Message ID | 20240325134114.257544-2-david@redhat.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | mm/secretmem: one fix and one refactoring | expand |
On Mon, 25 Mar 2024 14:41:12 +0100 David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> wrote: > folio_is_secretmem() states that secretmem folios cannot be LRU folios: > so we may only exit early if we find an LRU folio. Yet, we exit early if > we find a folio that is not a secretmem folio. > > ... > > Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Thanks, I split up this series. Because this patch goes mm-hotfixes-unstable -> mm-hotfixes-stable -> mainline whereas the other two go mm-unstable -> mm-stable -> mainline at a later time.
On 25.03.24 19:30, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Mon, 25 Mar 2024 14:41:12 +0100 David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> wrote: > >> folio_is_secretmem() states that secretmem folios cannot be LRU folios: >> so we may only exit early if we find an LRU folio. Yet, we exit early if >> we find a folio that is not a secretmem folio. >> >> ... >> >> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> > > Thanks, I split up this series. Because this patch goes > mm-hotfixes-unstable -> mm-hotfixes-stable -> mainline whereas the > other two go mm-unstable -> mm-stable -> mainline at a later time. Makes sense. I'll resend a v2 later, because there are some major changes (the fix was wrong/incomplete, we have to remove the LRU test completely).
diff --git a/include/linux/secretmem.h b/include/linux/secretmem.h index 35f3a4a8ceb1..6996f1f53f14 100644 --- a/include/linux/secretmem.h +++ b/include/linux/secretmem.h @@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ static inline bool folio_is_secretmem(struct folio *folio) * We know that secretmem pages are not compound and LRU so we can * save a couple of cycles here. */ - if (folio_test_large(folio) || !folio_test_lru(folio)) + if (folio_test_large(folio) || folio_test_lru(folio)) return false; mapping = (struct address_space *)