(slot, fault->gfn, &fault->pfn, &order)) > + return RET_PF_RETRY; > + fault->max_level = min(order_to_level(order), fault->max_level); > + fault->map_writable = !(slot->flags & KVM_MEM_READONLY); > + return RET_PF_FIXED; > + } > + > + /* Fault is shared, fallthrough. */ > + return RET_PF_CONTINUE; > +} > + > static int kvm_faultin_pfn(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_page_fault *fault) > { > struct kvm_memory_slot *slot = fault->slot; > bool async; > + int r; > > /* > * Retry the page fault if the gfn hit a memslot that is being deleted > @@ -4133,6 +4178,12 @@ static int kvm_faultin_pfn(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_page_fault *fault) > return RET_PF_EMULATE; > } > > + if (kvm_slot_can_be_private(slot)) { > + r = kvm_faultin_pfn_private(vcpu, fault); > + if (r != RET_PF_CONTINUE) > + return r == RET_PF_FIXED ? RET_PF_CONTINUE : r; I apologize if I've given you conflicting feedback in the past. Now that this returns RET_PF_* directly, I definitely think it makes sense to do: if (kvm_slot_can_be_private(slot) && fault->is_private != kvm_mem_is_private(vcpu->kvm, fault->gfn)) { vcpu->run->exit_reason = KVM_EXIT_MEMORY_FAULT; if (fault->is_private) vcpu->run->memory.flags = KVM_MEMORY_EXIT_FLAG_PRIVATE; else vcpu->run->memory.flags = 0; vcpu->run->memory.padding = 0; vcpu->run->memory.gpa = fault->gfn << PAGE_SHIFT; vcpu->run->memory.size = PAGE_SIZE; return RET_PF_USER; } if (fault->is_private) return kvm_faultin_pfn_private(vcpu, fault); That way kvm_faultin_pfn_private() only handles private faults, and this doesn't need to play games with RET_PF_FIXED. > + } > + > async = false; > fault->pfn = __gfn_to_pfn_memslot(slot, fault->gfn, false, &async, > fault->write, &fault->map_writable, > @@ -4241,7 +4292,11 @@ static int direct_page_fault(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_page_fault *fault > read_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->mmu_lock); > else > write_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->mmu_lock); > - kvm_release_pfn_clean(fault->pfn); > + > + if (fault->is_private) > + kvm_private_mem_put_pfn(fault->slot, fault->pfn); > + else > + kvm_release_pfn_clean(fault->pfn); AFAIK, we never bottomed out on whether or not this is needed[*]. Can you follow up with Kirill to get an answer before posting v8? [*] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220620141647.GC2016793@chaop.bj.intel.com
On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 08:58:41PM +0000, Sean Christopherson wrote: > On Wed, Jul 06, 2022, Chao Peng wrote: > > A page fault can carry the private/shared information for > > KVM_MEM_PRIVATE memslot, this can be filled by architecture code(like > > TDX code). To handle page fault for such access, KVM maps the page only > > when this private property matches the host's view on the page. > > > > For a successful match, private pfn is obtained with memfile_notifier > > callbacks from private fd and shared pfn is obtained with existing > > get_user_pages. > > > > For a failed match, KVM causes a KVM_EXIT_MEMORY_FAULT exit to > > userspace. Userspace then can convert memory between private/shared from > > host's view then retry the access. > > > > Co-developed-by: Yu Zhang <yu.c.zhang@linux.intel.com> > > Signed-off-by: Yu Zhang <yu.c.zhang@linux.intel.com> > > Signed-off-by: Chao Peng <chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com> > > --- > > arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 60 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > > arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_internal.h | 18 ++++++++++ > > arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmutrace.h | 1 + > > include/linux/kvm_host.h | 35 ++++++++++++++++++- > > 4 files changed, 112 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c > > index 545eb74305fe..27dbdd4fe8d1 100644 > > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c > > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c > > @@ -3004,6 +3004,9 @@ int kvm_mmu_max_mapping_level(struct kvm *kvm, > > if (max_level == PG_LEVEL_4K) > > return