From patchwork Thu Aug 18 13:10:40 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" X-Patchwork-Id: 12947947 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14569C28B2B for ; Thu, 18 Aug 2022 21:09:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 71E658D0003; Thu, 18 Aug 2022 17:09:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 6CF288D0002; Thu, 18 Aug 2022 17:09:32 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 547E08D0003; Thu, 18 Aug 2022 17:09:32 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0015.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.15]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4633D8D0002 for ; Thu, 18 Aug 2022 17:09:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin14.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay09.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44F1382558 for ; Thu, 18 Aug 2022 21:09:30 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 79813954500.14.5A970E1 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) by imf09.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B23A9140A32 for ; Thu, 18 Aug 2022 21:04:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098417.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 27ICxpka026757; Thu, 18 Aug 2022 13:11:45 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=ZGi0zkTBJ3xmi2kyZ6V3Nh+fxC21FPCvnjIKT7n9plU=; b=DJ2J1jy7w9oUUYK6M3yXr3r6TSe3MXgzF35ELtC+bt6H+nFIfr+2Wn9ZtPJMFxxW66Xw /YwrOMa72YImUrhNjahk2hcVpzZaSQwpuO30Slts74jJ5oeCjreVM0kHIxRRsLfXHeaT 4BS7q5+Y1VVpDWmN2sXXgZnY/U/2Ns3SFljkH0lZGcwSJ1ZM7KWtJAU79Ut0f6uLZ+2h AIHbPR20RZVpMNFTlLVEc+eOfXUuJmjVmhoHoFoYPAWk8QqZ+cCmJ/A0rT3hoH1UVFvc ZFd1yyyr3g8j6hSDRxb8ES+mQyyPtfYWgTQ0E/dxKph8YuEG6l+EBZyX9RtSDfJXGYEs rw== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3j1nx0rjg1-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 18 Aug 2022 13:11:45 +0000 Received: from m0098417.ppops.net (m0098417.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 27ID095U028151; Thu, 18 Aug 2022 13:11:44 GMT Received: from ppma01wdc.us.ibm.com (fd.55.37a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.55.85.253]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3j1nx0rjfd-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 18 Aug 2022 13:11:44 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma01wdc.us.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma01wdc.us.ibm.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 27ID6UKO003231; Thu, 18 Aug 2022 13:11:43 GMT Received: from b01cxnp22035.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01cxnp22035.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.198.25]) by ppma01wdc.us.ibm.com with ESMTP id 3hx3k9pygp-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 18 Aug 2022 13:11:43 +0000 Received: from b01ledav002.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01ledav002.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.199.107]) by b01cxnp22035.gho.pok.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 27IDBheY9175686 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 18 Aug 2022 13:11:43 GMT Received: from b01ledav002.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28664124052; Thu, 18 Aug 2022 13:11:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b01ledav002.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A166124053; Thu, 18 Aug 2022 13:11:38 +0000 (GMT) Received: from skywalker.ibmuc.com (unknown [9.43.111.107]) by b01ledav002.gho.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Aug 2022 13:11:37 +0000 (GMT) From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" To: linux-mm@kvack.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org Cc: Wei Xu , Huang Ying , Yang Shi , Davidlohr Bueso , Tim C Chen , Michal Hocko , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Hesham Almatary , Dave Hansen , Jonathan Cameron , Alistair Popple , Dan Williams , Johannes Weiner , jvgediya.oss@gmail.com, Bharata B Rao , "Aneesh Kumar K . V" Subject: [PATCH v15 08/10] mm/demotion: Demote pages according to allocation fallback order Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2022 18:40:40 +0530 Message-Id: <20220818131042.113280-9-aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.37.2 In-Reply-To: <20220818131042.113280-1-aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com> References: <20220818131042.113280-1-aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-GUID: F5aMTFKmc3FEEfgEfGUGLUpnSyjaqyTG X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: ycA9iy6aLJXGEFNgGqqIdVFejkkEvzfk X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.205,Aquarius:18.0.895,Hydra:6.0.517,FMLib:17.11.122.1 definitions=2022-08-18_12,2022-08-18_01,2022-06-22_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 malwarescore=0 priorityscore=1501 mlxscore=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 phishscore=0 clxscore=1015 bulkscore=0 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2207270000 definitions=main-2208180045 ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; t=1660856678; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:dkim-signature; bh=ZGi0zkTBJ3xmi2kyZ6V3Nh+fxC21FPCvnjIKT7n9plU=; b=xOl2ffQXXT5C4zFpyszjUne0iJOqrxNtPuo/ZzW0dhzIds7Enf8M5pi5vW2YnsgRCeK/Kr xyxzHfenRIpOImkvCCX/1bOowAI7KVkxt3VcHNaRJuMeLAxpFsCDAbmEazwMC8W6sr2R4G +QQl+bcleCnOtsBpG0b5eb0xcTZ1CUc= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; imf09.