diff mbox series

[v3,3/3] selftests: cgroup: make sure reclaim target memcg is unprotected

Message ID 20221202031512.1365483-4-yosryahmed@google.com (mailing list archive)
State New
Headers show
Series mm: memcg: fix protection of reclaim target memcg | expand

Commit Message

Yosry Ahmed Dec. 2, 2022, 3:15 a.m. UTC 
Make sure that we ignore protection of a memcg that is the target of
memcg reclaim.

Signed-off-by: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_memcontrol.c | 11 +++++++++++
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_memcontrol.c b/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_memcontrol.c
index a8f4700353a4..1e616a8c6a9c 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_memcontrol.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_memcontrol.c
@@ -238,6 +238,8 @@  static int cg_test_proc_killed(const char *cgroup)
 	return -1;
 }
 
+static bool reclaim_until(const char *memcg, long goal);
+
 /*
  * First, this test creates the following hierarchy:
  * A       memory.min = 0,    memory.max = 200M
@@ -266,6 +268,12 @@  static int cg_test_proc_killed(const char *cgroup)
  * unprotected memory in A available, and checks that:
  * a) memory.min protects pagecache even in this case,
  * b) memory.low allows reclaiming page cache with low events.
+ *
+ * Then we try to reclaim from A/B/C using memory.reclaim until its
+ * usage reaches 10M.
+ * This makes sure that:
+ * (a) We ignore the protection of the reclaim target memcg.
+ * (b) The previously calculated emin value (~29M) should be dismissed.
  */
 static int test_memcg_protection(const char *root, bool min)
 {
@@ -385,6 +393,9 @@  static int test_memcg_protection(const char *root, bool min)
 	if (!values_close(cg_read_long(parent[1], "memory.current"), MB(50), 3))
 		goto cleanup;
 
+	if (!reclaim_until(children[0], MB(10)))
+		goto cleanup;
+
 	if (min) {
 		ret = KSFT_PASS;
 		goto cleanup;