PG_LEVEL_4K; > > > > + if (kvm_mem_is_private(kvm, gfn)) > > + return max_level; > > + > > host_level = host_pfn_mapping_level(kvm, gfn, pfn, slot); > > return min(host_level, max_level); > > } > > @@ -4101,10 +4104,52 @@ void kvm_arch_async_page_ready(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_async_pf *work) > > kvm_mmu_do_page_fault(vcpu, work->cr2_or_gpa, 0, true); > > } > > > > +static inline u8 order_to_level(int order) > > +{ > > + enum pg_level level; > > + > > + for (level = KVM_MAX_HUGEPAGE_LEVEL; level > PG_LEVEL_4K; level--) > > Curly braces needed for the for-loop. > > And I think it makes sense to take in the fault->max_level, that way this is > slightly more performant when the guest mapping is smaller than the host, e.g. > > for (level = max_level; level > PG_LEVEL_4K; level--) > ... > > return level; > > Though I think I'd vote to avoid a loop entirely and do: > > BUILD_BUG_ON(KVM_MAX_HUGEPAGE_LEVEL > PG_LEVEL_1G); > > if (order > ???) > return PG_LEVEL_1G; > > if (order > ???) > return PG_LEVEL_2M; > > return PG_LEVEL_4K; Sounds good. > > > > + if (order >= page_level_shift(level) - PAGE_SHIFT) > > + return level; > > + return level; > > +} > > + > > +static int kvm_faultin_pfn_private(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, > > + struct kvm_page_fault *fault) > > +{ > > + int order; > > + struct kvm_memory_slot *slot = fault->slot; > > + bool private_exist = kvm_mem_is_private(vcpu->kvm, fault->gfn); > > + > > + if (fault->is_private != private_exist) { > > + vcpu->run->exit_reason = KVM_EXIT_MEMORY_FAULT; > > + if (fault->is_private) > > + vcpu->run->memory.flags = KVM_MEMORY_EXIT_FLAG_PRIVATE; > > + else > > + vcpu->run->memory.flags = 0; > > + vcpu->run->memory.padding = 0; > > + vcpu->run->memory.gpa = fault->gfn << PAGE_SHIFT; > > + vcpu->run->memory.size = PAGE_SIZE; > > + return RET_PF_USER; > > + } > > + > > + if (fault->is_private) { > > + if (kvm_private_mem_get_pfn(slot, fault->gfn, &fault->pfn, &order)) > > + return RET_PF_RETRY; > > + fault->max_level = min(order_to_level(order), fault->max_level); > > + fault->map_writable = !(slot->flags & KVM_MEM_READONLY); > > + return RET_PF_FIXED; > > + } > > + > > + /* Fault is shared, fallthrough. */ > > + return RET_PF_CONTINUE; > > +} > > + > > static int kvm_faultin_pfn(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_page_fault *fault) > > { > > struct kvm_memory_slot *slot = fault->slot; > > bool async; > > + int r; > > > > /* > > * Retry the page fault if the gfn hit a memslot that is being deleted > > @@ -4133,6 +4178,12 @@ static int kvm_faultin_pfn(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_page_fault *fault) > > return RET_PF_EMULATE; > > } > > > > + if (kvm_slot_can_be_private(slot)) { > > + r = kvm_faultin_pfn_private(vcpu, fault); > > + if (r != RET_PF_CONTINUE) > > + return r == RET_PF_FIXED ? RET_PF_CONTINUE : r; > > I apologize if I've given you conflicting feedback in the past. Now that this > returns RET_PF_* directly, I definitely think it makes sense to do: > > if (kvm_slot_can_be_private(slot) && > fault->is_private != kvm_mem_is_private(vcpu->kvm, fault->gfn)) { > vcpu->run->exit_reason = KVM_EXIT_MEMORY_FAULT; > if (fault->is_private) > vcpu->run->memory.flags = KVM_MEMORY_EXIT_FLAG_PRIVATE; > else > vcpu->run->memory.flags = 0; > vcpu->run->memory.padding = 0; > vcpu->run->memory.gpa = fault->gfn << PAGE_SHIFT; > vcpu->run->memory.size = PAGE_SIZE; > return RET_PF_USER; > } > > if (fault->is_private) > return kvm_faultin_pfn_private(vcpu, fault); > > That way kvm_faultin_pfn_private() only handles private faults, and this doesn't > need to play games with RET_PF_FIXED. Agreed, this looks much simpler. > > > > + } > > + > > async = false; > > fault->pfn = __gfn_to_pfn_memslot(slot, fault->gfn, false, &async, > > fault->write, &fault->map_writable, > > @@ -4241,7 +4292,11 @@ static int direct_page_fault(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_page_fault *fault > > read_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->mmu_lock); > > else > > write_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->mmu_lock); > > - kvm_release_pfn_clean(fault->pfn); > > + > > + if (fault->is_private) > > + kvm_private_mem_put_pfn(fault->slot, fault->pfn); > > + else > > + kvm_release_pfn_clean(fault->pfn); > > AFAIK, we never bottomed out on whether or not this is needed[*]. Can you follow > up with Kirill to get an answer before posting v8? Sure. Chao > > [*] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220620141647.GC2016793@chaop.bj.intel.com
