@@ -95,21 +95,22 @@ int check_compaction(unsigned long mem_free, unsigned int hugepage_size)
fd = open("/proc/sys/vm/nr_hugepages", O_RDWR | O_NONBLOCK);
if (fd < 0) {
- ksft_test_result_fail("Failed to open /proc/sys/vm/nr_hugepages: %s\n",
- strerror(errno));
- return -1;
+ ksft_print_msg("Failed to open /proc/sys/vm/nr_hugepages: %s\n",
+ strerror(errno));
+ ret = -1;
+ goto out;
}
if (read(fd, initial_nr_hugepages, sizeof(initial_nr_hugepages)) <= 0) {
- ksft_test_result_fail("Failed to read from /proc/sys/vm/nr_hugepages: %s\n",
- strerror(errno));
+ ksft_print_msg("Failed to read from /proc/sys/vm/nr_hugepages: %s\n",
+ strerror(errno));
goto close_fd;
}
/* Start with the initial condition of 0 huge pages*/
if (write(fd, "0", sizeof(char)) != sizeof(char)) {
- ksft_test_result_fail("Failed to write 0 to /proc/sys/vm/nr_hugepages: %s\n",
- strerror(errno));
+ ksft_print_msg("Failed to write 0 to /proc/sys/vm/nr_hugepages: %s\n",
+ strerror(errno));
goto close_fd;
}
@@ -118,16 +119,16 @@ int check_compaction(unsigned long mem_free, unsigned int hugepage_size)
/* Request a large number of huge pages. The Kernel will allocate
as much as it can */
if (write(fd, "100000", (6*sizeof(char))) != (6*sizeof(char))) {
- ksft_test_result_fail("Failed to write 100000 to /proc/sys/vm/nr_hugepages: %s\n",
- strerror(errno));
+ ksft_print_msg("Failed to write 100000 to /proc/sys/vm/nr_hugepages: %s\n",
+ strerror(errno));
goto close_fd;
}
lseek(fd, 0, SEEK_SET);
if (read(fd, nr_hugepages, sizeof(nr_hugepages)) <= 0) {
- ksft_test_result_fail("Failed to re-read from /proc/sys/vm/nr_hugepages: %s\n",
- strerror(errno));
+ ksft_print_msg("Failed to re-read from /proc/sys/vm/nr_hugepages: %s\n",
+ strerror(errno));
goto close_fd;
}
@@ -139,24 +140,26 @@ int check_compaction(unsigned long mem_free, unsigned int hugepage_size)
if (write(fd, initial_nr_hugepages, strlen(initial_nr_hugepages))
!= strlen(initial_nr_hugepages)) {
- ksft_test_result_fail("Failed to write value to /proc/sys/vm/nr_hugepages: %s\n",
- strerror(errno));
+ ksft_print_msg("Failed to write value to /proc/sys/vm/nr_hugepages: %s\n",
+ strerror(errno));
goto close_fd;
}
+ ksft_print_msg("Number of huge pages allocated = %d\n",
+ atoi(nr_hugepages));
+
if (compaction_index > 3) {
ksft_print_msg("ERROR: Less that 1/%d of memory is available\n"
"as huge pages\n", compaction_index);
- ksft_test_result_fail("No of huge pages allocated = %d\n", (atoi(nr_hugepages)));
goto close_fd;
}
- ksft_test_result_pass("Memory compaction succeeded. No of huge pages allocated = %d\n",
- (atoi(nr_hugepages)));
ret = 0;
close_fd:
close(fd);
+ out:
+ ksft_test_result(ret == 0, "check_compaction\n");
return ret;
}
Every test result report in the compaction test prints a distinct log messae, and some of the reports print a name that varies at runtime. This causes problems for automation since a lot of automation software uses the printed string as the name of the test, if the name varies from run to run and from pass to fail then the automation software can't identify that a test changed result or that the same tests are being run. Refactor the logging to use a consistent name when printing the result of the test, printing the existing messages as diagnostic information instead so they are still available for people trying to interpret the results. Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> --- tools/testing/selftests/mm/compaction_test.c | 35 +++++++++++++++------------- 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)