Message ID | 20230717131004.12662-4-yangyicong@huawei.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | arm64: support batched/deferred tlb shootdown during page reclamation/migration | expand |
On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 09:10:03PM +0800, Yicong Yang wrote: > From: Yicong Yang <yangyicong@hisilicon.com> > > Currently we'll flush the mm in flush_tlb_batched_pending() to > avoid race between reclaim unmaps pages by batched TLB flush > and mprotect/munmap/etc. Other architectures like arm64 may > only need a synchronization barrier(dsb) here rather than > a full mm flush. So add arch_flush_tlb_batched_pending() to > allow an arch-specific implementation here. This intends no > functional changes on x86 since still a full mm flush for > x86. > > Signed-off-by: Yicong Yang <yangyicong@hisilicon.com> Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h index 1c7d3a36e16c..837e4a50281a 100644 --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h @@ -284,6 +284,11 @@ static inline void arch_tlbbatch_add_pending(struct arch_tlbflush_unmap_batch *b cpumask_or(&batch->cpumask, &batch->cpumask, mm_cpumask(mm)); } +static inline void arch_flush_tlb_batched_pending(struct mm_struct *mm) +{ + flush_tlb_mm(mm); +} + extern void arch_tlbbatch_flush(struct arch_tlbflush_unmap_batch *batch); static inline bool pte_flags_need_flush(unsigned long oldflags, diff --git a/mm/rmap.c b/mm/rmap.c index 9699c6011b0e..3a16c91be7e2 100644 --- a/mm/rmap.c +++ b/mm/rmap.c @@ -717,7 +717,7 @@ void flush_tlb_batched_pending(struct mm_struct *mm) int flushed = batch >> TLB_FLUSH_BATCH_FLUSHED_SHIFT; if (pending != flushed) { - flush_tlb_mm(mm); + arch_flush_tlb_batched_pending(mm); /* * If the new TLB flushing is pending during flushing, leave * mm->tlb_flush_batched as is, to avoid losing flushing.