diff mbox series

[PATCHv5,OPTIONAL,13/13] selftests/x86/lam: Add tests cases for LAM_U48

Message ID 20220712231328.5294-14-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com (mailing list archive)
State New
Headers show
Series Linear Address Masking enabling | expand

Commit Message

Kirill A. Shutemov July 12, 2022, 11:13 p.m. UTC 
From: Weihong Zhang <weihong.zhang@intel.com>

LAM supports configurations that differ regarding which pointer bits are masked.
With LAM_U48, bits 62:48 in pointers can be masked as metadata bits, the width
of LAM is 15.

Add test cases in existed test scenarios:

MALLOC:

 - Enable LAM_U48, masks bits 48:62 of user pointers as metadata, the
   process can dereference these pointers.

MMAP:

 - Enable LAM_U48, mmaping with high address (above bits 47) have to be
   failed, which lead to trigger SIGSEGV.

 - LAM_U48 can't be enabled if there is a mmaping with high
   address(above bits 47) before enable LAM_U48.

SYSCALL:

 - LAM supports set metadata in high bits 62:48 (LAM48) of user process,
   pass these pointers to SYSCALL, SYSCALL can dereference pointers and
   return correct result.

IO_URING:

 - Add LAM_U48 test on IO_URING, Enable LAM_U48, set metadata in bits
   62:48 of buffers, IO_URING can handle these buffers well.

FORK/EXEC:

 - Add LAM_U48 test cases in inherit scenarios. these cases should same
   as LAM_U57;

Signed-off-by: Weihong Zhang <weihong.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/x86/lam.c | 67 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 66 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/lam.c b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/lam.c
index fcac5feb47d0..b354e57bf072 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/lam.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/lam.c
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ 
 /* LAM modes, these definitions were copied from kernel code */
 #define LAM_NONE                0
 #define LAM_U57_BITS            6
+#define LAM_U48_BITS            15
 /* arch prctl for LAM */
 #define ARCH_GET_UNTAG_MASK     0x4001
 #define ARCH_ENABLE_TAGGED_ADDR 0x4002
@@ -126,7 +127,7 @@  static int set_lam(unsigned long lam)
 	int ret = 0;
 	uint64_t ptr = 0;
 
-	if (lam != LAM_U57_BITS && lam != LAM_NONE)
+	if (lam != LAM_U48_BITS && lam != LAM_U57_BITS && lam != LAM_NONE)
 		return -1;
 
 	/* Skip check return */
@@ -138,6 +139,8 @@  static int set_lam(unsigned long lam)
 	/* Check mask returned is expected */
 	if (lam == LAM_U57_BITS)
 		ret = (ptr != ~(0x3fULL << 57));
+	else if (lam == LAM_U48_BITS)
+		ret = (ptr != ~(0x7fffULL << 48));
 	else if (lam == LAM_NONE)
 		ret = (ptr != -1ULL);
 
@@ -161,6 +164,8 @@  static int get_lam(void)
 		ret = LAM_U57_BITS;
 	else if (ptr == -1ULL)
 		ret = LAM_NONE;
+	else if (ptr == ~(0x7fffULL << 48))
+		ret = LAM_U48_BITS;
 
 
 	return ret;
@@ -176,6 +181,9 @@  static uint64_t get_metadata(uint64_t src, unsigned long lam)
 	metadata = rand();
 
 	switch (lam) {
+	case LAM_U48_BITS: /* Set metadata in bits 62:48 */
+		metadata = (src & ~(0x7fffULL << 48)) | ((metadata & 0x7fff) << 48);
+		break;
 	case LAM_U57_BITS: /* Set metadata in bits 62:57 */
 		metadata = (src & ~(0x3fULL << 57)) | ((metadata & 0x3f) << 57);
 		break;
@@ -552,6 +560,9 @@  int do_uring(unsigned long lam)
 			uint64_t addr = ((uint64_t)fi->iovecs[i].iov_base);
 