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c index 545eb74305fe..27dbdd4fe8d1 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c @@ -3004,6 +3004,9 @@ int kvm_mmu_max_mapping_level(struct kvm *kvm, if (max_level == PG_LEVEL_4K) return PG_LEVEL_4K; + if (kvm_mem_is_private(kvm, gfn)) + return max_level; + host_level = host_pfn_mapping_level(kvm, gfn, pfn, slot); return min(host_level, max_level); } @@ -4101,10 +4104,52 @@ void kvm_arch_async_page_ready(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_async_pf *work) kvm_mmu_do_page_fault(vcpu, work->cr2_or_gpa, 0, true); } +static inline u8 order_to_level(int order) +{ + enum pg_level level; + + for (level = KVM_MAX_HUGEPAGE_LEVEL; level > PG_LEVEL_4K; level--) + if (order >= page_level_shift(level) - PAGE_SHIFT) + return level; + return level; +} + +static int kvm_faultin_pfn_private(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, + struct kvm_page_fault *fault) +{ + int order; + struct kvm_memory_slot *slot = fault->slot; + bool private_exist = kvm_mem_is_private(vcpu->kvm, fault->gfn); + + if (fault->is_private != private_exist) { + vcpu->run->exit_reason = KVM_EXIT_MEMORY_FAULT; + if (fault->is_private) + vcpu->run->memory.flags = KVM_MEMORY_EXIT_FLAG_PRIVATE; + else + vcpu->run->memory.flags = 0; + vcpu->run->memory.padding = 0; + vcpu->run->memory.gpa = fault->gfn << PAGE_SHIFT; + vcpu->run->memory.size = PAGE_SIZE; + return RET_PF_USER; + } + + if (fault->is_private) { + if (kvm_private_mem_get_pfn(slot, fault->gfn, &fault->pfn, &order)) + return RET_PF_RETRY; + fault->max_level = min(order_to_level(order), fault->max_level); + fault->map_writable = !(slot->flags & KVM_MEM_READONLY); + return RET_PF_FIXED; + } + + /* Fault is shared, fallthrough. */ + return RET_PF_CONTINUE; +} + static int kvm_faultin_pfn(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_page_fault *fault) { struct kvm_memory_slot *slot = fault->slot; bool async; + int r; /* * Retry the page fault if the gfn hit a memslot that is being deleted @@ -4133,6 +4178,12 @@ static int kvm_faultin_pfn(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_page_fault *fault) return RET_PF_EMULATE; } + if (kvm_slot_can_be_private(slot)) { + r = kvm_faultin_pfn_private(vcpu, fault); + if (r != RET_PF_CONTINUE) + return r == RET_PF_FIXED ? RET_PF_CONTINUE : r; + } + async = false; fault->pfn = __gfn_to_pfn_memslot(slot, fault->gfn, false, &async, fault->write, &fault->map_writable, @@ -4241,7 +4292,11 @@ static int direct_page_fault(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_page_fault *fault read_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->mmu_lock); else write_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->mmu_lock); - kvm_release_pfn_clean(fault->pfn); + + if (fault->is_private) + kvm_private_mem_put_pfn(fault->slot, fault->pfn); + else + kvm_release_pfn_clean(fault->pfn); return r; } @@ -5518,6 +5573,9 @@ int noinline kvm_mmu_page_fault(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t cr2_or_gpa, u64 err return -EIO; } + if (r == RET_PF_USER) + return 0; + if (r < 0) return r; if (r != RET_PF_EMULATE) diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_internal.h b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_internal.h index ae2d660e2dab..fb9c298abcf0 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_internal.h +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_internal.h @@ -188,6 +188,7 @@ struct kvm_page_fault { /* Derived from mmu and global state. */ const bool is_tdp; + const bool is_private; const bool nx_huge_page_workaround_enabled; /* @@ -236,6 +237,7 @@ int