diff mbox series

[net-next,v22,08/14] mm: page_frag: use __alloc_pages() to replace alloc_pages_node()

Message ID 20241018105351.1960345-9-linyunsheng@huawei.com (mailing list archive)
State New
Headers show
Series [net-next,v22,01/14] mm: page_frag: add a test module for page_frag | expand

Commit Message

Yunsheng Lin Oct. 18, 2024, 10:53 a.m. UTC 
It seems there is about 24Bytes binary size increase for
__page_frag_cache_refill() after refactoring in arm64 system
with 64K PAGE_SIZE. By doing the gdb disassembling, It seems
we can have more than 100Bytes decrease for the binary size
by using __alloc_pages() to replace alloc_pages_node(), as
there seems to be some unnecessary checking for nid being
NUMA_NO_NODE, especially when page_frag is part of the mm
system.

CC: Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Alexander Duyck <alexanderduyck@fb.com>
---
 mm/page_frag_cache.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/mm/page_frag_cache.c b/mm/page_frag_cache.c
index a852523bc8ca..f55d34cf7d43 100644
--- a/mm/page_frag_cache.c
+++ b/mm/page_frag_cache.c
@@ -56,11 +56,11 @@  static struct page *__page_frag_cache_refill(struct page_frag_cache *nc,
 #if (PAGE_SIZE < PAGE_FRAG_CACHE_MAX_SIZE)
 	gfp_mask = (gfp_mask & ~__GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM) |  __GFP_COMP |
 		   __GFP_NOWARN | __GFP_NORETRY | __GFP_NOMEMALLOC;
-	page = alloc_pages_node(NUMA_NO_NODE, gfp_mask,
-				PAGE_FRAG_CACHE_MAX_ORDER);
+	page = __alloc_pages(gfp_mask, PAGE_FRAG_CACHE_MAX_ORDER,
+			     numa_mem_id(), NULL);
 #endif
 	if (unlikely(!page)) {
-		page = alloc_pages_node(NUMA_NO_NODE, gfp, 0);
+		page = __alloc_pages(gfp, 0, numa_mem_id(), NULL);
 		order = 0;
 	}