Message ID | 20220926130341.253039-2-zhaogongyi@huawei.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | Optimize and bugfix for memory-hotplug | expand |
On 26.09.22 15:03, Zhao Gongyi wrote: > Add checking for online_memory_expect_success()/ > offline_memory_expect_success()/offline_memory_expect_fail(), or > the test would exit 0 although the functions return 1. > > Signed-off-by: Zhao Gongyi <zhaogongyi@huawei.com> > --- > .../selftests/memory-hotplug/mem-on-off-test.sh | 15 ++++++++++++--- > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/memory-hotplug/mem-on-off-test.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/memory-hotplug/mem-on-off-test.sh > index 46a97f318f58..3edda1f13f7b 100755 > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/memory-hotplug/mem-on-off-test.sh > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/memory-hotplug/mem-on-off-test.sh > @@ -266,7 +266,10 @@ done > # > echo $error > $NOTIFIER_ERR_INJECT_DIR/actions/MEM_GOING_ONLINE/error > for memory in `hotpluggable_offline_memory`; do > - online_memory_expect_fail $memory > + online_memory_expect_fail $memory || { > + echo "online memory $memory: unexpected success" The functions themself already print an error, isn't it sufficient to set retval=1? > + retval=1 > + } > done > > # > @@ -274,7 +277,10 @@ done > # > echo 0 > $NOTIFIER_ERR_INJECT_DIR/actions/MEM_GOING_ONLINE/error > for memory in `hotpluggable_offline_memory`; do > - online_memory_expect_success $memory > + online_memory_expect_success $memory || { > + echo "online memory $memory: unexpected fail" > + retval=1 > + } > done > > # > @@ -283,7 +289,10 @@ done > echo $error > $NOTIFIER_ERR_INJECT_DIR/actions/MEM_GOING_OFFLINE/error > for memory in `hotpluggable_online_memory`; do > if [ $((RANDOM % 100)) -lt $ratio ]; then > - offline_memory_expect_fail $memory > + offline_memory_expect_fail $memory || { > + echo "offline memory $memory: unexpected success" > + retval=1 > + } These functions return 0 if the result is as expected and 1 if the result is unexpected. ... but wouldn't we evaluate the right hand side only if the result is "0" -- expected? I might be wrong. Wouldn't it be simpler do it as in "Online all hot-pluggable memory again" if ! online_memory_expect_success $memory; then retval=1 fi (similarly adjusting the function name)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/memory-hotplug/mem-on-off-test.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/memory-hotplug/mem-on-off-test.sh index 46a97f318f58..3edda1f13f7b 100755 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/memory-hotplug/mem-on-off-test.sh +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/memory-hotplug/mem-on-off-test.sh @@ -266,7 +266,10 @@ done # echo $error > $NOTIFIER_ERR_INJECT_DIR/actions/MEM_GOING_ONLINE/error for memory in `hotpluggable_offline_memory`; do - online_memory_expect_fail $memory + online_memory_expect_fail $memory || { + echo "online memory $memory: unexpected success" + retval=1 + } done # @@ -274,7 +277,10 @@ done # echo 0 > $NOTIFIER_ERR_INJECT_DIR/actions/MEM_GOING_ONLINE/error for memory in `hotpluggable_offline_memory`; do - online_memory_expect_success $memory + online_memory_expect_success $memory || { + echo "online memory $memory: unexpected fail" + retval=1 + } done # @@ -283,7 +289,10 @@ done echo $error > $NOTIFIER_ERR_INJECT_DIR/actions/MEM_GOING_OFFLINE/error for memory in `hotpluggable_online_memory`; do if [ $((RANDOM % 100)) -lt $ratio ]; then - offline_memory_expect_fail $memory + offline_memory_expect_fail $memory || { + echo "offline memory $memory: unexpected success" + retval=1 + } fi done
Add checking for online_memory_expect_success()/ offline_memory_expect_success()/offline_memory_expect_fail(), or the test would exit 0 although the functions return 1. Signed-off-by: Zhao Gongyi <zhaogongyi@huawei.com> --- .../selftests/memory-hotplug/mem-on-off-test.sh | 15 ++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) -- 2.17.1