[v13,06/14] x86/mm: use broadcast TLB flushing for page reclaim TLB flushing

Commit Message

Rik van Riel Feb. 23, 2025, 7:48 p.m. UTC

In the page reclaim code, we only track the CPU(s) where the TLB needs
to be flushed, rather than all the individual mappings that may be getting
invalidated.

Use broadcast TLB flushing when that is available.

This is a temporary hack to ensure that the PCID context for
tasks in the next patch gets properly flushed from the page
reclaim code, because the IPI based flushing in arch_tlbbatch_flush
only flushes the currently loaded TLB context on each CPU.

Patch 10 replaces this with the actual mechanism used to do
broadcast TLB flushing from the page reclaim code.

Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <[e-mail]>
Tested-by: Manali Shukla <[e-mail]>
Tested-by: Brendan Jackman <[e-mail]>
Tested-by: Michael Kelley <[e-mail]>
---
 arch/x86/mm/tlb.c | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Patch

diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c b/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
index 2d7ed0fda61f..16839651f67f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
@@ -1326,7 +1326,9 @@  void arch_tlbbatch_flush(struct arch_tlbflush_unmap_batch *batch)
 	 * a local TLB flush is needed. Optimize this use-case by calling
 	 * flush_tlb_func_local() directly in this case.
 	 */
-	if (cpumask_any_but(&batch->cpumask, cpu) < nr_cpu_ids) {
+	if (cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_INVLPGB)) {
+		invlpgb_flush_all_nonglobals();
+	} else if (cpumask_any_but(&batch->cpumask, cpu) < nr_cpu_ids) {
 		flush_tlb_multi(&batch->cpumask, info);
 	} else if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, &batch->cpumask)) {
 		lockdep_assert_irqs_enabled();