Message ID | 20230625021323.849147-1-linmiaohe@huawei.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | [v2] mm/mm_init.c: remove obsolete macro HASH_SMALL | expand |
On Sun, Jun 25, 2023 at 10:13:23AM +0800, Miaohe Lin wrote: > HASH_SMALL only works when parameter numentries is 0. But the sole caller > futex_init() never calls alloc_large_system_hash() with numentries set to > 0. So HASH_SMALL is obsolete and remove it. > > Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@kernel.org> > --- > v2: > update HASH_ZERO to 0x2 per Mike > --- > include/linux/memblock.h | 4 +--- > kernel/futex/core.c | 3 +-- > mm/mm_init.c | 10 +--------- > 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/linux/memblock.h b/include/linux/memblock.h > index f71ff9f0ec81..0d031fbfea25 100644 > --- a/include/linux/memblock.h > +++ b/include/linux/memblock.h > @@ -581,9 +581,7 @@ extern void *alloc_large_system_hash(const char *tablename, > unsigned long high_limit); > > #define HASH_EARLY 0x00000001 /* Allocating during early boot? */ > -#define HASH_SMALL 0x00000002 /* sub-page allocation allowed, min > - * shift passed via *_hash_shift */ > -#define HASH_ZERO 0x00000004 /* Zero allocated hash table */ > +#define HASH_ZERO 0x00000002 /* Zero allocated hash table */ > > /* Only NUMA needs hash distribution. 64bit NUMA architectures have > * sufficient vmalloc space. > diff --git a/kernel/futex/core.c b/kernel/futex/core.c > index 514e4582b863..f10587d1d481 100644 > --- a/kernel/futex/core.c > +++ b/kernel/futex/core.c > @@ -1132,8 +1132,7 @@ static int __init futex_init(void) > #endif > > futex_queues = alloc_large_system_hash("futex", sizeof(*futex_queues), > - futex_hashsize, 0, > - futex_hashsize < 256 ? HASH_SMALL : 0, > + futex_hashsize, 0, 0, > &futex_shift, NULL, > futex_hashsize, futex_hashsize); > futex_hashsize = 1UL << futex_shift; > diff --git a/mm/mm_init.c b/mm/mm_init.c > index a1963c3322af..999723dee8cc 100644 > --- a/mm/mm_init.c > +++ b/mm/mm_init.c > @@ -2490,15 +2490,7 @@ void *__init alloc_large_system_hash(const char *tablename, > else > numentries <<= (PAGE_SHIFT - scale); > > - /* Make sure we've got at least a 0-order allocation.. */ > - if (unlikely(flags & HASH_SMALL)) { > - /* Makes no sense without HASH_EARLY */ > - WARN_ON(!(flags & HASH_EARLY)); > - if (!(numentries >> *_hash_shift)) { > - numentries = 1UL << *_hash_shift; > - BUG_ON(!numentries); > - } > - } else if (unlikely((numentries * bucketsize) < PAGE_SIZE)) > + if (unlikely((numentries * bucketsize) < PAGE_SIZE)) > numentries = PAGE_SIZE / bucketsize; > } > numentries = roundup_pow_of_two(numentries); > -- > 2.27.0 >
diff --git a/include/linux/memblock.h b/include/linux/memblock.h index f71ff9f0ec81..0d031fbfea25 100644 --- a/include/linux/memblock.h +++ b/include/linux/memblock.h @@ -581,9 +581,7 @@ extern void *alloc_large_system_hash(const char *tablename, unsigned long high_limit); #define HASH_EARLY 0x00000001 /* Allocating during early boot? */ -#define HASH_SMALL 0x00000002 /* sub-page allocation allowed, min - * shift passed via *_hash_shift */ -#define HASH_ZERO 0x00000004 /* Zero allocated hash table */ +#define HASH_ZERO 0x00000002 /* Zero allocated hash table */ /* Only NUMA needs hash distribution. 64bit NUMA architectures have * sufficient vmalloc space. diff --git a/kernel/futex/core.c b/kernel/futex/core.c index 514e4582b863..f10587d1d481 100644 --- a/kernel/futex/core.c +++ b/kernel/futex/core.c @@ -1132,8 +1132,7 @@ static int __init futex_init(void) #endif futex_queues = alloc_large_system_hash("futex", sizeof(*futex_queues), - futex_hashsize, 0, - futex_hashsize < 256 ? HASH_SMALL : 0, + futex_hashsize, 0, 0, &futex_shift, NULL, futex_hashsize, futex_hashsize); futex_hashsize = 1UL << futex_shift; diff --git a/mm/mm_init.c b/mm/mm_init.c index a1963c3322af..999723dee8cc 100644 --- a/mm/mm_init.c +++ b/mm/mm_init.c @@ -2490,15 +2490,7 @@ void *__init alloc_large_system_hash(const char *tablename, else numentries <<= (PAGE_SHIFT - scale); - /* Make sure we've got at least a 0-order allocation.. */ - if (unlikely(flags & HASH_SMALL)) { - /* Makes no sense without HASH_EARLY */ - WARN_ON(!(flags & HASH_EARLY)); - if (!(numentries >> *_hash_shift)) { - numentries = 1UL << *_hash_shift; - BUG_ON(!numentries); - } - } else if (unlikely((numentries * bucketsize) < PAGE_SIZE)) + if (unlikely((numentries * bucketsize) < PAGE_SIZE)) numentries = PAGE_SIZE / bucketsize; } numentries = roundup_pow_of_two(numentries);
HASH_SMALL only works when parameter numentries is 0. But the sole caller futex_init() never calls alloc_large_system_hash() with numentries set to 0. So HASH_SMALL is obsolete and remove it. Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com> --- v2: update HASH_ZERO to 0x2 per Mike --- include/linux/memblock.h | 4 +--- kernel/futex/core.c | 3 +-- mm/mm_init.c | 10 +--------- 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)