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=ibm.com header.s=pp1 header.b=DJ2J1jy7; spf=pass (imf09.hostedemail.com: domain of aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com designates 148.163.158.5 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=ibm.com ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-20220608; d=hostedemail.com; t=1660856678; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=2Qn8JKPdxOviYMVccexFr04xKOV++oxePD+pUVqCt9dhX8a5pMzrOqZUQSXJUQG/qYTmLS 5wE+b8oh+k0Sqqgtt7Wv7rVd4g7RV+5rXzNPYyzQ6pHYoau2b8l3md4mlfHXiGw8NpmNaF 1bxg/MiY8MXp7YCp12dwpuNGJjRYfLg= X-Rspam-User: Authentication-Results: imf09.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=ibm.com header.s=pp1 header.b=DJ2J1jy7; spf=pass (imf09.hostedemail.com: domain of aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com designates 148.163.158.5 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=ibm.com X-Stat-Signature: 77y618ro4u9fxtxarxcfdb9ojt9bua1f X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: B23A9140A32 X-Rspamd-Server: rspam05 X-HE-Tag: 1660856678-289690 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: From: Jagdish Gediya Currently, a higher tier node can only be demoted to selected nodes on the next lower tier as defined by the demotion path. This strict demotion order does not work in all use cases (e.g. some use cases may want to allow cross-socket demotion to another node in the same demotion tier as a fallback when the preferred demotion node is out of space). This demotion order is also inconsistent with the page allocation fallback order when all the nodes in a higher tier are out of space: The page allocation can fall back to any node from any lower tier, whereas the demotion order doesn't allow that currently. This patch adds support to get all the allowed demotion targets for a memory tier. demote_page_list() function is now modified to utilize this allowed node mask as the fallback allocation mask. Reviewed-by: "Huang, Ying" Signed-off-by: Jagdish Gediya Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V --- include/linux/memory-tiers.h | 12 ++++++++ mm/memory-tiers.c | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- mm/vmscan.c | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------- 3 files changed, 103 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/memory-tiers.h b/include/linux/memory-tiers.h index 108083d74557..a2f8f4c250b9 100644 --- a/include/linux/memory-tiers.h +++ b/include/linux/memory-tiers.h @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ #include #include #include +#include /* * Each tier cover a abstrace distance chunk size of 128 */ @@ -38,11 +39,17 @@ void init_node_memory_type(int node, struct memory_dev_type *default_type); void clear_node_memory_type(int node, struct memory_dev_type *memtype); #ifdef CONFIG_MIGRATION int next_demotion_node(int node); +void node_get_allowed_targets(pg_data_t *pgdat, nodemask_t *targets); #else static inline int next_demotion_node(int node) { return NUMA_NO_NODE; } + +static inline void node_get_allowed_targets(pg_data_t *pgdat, nodemask_t *targets) +{ + *targets = NODE_MASK_NONE; +} #endif #else @@ -75,5 +82,10 @@ static inline int next_demotion_node(int node) { return NUMA_NO_NODE; } + +static inline void node_get_allowed_targets(pg_data_t *pgdat, nodemask_t *targets) +{ + *targets = NODE_MASK_NONE; +} #endif /* CONFIG_NUMA */ #endif /* _LINUX_MEMORY_TIERS_H */ diff --git a/mm/memory-tiers.c b/mm/memory-tiers.c index 455c104fab5d..89b9f317be99 100644 --- a/mm/memory-tiers.c +++ b/mm/memory-tiers.c @@ -4,7 +4,6 @@ #include #include #include -#include #include #include "internal.h" @@ -20,6 +19,8 @@ struct memory_tier { * adistance_start .. adistance_start + MEMTIER_CHUNK_SIZE */ int adistance_start; + /* All the nodes that are part of all the lower memory tiers. */ + nodemask_t lower_tier_mask; }; struct demotion_nodes { @@ -156,6 +157,24 @@ static struct memory_tier *__node_get_memory_tier(int node) } #ifdef CONFIG_MIGRATION +void node_get_allowed_targets(pg_data_t *pgdat, nodemask_t *targets) +{ + struct memory_tier *memtier; + + /* + * pg_data_t.memtier updates includes a synchronize_rcu() + * which ensures that we either find NULL or a valid memtier + * in NODE_DATA. protect