Message ID | 20230920190117.784151-3-shr@devkernel.io (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | mm/ksm: add fork-exec support for prctl | expand |
On 20.09.23 21:01, Stefan Roesch wrote: > This adds a new test case to the ksm functional tests to make sure that > the KSM setting is inherited by the child process when doing a > fork/exec. > > Signed-off-by: Stefan Roesch <shr@devkernel.io> > --- > .../selftests/mm/ksm_functional_tests.c | 67 ++++++++++++++++++- > 1 file changed, 66 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/ksm_functional_tests.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/ksm_functional_tests.c > index 901e950f9138..40b86c9caf3a 100644 > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/ksm_functional_tests.c > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/ksm_functional_tests.c > @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ > > #define KiB 1024u > #define MiB (1024 * KiB) > +#define FORK_EXEC_CHILD_PRG_NAME "ksm_fork_exec_child" > > static int mem_fd; > static int ksm_fd; > @@ -479,6 +480,65 @@ static void test_prctl_fork(void) > ksft_test_result_pass("PR_SET_MEMORY_MERGE value is inherited\n"); > } > > +static int ksm_fork_exec_child(void) > +{ > + /* Test if KSM is enabled for the process. */ > + int ksm = prctl(PR_GET_MEMORY_MERGE, 0, 0, 0, 0); > + return ksm == 1; You can simply do "return prctl(PR_GET_MEMORY_MERGE, 0, 0, 0, 0) == 1;" Or maybe even "return prctl(PR_GET_MEMORY_MERGE, 0, 0, 0, 0);" and adjust the comparison below in the caller. > +} > + > +static void test_prctl_fork_exec(void) > +{ > + int ret, status; > + pid_t child_pid; > + > + ksft_print_msg("[RUN] %s\n", __func__); > + > + ret = prctl(PR_SET_MEMORY_MERGE, 1, 0, 0, 0); > + if (ret < 0 && errno == EINVAL) { > + ksft_test_result_skip("PR_SET_MEMORY_MERGE not supported\n"); > + return; > + } else if (ret) { > + ksft_test_result_fail("PR_SET_MEMORY_MERGE=1 failed\n"); > + return; > + } > + > + child_pid = fork(); > + if (child_pid == -1) { > + ksft_test_result_skip("fork() failed\n"); > + return; > + } else if (child_pid == 0) { > + char *prg_name = "./ksm_functional_tests"; > + char *argv_for_program[] = { prg_name, FORK_EXEC_CHILD_PRG_NAME }; > + I'd simply have used the magic number "1" or so. But this works as well. Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> writes: > On 20.09.23 21:01, Stefan Roesch wrote: >> This adds a new test case to the ksm functional tests to make sure that >> the KSM setting is inherited by the child process when doing a >> fork/exec. >> Signed-off-by: Stefan Roesch <shr@devkernel.io> >> --- >> .../selftests/mm/ksm_functional_tests.c | 67 ++++++++++++++++++- >> 1 file changed, 66 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/ksm_functional_tests.c >> b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/ksm_functional_tests.c >> index 901e950f9138..40b86c9caf3a 100644 >> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/ksm_functional_tests.c >> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/ksm_functional_tests.c >> @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ >> #define KiB 1024u >> #define MiB (1024 * KiB) >> +#define FORK_EXEC_CHILD_PRG_NAME "ksm_fork_exec_child" >> static int mem_fd; >> static int ksm_fd; >> @@ -479,6 +480,65 @@ static void test_prctl_fork(void) >> ksft_test_result_pass("PR_SET_MEMORY_MERGE value is inherited\n"); >> } >> +static int ksm_fork_exec_child(void) >> +{ >> + /* Test if KSM is enabled for the process. */ >> + int ksm = prctl(PR_GET_MEMORY_MERGE, 0, 0, 0, 0); >> + return ksm == 1; > > You can simply do "return prctl(PR_GET_MEMORY_MERGE, 0, 0, 0, 0) == 1;" > > Or maybe even "return prctl(PR_GET_MEMORY_MERGE, 0, 0, 0, 0);" and adjust the > comparison below in the caller. > I'll use the first one, then its all in one