From patchwork Thu Jan 19 21:22:58 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Rick Edgecombe X-Patchwork-Id: 13108798 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91533C46467 for ; Thu, 19 Jan 2023 21:24:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 4DC19900005; Thu, 19 Jan 2023 16:24:00 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 43F6B900002; Thu, 19 Jan 2023 16:24:00 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 1CC55900005; Thu, 19 Jan 2023 16:24:00 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0013.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.13]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02105900002 for ; Thu, 19 Jan 2023 16:24:00 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin29.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay05.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE10F409D2 for ; Thu, 19 Jan 2023 21:23:59 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 80372826198.29.406BC5E Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93]) by imf16.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7F19180010 for ; Thu, 19 Jan 2023 21:23:57 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: imf16.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=Qd4w3FiI; spf=pass (imf16.hostedemail.com: domain of rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com designates 192.55.52.93 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=intel.com ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; t=1674163438; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:dkim-signature; bh=YWVE+Ni8aNDtLo7tgyffJpW9kI97N/rM06lnRUBkkSk=; b=yUv6edfnPpX9JHMq0Kbl7FWQCRs1IuGESW3AgaTPxG4199ekW8ZKy77w7QzApdeD/G2kvU wqv4Vh1mQVmGKrQ0A1bZDJ/1Q1u8RPxaWeI5w/pZpFMckjxgIh06z28rMeb/tWx/y1IfoM X4FjkTHQZ/2PGaLTOqJq3D9mQMlydN0= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; imf16.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=Qd4w3FiI; spf=pass (imf16.hostedemail.com: domain of rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com designates 192.55.52.93 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=intel.com ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-20220608; d=hostedemail.com; t=1674163438; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=6YgOP35XmwOBnPuIcU7+ukk7bIIpaZkD6A8jFTeyOkTnpMzWzeUYW9wJoma/z7o9ks9s0f Df9PKQLAqMRzrgCCbZbWrjva56zTwV5rcg1KjJ1MV8YmHihTgNfYhRwtyEvp9z7jmy2o9J sCcFDWsCZ2vCqejZMR5mR2BxaUHFGNg= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1674163437; x=1705699437; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: references; bh=+3N34QEERZNcvQNJAARc1au4ZPtrpENbiq/H3U3EHgE=; b=Qd4w3FiIkTcGjfGVzZ4mHGfPY+JXQCmc3Ab1W00CzHm/dFnWN3DuvDbz M8Np47kLoaZeHmsEexJ/CKxO45oynaFr+XI8a3r6pFPcPU5+w9eLt9cW4 M3j6JGn6VO6cCRAtrbtSCLIvR92pbcDXoACWK9OD5xLrWsGpdSad8BCzh P/0JXafqUbaOhr2KTX7eMilbAuvx+zuDHidNLfgh8AwPj0ECmjb4MB0oI wH55JpSJqaQ2UWwJ+jGiFo14Tbd6FhZ6ULTySibRHFb1g3T9FnElzhOlF YDfzR4wulfHzkcSkip56Xyqs7+F9LAJJcW5diuc3CHTI552DLwTDs+6tn w==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10595"; a="323119638" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.97,230,1669104000"; d="scan'208";a="323119638" Received: from fmsmga005.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.32]) by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 19 Jan 2023 13:23:57 -0800 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10595"; a="989139093" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.97,230,1669104000"; d="scan'208";a="989139093" Received: from hossain3-mobl.amr.corp.intel.com (HELO rpedgeco-desk.amr.corp.intel.com) ([10.252.128.187]) by fmsmga005-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 19 Jan 2023 13:23:55 -0800 From: Rick Edgecombe To: x86@kernel.org, "H . Peter Anvin" , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , Andy Lutomirski , Balbir Singh , Borislav Petkov , Cyrill Gorcunov , Dave Hansen , Eugene Syromiatnikov , Florian Weimer , "H . J . Lu" , Jann Horn , Jonathan Corbet , Kees Cook , Mike Kravetz , Nadav Amit , Oleg Nesterov , Pavel Machek , Peter Zijlstra , Randy Dunlap , Weijiang Yang , "Kirill A . Shutemov" , John Allen , kcc@google.com, eranian@google.com, rppt@kernel.org, jamorris@linux.microsoft.com, dethoma@microsoft.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, Andrew.Cooper3@citrix.com, christina.schimpe@intel.com Cc: rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com, Yu-cheng Yu Subject: [PATCH v5 20/39] mm: Add guard pages around a shadow stack. Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2023 13:22:58 -0800 Message-Id: <20230119212317.8324-21-rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20230119212317.8324-1-rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com> References: <20230119212317.8324-1-rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com> X-Rspamd-Server: rspam05 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: C7F19180010 X-Stat-Signature: zh177x1cajtf5p7safpzhfa7rxcd4orj X-Rspam-User: X-HE-Tag: 1674163437-508952 X-HE-Meta: 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 nxuHi4I+ T+D5+zgQONJ7zaP5G1I6GJdobV2J+tV2O6cCyZLmRHBhy9DPiMVEUPpaPeNxiJPrO08pt5x9IgktPAiBt+ohtigwh5pFgd2sK8rnFImH+DWje4qWIcPKNiygFBUDuXDU2AGHX5NwZuo3QMgGtfyFyo6WvF1kwRXURsmYtkMt4vlyEOL8A4fo9ka39uwmNZzHTq8bI2M+QYXKEbjWdt4KgAzclHoIfJY7TCrZa4u7jN2FMF9ioqah7YvhnHxmkOUhMUOUWhJ5BQ2hsCJDz7dkhbxSblQmLC3wlc6DU X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: From: Yu-cheng Yu The x86 Control-flow Enforcement Technology (CET) feature includes a new type of memory called shadow stack. This shadow stack memory has some unusual properties, which requires some core mm changes to function properly. The architecture of shadow stack constrains the ability of userspace to move the shadow stack pointer (SSP) in order to prevent corrupting or switching to other shadow stacks. The RSTORSSP can move the ssp to different shadow stacks, but it requires a specially placed token in order to do this. However, the architecture does not prevent incrementing the stack pointer to wander onto an adjacent shadow stack. To prevent this in software, enforce guard pages at the beginning of shadow stack vmas, such that there will always be a gap between adjacent shadow stacks. Make the gap big enough so that no userspace SSP changing operations (besides RSTORSSP), can move the SSP from one stack to the next. The SSP can increment or decrement by CALL, RET and INCSSP. CALL and RET can move the SSP by a maximum of 8 bytes, at which point the shadow stack would be accessed. The INCSSP instruction can also increment the shadow stack pointer. It is the shadow stack analog of an instruction like: addq $0x80, %rsp However, there is one important difference between an ADD on %rsp and INCSSP. In addition to modifying SSP, INCSSP also reads from the memory of the first and last elements that were "popped". It can be thought of as acting like this: READ_ONCE(ssp); // read+discard top element on stack ssp += nr_to_pop * 8; // move the shadow stack READ_ONCE(ssp-8); // read+discard last popped stack element The maximum distance INCSSP can move the SSP is 2040 bytes, before it would read the memory. Therefore a single page gap will be enough to prevent any operation from shifting the SSP to an adjacent stack, since it would have to land in the gap at least once, causing a fault. This could be accomplished by using VM_GROWSDOWN, but this has a downside. The behavior would allow shadow stack's to grow, which is unneeded and adds a strange difference to how most regular stacks work. Tested-by: Pengfei Xu Tested-by: John Allen Signed-off-by: Yu-cheng Yu Co-developed-by: Rick Edgecombe Signed-off-by: Rick Edgecombe Cc: Kees Cook --- v5: - Fix typo in commit log v4: - Drop references to 32 bit instructions - Switch to generic code to drop __weak (Peterz) v2: - Use __weak instead of #ifdef (Dave Hansen) - Only have start gap on shadow stack (Andy Luto) - Create stack_guard_start_gap() to not duplicate code in an arch version of vm_start_gap() (Dave Hansen) - Improve commit log partly with verbiage from (Dave Hansen) Yu-cheng v25: - Move SHADOW_STACK_GUARD_GAP to arch/x86/mm/mmap.c. include/linux/mm.h | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h index 139a682d243b..3f980d4823ad 100644 --- a/include/linux/mm.h +++ b/include/linux/mm.h @@ -2987,15 +2987,36 @@ struct vm_area_struct *vma_lookup(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr) return mtree_load(&mm->mm_mt, addr); } +static inline unsigned long stack_guard_start_gap(struct vm_area_struct *vma) +{ + if (vma->vm_flags & VM_GROWSDOWN) + return stack_guard_gap; + + /* + * Shadow stack pointer is moved by CALL, RET, and INCSSPQ. + * INCSSPQ moves shadow stack pointer up to 255 * 8 = ~2 KB + * and touches the first and the last element in the range, which + * triggers a page fault if the range is not in a shadow stack. + * Because of this, creating 4-KB guard pages around a shadow + * stack prevents these instructions from going beyond. + * + * Creation of VM_SHADOW_STACK is tightly controlled, so a vma + * can't be both VM_GROWSDOWN and VM_SHADOW_STACK + */ + if (vma->vm_flags & VM_SHADOW_STACK) + return PAGE_SIZE; + + return 0; +} + static inline unsigned long vm_start_gap(struct vm_area_struct *vma) { + unsigned long gap = stack_guard_start_gap(vma); unsigned long vm_start = vma->vm_start; - if (vma->vm_flags & VM_GROWSDOWN) { - vm_start -= stack_guard_gap; - if (vm_start > vma->vm_start) - vm_start = 0; - } + vm_start -= gap; + if (vm_start > vma->vm_start) + vm_start = 0; return vm_start; }