the access via rcu_read_lock(); + */ + rcu_read_lock(); + memtier = rcu_dereference(pgdat->memtier); + if (memtier) + *targets = memtier->lower_tier_mask; + else + *targets = NODE_MASK_NONE; + rcu_read_unlock(); +} + /** * next_demotion_node() - Get the next node in the demotion path * @node: The starting node to lookup the next node @@ -203,10 +222,19 @@ int next_demotion_node(int node) static void disable_all_demotion_targets(void) { + struct memory_tier *memtier; int node; - for_each_node_state(node, N_MEMORY) + for_each_node_state(node, N_MEMORY) { node_demotion[node].preferred = NODE_MASK_NONE; + /* + * We are holding memory_tier_lock, it is safe + * to access pgda->memtier. + */ + memtier = __node_get_memory_tier(node); + if (memtier) + memtier->lower_tier_mask = NODE_MASK_NONE; + } /* * Ensure that the "disable" is visible across the system. * Readers will see either a combination of before+disable @@ -238,7 +266,7 @@ static void establish_demotion_targets(void) struct demotion_nodes *nd; int target = NUMA_NO_NODE, node; int distance, best_distance; - nodemask_t tier_nodes; + nodemask_t tier_nodes, lower_tier; lockdep_assert_held_once(&memory_tier_lock); @@ -286,6 +314,23 @@ static void establish_demotion_targets(void) } } while (1); } + /* + * Now build the lower_tier mask for each node collecting node mask from + * all memory tier below it. This allows us to fallback demotion page + * allocation to a set of nodes that is closer the above selected + * perferred node. + */ + lower_tier = node_states[N_MEMORY]; + list_for_each_entry(memtier, &memory_tiers, list) { + /* + * Keep removing current tier from lower_tier nodes, + * This will remove all nodes in current and above + * memory tier from the lower_tier mask. + */ + tier_nodes = get_memtier_nodemask(memtier); + nodes_andnot(lower_tier, lower_tier, tier_nodes); + memtier->lower_tier_mask = lower_tier; + } } #else diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c index 224de380ac88..500b9054be18 100644 --- a/mm/vmscan.c +++ b/mm/vmscan.c @@ -1521,21 +1521,34 @@ static void folio_check_dirty_writeback(struct folio *folio, mapping->a_ops->is_dirty_writeback(folio, dirty, writeback); } -static struct page *alloc_demote_page(struct page *page, unsigned long node) +static struct page *alloc_demote_page(struct page *page, unsigned long private) { - struct migration_target_control mtc = { - /* - * Allocate from 'node', or fail quickly and quietly. - * When this happens, 'page' will likely just be discarded - * instead of migrated. - */ - .gfp_mask = (GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE & ~__GFP_RECLAIM) | - __GFP_THISNODE | __GFP_NOWARN | - __GFP_NOMEMALLOC | GFP_NOWAIT, - .nid = node - }; + struct page *target_page; + nodemask_t *allowed_mask; + struct migration_target_control *mtc; + + mtc = (struct migration_target_control *)private; + + allowed_mask = mtc->nmask; + /* + * make sure we allocate from the target node first also trying to + * demote or reclaim pages from the target node via kswapd if we are + * low on free memory on target node. If we don't do this and if + * we have free memory on the slower(lower) memtier, we would start + * allocating pages from slower(lower) memory tiers without even forcing + * a demotion of cold pages from the target memtier. This can result + * in the kernel placing hot pages in slower(lower) memory tiers. + */ + mtc->nmask = NULL; + mtc->gfp_mask |= __GFP_THISNODE; + target_page = alloc_migration_target(page, (unsigned long)mtc); + if (target_page) + return target_page; - return alloc_migration_target(page, (unsigned long)&mtc); + mtc->gfp_mask &= ~__GFP_THISNODE; + mtc->nmask = allowed_mask; + + return alloc_migration_target(page, (unsigned long)mtc); } /* @@ -1548,6 +1561,19 @@ static unsigned int demote_page_list(struct list_head *demote_pages, { int target_nid = next_demotion_node(pgdat->node_id); unsigned int nr_succeeded; + nodemask_t allowed_mask; + + struct migration_target_control mtc = { + /* + * Allocate from 'node', or fail quickly and quietly. + * When this happens, 'page' will likely just be discarded + * instead of migrated. + */ + .gfp_mask = (GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE & ~__GFP_RECLAIM) | __GFP_NOWARN | + __GFP_NOMEMALLOC | GFP_NOWAIT, + .nid = target_nid, + .nmask = &allowed_mask + }; if (list_empty(demote_pages)) return 0; @@ -1555,10 +1581,12 @@ static unsigned int demote_page_list(struct list_head *demote_pages, if (target_nid == NUMA_NO_NODE) return 0; + node_get_allowed_targets(pgdat, &allowed_mask); + /* Demotion ignores all cpuset and mempolicy settings */ migrate_pages(demote_pages, alloc_demote_page, NULL, - target_nid, MIGRATE_ASYNC, MR_DEMOTION, - &nr_succeeded); + (unsigned long)&mtc, MIGRATE_ASYNC, MR_DEMOTION, + &nr_succeeded); if (current_is_kswapd()) __count_vm_events(PGDEMOTE_KSWAPD, nr_succeeded);