 			switch (lam) {
+			case LAM_U48_BITS: /* Clear bits 62:48 */
+				addr = (addr & ~(0x7fffULL << 48));
+				break;
 			case LAM_U57_BITS: /* Clear bits 62:57 */
 				addr = (addr & ~(0x3fULL << 57));
 				break;
@@ -696,6 +707,12 @@  static struct testcases uring_cases[] = {
 		.test_func = handle_uring,
 		.msg = "URING: LAM_U57. Dereferencing pointer with metadata\n",
 	},
+	{
+		.later = 0,
+		.lam = LAM_U48_BITS,
+		.test_func = handle_uring,
+		.msg = "URING: LAM_U48. Dereferencing pointer with metadata.\n",
+	},
 	{
 		.later = 1,
 		.expected = 1,
@@ -712,6 +729,12 @@  static struct testcases malloc_cases[] = {
 		.test_func = handle_malloc,
 		.msg = "MALLOC: LAM_U57. Dereferencing pointer with metadata\n",
 	},
+	{
+		.later = 0,
+		.lam = LAM_U48_BITS,
+		.test_func = handle_malloc,
+		.msg = "MALLOC: LAM_U48. Dereferencing pointer with metadata.\n",
+	},
 	{
 		.later = 1,
 		.expected = 2,
@@ -728,6 +751,12 @@  static struct testcases syscall_cases[] = {
 		.test_func = handle_syscall,
 		.msg = "SYSCALL: LAM_U57. syscall with metadata\n",
 	},
+	{
+		.later = 0,
+		.lam = LAM_U48_BITS,
+		.test_func = handle_syscall,
+		.msg = "SYSCALL: LAM_U48. syscall with metadata\n",
+	},
 	{
 		.later = 1,
 		.expected = 1,
@@ -738,6 +767,14 @@  static struct testcases syscall_cases[] = {
 };
 
 static struct testcases mmap_cases[] = {
+	{
+		.later = 0,
+		.expected = 2,
+		.lam = LAM_U48_BITS,
+		.addr = HIGH_ADDR,
+		.test_func = handle_mmap,
+		.msg = "MMAP: [Negtive] First LAM_U48, then High address.\n",
+	},
 	{
 		.later = 1,
 		.expected = 0,
@@ -746,6 +783,14 @@  static struct testcases mmap_cases[] = {
 		.test_func = handle_mmap,
 		.msg = "MMAP: First mmap high address, then set LAM_U57.\n",
 	},
+	{
+		.later = 1,
+		.expected = 1,
+		.lam = LAM_U48_BITS,
+		.addr = HIGH_ADDR,
+		.test_func = handle_mmap,
+		.msg = "MMAP: [Negtive] First mmap high address, then set LAM_U48.\n",
+	},
 	{
 		.later = 0,
 		.expected = 0,
@@ -762,6 +807,14 @@  static struct testcases mmap_cases[] = {
 		.test_func = handle_mmap,
 		.msg = "MMAP: First LAM_U57, then Low address.\n",
 	},
+	{
+		.later = 0,
+		.expected = 0,
+		.lam = LAM_U48_BITS,
+		.addr = LOW_ADDR,
+		.test_func = handle_mmap,
+		.msg = "MMAP: First LAM_U48, then low address.\n",
+	},
 };
 
 static struct testcases inheritance_cases[] = {
@@ -771,12 +824,24 @@  static struct testcases inheritance_cases[] = {
 		.test_func = handle_inheritance,
 		.msg = "FORK: LAM_U57, child process should get LAM mode same as parent\n",
 	},
+	{
+		.expected = 0,
+		.lam = LAM_U48_BITS,
+		.test_func = handle_inheritance,
+		.msg = "FORK: LAM_U48, child process should get LAM mode same as parent\n",
+	},
 	{
 		.expected = 0,
 		.lam = LAM_U57_BITS,
 		.test_func = handle_execve,
 		.msg = "EXECVE: LAM_U57, child process should get disabled LAM mode\n",
 	},
+	{
+		.expected = 0,
+		.lam = LAM_U48_BITS,
+		.test_func = handle_execve,
+		.msg = "EXECVE: LAM_U48, child process should get disabled LAM mode\n",
+	},
 };
 
 static void cmd_help(void)