@@ -2502,7 +2502,7 @@ int unpoison_memory(unsigned long pfn)
{
struct folio *folio;
struct page *p;
- int ret = -EBUSY;
+ int ret = -EBUSY, ghp;
unsigned long count = 1;
bool huge = false;
static DEFINE_RATELIMIT_STATE(unpoison_rs, DEFAULT_RATELIMIT_INTERVAL,
@@ -2550,29 +2550,28 @@ int unpoison_memory(unsigned long pfn)
if (folio_test_slab(folio) || PageTable(&folio->page) || folio_test_reserved(folio))
goto unlock_mutex;
- ret = get_hwpoison_page(p, MF_UNPOISON);
- if (!ret) {
+ ghp = get_hwpoison_page(p, MF_UNPOISON);
+ if (!ghp) {
if (PageHuge(p)) {
huge = true;
count = folio_free_raw_hwp(folio, false);
- if (count == 0) {
- ret = -EBUSY;
+ if (count == 0)
goto unlock_mutex;
- }
}
ret = folio_test_clear_hwpoison(folio) ? 0 : -EBUSY;
- } else if (ret < 0) {
- if (ret == -EHWPOISON) {
+ } else if (ghp < 0) {
+ if (ghp == -EHWPOISON) {
ret = put_page_back_buddy(p) ? 0 : -EBUSY;
- } else
+ } else {
+ ret = ghp;
unpoison_pr_info("Unpoison: failed to grab page %#lx\n",
pfn, &unpoison_rs);
+ }
} else {
if (PageHuge(p)) {
huge = true;
count = folio_free_raw_hwp(folio, false);
if (count == 0) {
- ret = -EBUSY;
folio_put(folio);
goto unlock_mutex;
}
If unpoison_memory() fails to clear page hwpoisoned flag, return value ret is expected to be -EBUSY. But when get_hwpoison_page() returns 1 and fails to clear page hwpoisoned flag due to races, return value will be unexpected 1 leading to users being confused. And there's a code smell that the variable "ret" is used not only to save the return value of unpoison_memory(), but also the return value from get_hwpoison_page(). Make a further cleanup by using another auto-variable solely to save the return value of get_hwpoison_page() as suggested by Naoya. Fixes: bf181c582588 ("mm/hwpoison: fix unpoison_memory()") Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com> --- mm/memory-failure.c | 19 +++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)