Message ID | 20220920025123.2868953-6-liushixin2@huawei.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | mm: Use hotplug_memory_notifier() instead of register_hotmemory_notifier() | expand |
On 20.09.22 04:51, Liu Shixin wrote: > Since patch 316346243be6 has already updated the minimum gcc version to 5.1. > The previous problem mentioned in patch f02c69680088 is not existed. So we > can now revert to use hotplug_memory_notifier() directly rather than > register_hotmemory_notifier(). > > Signed-off-by: Liu Shixin <liushixin2@huawei.com> > --- Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
diff --git a/mm/mm_init.c b/mm/mm_init.c index 0d7b2bd2454a..44aadc162d1f 100644 --- a/mm/mm_init.c +++ b/mm/mm_init.c @@ -178,16 +178,10 @@ static int __meminit mm_compute_batch_notifier(struct notifier_block *self, return NOTIFY_OK; } -static struct notifier_block compute_batch_nb __meminitdata = { - .notifier_call = mm_compute_batch_notifier, - .priority = IPC_CALLBACK_PRI, /* use lowest priority */ -}; - static int __init mm_compute_batch_init(void) { mm_compute_batch(sysctl_overcommit_memory); - register_hotmemory_notifier(&compute_batch_nb); - + hotplug_memory_notifier(mm_compute_batch_notifier, IPC_CALLBACK_PRI); return 0; }
Since patch 316346243be6 has already updated the minimum gcc version to 5.1. The previous problem mentioned in patch f02c69680088 is not existed. So we can now revert to use hotplug_memory_notifier() directly rather than register_hotmemory_notifier(). Signed-off-by: Liu Shixin <liushixin2@huawei.com> --- mm/mm_init.c | 8 +------- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-)