diff mbox series

[RFC] mm/mglru: keep the root_memcg reclaim behavior the same as memcg reclaim

Message ID 20241212095646.16164-1-hailong.liu@oppo.com (mailing list archive)
State New
Headers show
Series [RFC] mm/mglru: keep the root_memcg reclaim behavior the same as memcg reclaim | expand

Commit Message

hailong Dec. 12, 2024, 9:56 a.m. UTC
From: Hailong Liu <hailong.liu@oppo.com>

commit a579086c99ed ("mm: multi-gen LRU: remove eviction fairness safeguard") said
Note that memcg LRU only applies to global reclaim. For memcg reclaim,
the eviction will continue, even if it is overshooting. This becomes
unconditional due to code simplification.

Howeven, if we reclaim a root memcg by sysfs (memory.reclaim), the behavior acts
as a kswapd or direct reclaim.

Fix this by remove the condition of mem_cgroup_is_root in
root_reclaim().
Signed-off-by: Hailong Liu <hailong.liu@oppo.com>
---
 mm/vmscan.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--
Actually we switch to mglru on kernel-6.1 and see different behavior on
root_mem_cgroup reclaim. so is there any background fot this?

Brs,
Hailong.

Comments

T.J. Mercier Dec. 12, 2024, 6:22 p.m. UTC | #1
On Thu, Dec 12, 2024 at 1:57 AM hailong <hailong.liu@oppo.com> wrote:
>
> From: Hailong Liu <hailong.liu@oppo.com>
>
> commit a579086c99ed ("mm: multi-gen LRU: remove eviction fairness safeguard") said
> Note that memcg LRU only applies to global reclaim. For memcg reclaim,
> the eviction will continue, even if it is overshooting. This becomes
> unconditional due to code simplification.
>
> Howeven, if we reclaim a root memcg by sysfs (memory.reclaim), the behavior acts
> as a kswapd or direct reclaim.

Hi Hailong,

Why do you think this is a problem?

> Fix this by remove the condition of mem_cgroup_is_root in
> root_reclaim().
> Signed-off-by: Hailong Liu <hailong.liu@oppo.com>
> ---
>  mm/vmscan.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> index 76378bc257e3..1f74f3ba0999 100644
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -216,7 +216,7 @@ static bool cgroup_reclaim(struct scan_control *sc)
>   */
>  static bool root_reclaim(struct scan_control *sc)
>  {
> -       return !sc->target_mem_cgroup || mem_cgroup_is_root(sc->target_mem_cgroup);
> +       return !sc->target_mem_cgroup;
>  }
>
>  /**
> --
> Actually we switch to mglru on kernel-6.1 and see different behavior on
> root_mem_cgroup reclaim. so is there any background fot this?

Reclaim behavior differs with MGLRU.
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20221201223923.873696-1-yuzhao@google.com/

On even more recent kernels, regular LRU reclaim has also changed.
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240514202641.2821494-1-hannes@cmpxchg.org/

> Brs,
> Hailong.
>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index 76378bc257e3..1f74f3ba0999 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -216,7 +216,7 @@  static bool cgroup_reclaim(struct scan_control *sc)
  */
 static bool root_reclaim(struct scan_control *sc)
 {
-	return !sc->target_mem_cgroup || mem_cgroup_is_root(sc->target_mem_cgroup);
+	return !sc->target_mem_cgroup;
 }

 /**