place. >> +} >> + >> +static void test_prctl_fork_exec(void) >> +{ >> + int ret, status; >> + pid_t child_pid; >> + >> + ksft_print_msg("[RUN] %s\n", __func__); >> + >> + ret = prctl(PR_SET_MEMORY_MERGE, 1, 0, 0, 0); >> + if (ret < 0 && errno == EINVAL) { >> + ksft_test_result_skip("PR_SET_MEMORY_MERGE not supported\n"); >> + return; >> + } else if (ret) { >> + ksft_test_result_fail("PR_SET_MEMORY_MERGE=1 failed\n"); >> + return; >> + } >> + >> + child_pid = fork(); >> + if (child_pid == -1) { >> + ksft_test_result_skip("fork() failed\n"); >> + return; >> + } else if (child_pid == 0) { >> + char *prg_name = "./ksm_functional_tests"; >> + char *argv_for_program[] = { prg_name, FORK_EXEC_CHILD_PRG_NAME }; >> + > > I'd simply have used the magic number "1" or so. But this works as well. > I think the current one makes it easier in case we have to add a second one later. > Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/ksm_functional_tests.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/ksm_functional_tests.c index 901e950f9138..40b86c9caf3a 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/ksm_functional_tests.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/ksm_functional_tests.c @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ #define KiB 1024u #define MiB (1024 * KiB) +#define FORK_EXEC_CHILD_PRG_NAME "ksm_fork_exec_child" static int mem_fd; static int ksm_fd; @@ -479,6 +480,65 @@ static void test_prctl_fork(void) ksft_test_result_pass("PR_SET_MEMORY_MERGE value is inherited\n"); } +static int ksm_fork_exec_child(void) +{ + /* Test if KSM is enabled for the process. */ + int ksm = prctl(PR_GET_MEMORY_MERGE, 0, 0, 0, 0); + return ksm == 1; +} + +static void test_prctl_fork_exec(void) +{ + int ret, status; + pid_t child_pid; + + ksft_print_msg("[RUN] %s\n", __func__); + + ret = prctl(PR_SET_MEMORY_MERGE, 1, 0, 0, 0); + if (ret < 0 && errno == EINVAL) { + ksft_test_result_skip("PR_SET_MEMORY_MERGE not supported\n"); + return; + } else if (ret) { + ksft_test_result_fail("PR_SET_MEMORY_MERGE=1 failed\n"); + return; + } + + child_pid = fork(); + if (child_pid == -1) { + ksft_test_result_skip("fork() failed\n"); + return; + } else if (child_pid == 0) { + char *prg_name = "./ksm_functional_tests"; + char *argv_for_program[] = { prg_name, FORK_EXEC_CHILD_PRG_NAME }; + + execv(prg_name, argv_for_program); + return; + } + + if (waitpid(child_pid, &status, 0) > 0) { + if (WIFEXITED(status)) { + status = WEXITSTATUS(status); + if (status) { + ksft_test_result_fail("KSM not enabled\n"); + return; + } + } else { + ksft_test_result_fail("program didn't terminate normally\n"); + return; + } + } else { + ksft_test_result_fail("waitpid() failed\n"); + return; + } + + if (prctl(PR_SET_MEMORY_MERGE, 0, 0, 0, 0)) { + ksft_test_result_fail("PR_SET_MEMORY_MERGE=0 failed\n"); + return; + } + + ksft_test_result_pass("PR_SET_MEMORY_MERGE value is inherited\n"); +} + static void test_prctl_unmerge(void) { const unsigned int size = 2 * MiB; @@ -536,9 +596,13 @@ static void test_prot_none(void) int main(int argc, char **argv) { - unsigned int tests = 7; + unsigned int tests = 8; int err; + if (argc > 1 && !strcmp(argv[1], FORK_EXEC_CHILD_PRG_NAME)) { + exit(ksm_fork_exec_child() == 1 ? 0 : 1); + } + #ifdef __NR_userfaultfd tests++; #endif @@ -576,6 +640,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv) test_prctl(); test_prctl_fork(); + test_prctl_fork_exec(); test_prctl_unmerge(); err = ksft_get_fail_cnt();
This adds a new test case to the ksm functional tests to make sure that the KSM setting is inherited by the child process when doing a fork/exec. Signed-off-by: Stefan Roesch <shr@devkernel.io> --- .../selftests/mm/ksm_functional_tests.c | 67 ++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 66 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)