diff mbox series

[v2] mm/memcg: fix obsolete function name in mem_cgroup_protection()

Message ID 20230727115934.657787-1-linmiaohe@huawei.com (mailing list archive)
State New
Headers show
Series [v2] mm/memcg: fix obsolete function name in mem_cgroup_protection() | expand

Commit Message

Miaohe Lin July 27, 2023, 11:59 a.m. UTC 
Commit 45c7f7e1ef17 ("mm, memcg: decouple e{low,min} state mutations from
protection checks") changed the function name but not the corresponding
comment.

Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
---
 include/linux/memcontrol.h | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/include/linux/memcontrol.h b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
index e765d1ff9cbb..3bd00f224224 100644
--- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h
+++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
@@ -585,7 +585,7 @@  static inline void mem_cgroup_protection(struct mem_cgroup *root,
 	/*
 	 * There is no reclaim protection applied to a targeted reclaim.
 	 * We are special casing this specific case here because
-	 * mem_cgroup_protected calculation is not robust enough to keep
+	 * mem_cgroup_calculate_protection is not robust enough to keep
 	 * the protection invariant for calculated effective values for
 	 * parallel reclaimers with different reclaim target. This is
 	 * especially a problem for tail memcgs (as they have pages on LRU)