kvm_tdp_page_fault(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_page_fault *fault); * RET_PF_RETRY: let CPU fault again on the address. * RET_PF_EMULATE: mmio page fault, emulate the instruction directly. * RET_PF_INVALID: the spte is invalid, let the real page fault path update it. + * RET_PF_USER: need to exit to userspace to handle this fault. * RET_PF_FIXED: The faulting entry has been fixed. * RET_PF_SPURIOUS: The faulting entry was already fixed, e.g. by another vCPU. * @@ -252,6 +254,7 @@ enum { RET_PF_RETRY, RET_PF_EMULATE, RET_PF_INVALID, + RET_PF_USER, RET_PF_FIXED, RET_PF_SPURIOUS, }; @@ -318,4 +321,19 @@ void *mmu_memory_cache_alloc(struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache *mc); void account_huge_nx_page(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp); void unaccount_huge_nx_page(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp); +#ifndef CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_PRIVATE_MEM +static inline int kvm_private_mem_get_pfn(struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, + gfn_t gfn, kvm_pfn_t *pfn, int *order) +{ + WARN_ON_ONCE(1); + return -EOPNOTSUPP; +} + +static inline void kvm_private_mem_put_pfn(struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, + kvm_pfn_t pfn) +{ + WARN_ON_ONCE(1); +} +#endif /* CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_PRIVATE_MEM */ + #endif /* __KVM_X86_MMU_INTERNAL_H */ diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmutrace.h b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmutrace.h index ae86820cef69..2d7555381955 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmutrace.h +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmutrace.h @@ -58,6 +58,7 @@ TRACE_DEFINE_ENUM(RET_PF_CONTINUE); TRACE_DEFINE_ENUM(RET_PF_RETRY); TRACE_DEFINE_ENUM(RET_PF_EMULATE); TRACE_DEFINE_ENUM(RET_PF_INVALID); +TRACE_DEFINE_ENUM(RET_PF_USER); TRACE_DEFINE_ENUM(RET_PF_FIXED); TRACE_DEFINE_ENUM(RET_PF_SPURIOUS); diff --git a/include/linux/kvm_host.h b/include/linux/kvm_host.h index da33f8828456..8f56426aa1e3 100644 --- a/include/linux/kvm_host.h +++ b/include/linux/kvm_host.h @@ -778,6 +778,10 @@ struct kvm { #if defined(CONFIG_MMU_NOTIFIER) && defined(KVM_ARCH_WANT_MMU_NOTIFIER) struct mmu_notifier mmu_notifier; +#endif + +#if (defined(CONFIG_MMU_NOTIFIER) && defined(KVM_ARCH_WANT_MMU_NOTIFIER)) || \ + defined(CONFIG_MEMFILE_NOTIFIER) unsigned long mmu_updating_seq; long mmu_updating_count; gfn_t mmu_updating_range_start; @@ -1917,7 +1921,8 @@ extern const struct _kvm_stats_desc kvm_vm_stats_desc[]; extern const struct kvm_stats_header kvm_vcpu_stats_header; extern const struct _kvm_stats_desc kvm_vcpu_stats_desc[]; -#if defined(CONFIG_MMU_NOTIFIER) && defined(KVM_ARCH_WANT_MMU_NOTIFIER) +#if (defined(CONFIG_MMU_NOTIFIER) && defined(KVM_ARCH_WANT_MMU_NOTIFIER)) || \ + defined(CONFIG_MEMFILE_NOTIFIER) static inline int mmu_updating_retry(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long mmu_seq) { if (unlikely(kvm->mmu_updating_count)) @@ -2266,4 +2271,32 @@ static inline void kvm_handle_signal_exit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) /* Max number of entries allowed for each kvm dirty ring */ #define KVM_DIRTY_RING_MAX_ENTRIES 65536 +#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_PRIVATE_MEM +static inline int kvm_private_mem_get_pfn(struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, + gfn_t gfn, kvm_pfn_t *pfn, int *order) +{ + int ret; + pfn_t pfnt; + pgoff_t index = gfn - slot->base_gfn + + (slot->private_offset >> PAGE_SHIFT); + + ret = slot->notifier.bs->get_pfn(slot->private_file, index, &pfnt, + order); + *pfn = pfn_t_to_pfn(pfnt); + return ret; +} + +static inline void kvm_private_mem_put_pfn(struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, + kvm_pfn_t pfn) +{ + slot->notifier.bs->put_pfn(pfn_to_pfn_t(pfn)); +} + +static inline bool kvm_mem_is_private(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t gfn) +{ + return !!xa_load(&kvm->mem_attr_array, gfn); +} + +#endif /* CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_PRIVATE_MEM */ + #endif