diff mbox series

[10/10] afs: Fix missing/incorrect unlocking of RCU read lock

Message ID 20240122123845.3822570-11-dhowells@redhat.com (mailing list archive)
State New
Headers show
Series netfs, afs, cifs, cachefiles, erofs: Miscellaneous fixes | expand

Commit Message

David Howells Jan. 22, 2024, 12:38 p.m. UTC 
In afs_proc_addr_prefs_show(), we need to unlock the RCU read lock in both
places before returning (and not lock it again).

Fixes: f94f70d39cc2 ("afs: Provide a way to configure address priorities")
Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202401172243.cd53d5f6-oliver.sang@intel.com
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org
cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
---
 fs/afs/proc.c | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/fs/afs/proc.c b/fs/afs/proc.c
index 3bd02571f30d..15eab053af6d 100644
--- a/fs/afs/proc.c
+++ b/fs/afs/proc.c
@@ -166,7 +166,7 @@  static int afs_proc_addr_prefs_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
 
 	if (!preflist) {
 		seq_puts(m, "NO PREFS\n");
-		return 0;
+		goto out;
 	}
 
 	seq_printf(m, "PROT SUBNET                                      PRIOR (v=%u n=%u/%u/%u)\n",
@@ -191,7 +191,8 @@  static int afs_proc_addr_prefs_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
 		}
 	}
 
-	rcu_read_lock();
+out:
+	rcu_read_unlock();
 	return 0;
 }